• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Naruto: Attack Potency Revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
2,159
831
The AP of the verse on here is really inaccurate, despite there being statements in the anime/manga/novels, outside of the anime by the writers, ect. and just general scaling blatantly saying they're at least planet level people here still deny that for no real reason. The Momoshiki novel feat ignoring is just blatantly denying feats because people don't like the sound of saying anyone from Naruto is planet level ._.
 
Can some admin close this thread? For the obvious reasons. No scans, complaning about the ratings and the comments are even worst
 
CaptainSparkz said:
because they don't believe in statements from guides and from the writers, they have Haku, who should have 7-C AP with FTL speeds at 8-B with Supersonic speeds
You right lol that doesn't make no sense
 
Dunno about closing it outright, but this isn't a CRT so I'll move the thread.
 
Naruto supporters spent weeks calcing and creating the powerscaling for the next big revisions after the forum move. Then a guy comes here, talks about banned topics (Momoshiki and Kaguya dimensions) that were rejected years ago, and complain about the ratings, why can't you close it?
 
Didn't see the Momo part when I skimmed this. That does go against the rules so you're right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top