- 21,487
- 30,819
Respond to what? Are you gonna say the differences don't matter? Or that the differences ain't true?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So.. you are apposed to the entire novel being cannon?Respond to what? Are you gonna say the differences don't matter? Or that the differences ain't true?
We should also declare the anime non-canon if this is enough for the novel to not work.
Literally every canon for Boruto contradicts these events, It's not wise at all to cross the canons like this
The anime/manga split was accepted, but did nor wants to go through the effort of actually making separate profiles.We should also declare the anime non-canon if this is enough for the novel to not work.
How about you wait for a response to find out? I was not at home and so I needed to get back to form a response.Respond to what? Are you gonna say the differences don't matter? Or that the differences ain't true?
They always ignore the main premises of the threadHow about you wait for a response to find out? I was not at home and so I needed to get back to form a response.
Anyways, out of the 8 differences you mentioned, in 3 of them, the novel doesn't contradict the manga, the anime does. And this has been the case always. The anime has made a few changes when compared to the manga too, but we do use it as supporting material don't we? For example the Light fang calculation uses the anime version because it doesn't contradict the manga but adds to it. The Novel would be used in the same way. That is the entire point of this thread. Nobody is saying that Boruto's vanishing rasengan should be made wind release because of the novels.
The premise of the thread is that the Novel should be allowed to be used as supporting material whenever it doesn't directly contradict the manga. In cases of contradictions, the primary source material will take precedence.
"The manga agrees but the anime is different ".
Literally every canon for Boruto contradicts these events, It's not wise at all to cross the canons like this
I'm making a thread soon to use the manga Versus Momoshiki arc over the anime soon due to the massive differences, I just need more time because it effects other keys as well.We should also declare the anime non-canon if this is enough for the novel to not work.
Literally every canon for Boruto contradicts these events, It's not wise at all to cross the canons like this
The main premise is "accept the novelization for the manga and anime"."The manga agrees but the anime is different ".
How you gonna discredit a novel that follows the manga because it didn't follow the anime?
Like it follows the primary canon but somehow it is a contradiction coz the secondary canon didn't follow both?
As supporting material, meaning that if a feat/statement exists within the novel that is backed up by either the anime or manga or both than it is applicable for use, you can't just manipulate the OP into giving a reason to disagree when there is none to begin with.The main premise is "accept the novelization for the manga and anime".
Get your head out of your asses and read the OP. 3 of yall already said the same stuff to me. Damn
I don't understand why they are having a hard time understanding that we just want certain parts that is backed by either the anime or manga as support material, not the entire thing as cannon.I think the main aim of this thread should just be to remove the discussion rule that prohibits the use of the novel since no such rule exists for the anime.
Again, the same applies to the anime. The anime has outright left stuff out. But it isn't decanonized as a whole.I disagree, because we have no way of knowing that something was excluded for the purpose of being made non canonical or not.
The precedence for other series is not using retconned material.
We are not arguing about the entire novel being cannon, only parts of it as supporting material I they are backed up by either the anime or manga or both. For example, if Momoshiki blow up a planet in the novels but not in the anime or manga then we won't use that feat, but if there is proof that he did do it in the anime or manga or both then it should be applicable for useI disagree, because we have no way of knowing that something was excluded for the purpose of being made non canonical or not.
The precedence for other series is not using retconned material.
I disagree, we don’t know this.We are not arguing about the entire novel being cannon, only parts of it as supporting material I they are backed up by either the anime or manga or both. For example, if Momoshiki blow up a planet in the novels but not in the anime or manga then we won't use that feat, but if there is proof that he did do it in the anime or manga or both then it should be applicable for use
Because it's in the OPI disagree, we don’t know this.
You said it should be, but left out the reasoning as to why
The main premise is "accept the novelization for the manga and anime".
Get your head out of your asses and read the OP. 3 of yall already said the same stuff to me. Damn
Uh, the lightning blade thing isn't inconsistent. Sasuke has been coating his sword in Chidori since the start of Part 2.
Literally every canon for Boruto contradicts these events, It's not wise at all to cross the canons like this
In the movie sasuke wasn't with a sword in kaguya dimension. He straight up made a sword with lightning. Like when he fought madara after getting six pathUh, the lightning blade thing isn't inconsistent. Sasuke has been coating his sword in Chidori since the start of Part 2.
Because that doesn't work. You can't use a retconned event's events as support for main canon when it's literally 2 different plot lines. You'd end up cherrypicking what works and what doesn't.I don't understand why they are having a hard time understanding that we just want certain parts that is backed by either the anime or manga as support material, not the entire thing as cannon.
The OP makes a case for why the differences between the movie and the anime shouldn't decanonize the entire movie and it's novel.do we even accept the movie as canon? I don't think we do, so why would we use the novelization that's meant to be for a movie that we dont even accept as canon, for our profiles?
if you wanted to get the novelization canon you'd have to get the movie canon... which isn't happening for obvious reasons.
No. The Movie and the Novel are both tertiary. They only come into play when we get confusing statements in the animanga. The reason we need this is because novels are way more descriptive and to the point when compared to the anime or the manga. But since we never got a novelization of the manga, the movie novel can be used to clear up some confusion.So is the OP saying that the movie should be held on the same level as the anime when it comes to adapting manga content (secondary)?
Dragonball treats it's media way different than how Naruto treats it on this site.anyone know how dragonball treats BoG and RoF movies in regards to the anime or manga?
Pretty sure neither of those movies are canon anymore, being replaced by the anime and the manga versions.anyone know how dragonball treats BoG and RoF movies in regards to the anime or manga?
Ok. Your (or the OP's) reasoning is for clarification. What in the movies or novels make clear that the manga makes rather unclear? If you can lay them out then that could potentially make for a better argument.No. The Movie and the Novel are both tertiary. They only come into play when we get confusing statements in the animanga. The reason we need this is because novels are way more descriptive and to the point when compared to the anime or the manga. But since we never got a novelization of the manga, the novel can be used to clear up some confusion.
Alright. For example in the anime Momoshiki says that he created his nursery that Naruto was taken to. Nursery is a vague term. But the novel makes it clear that Momoshiki created the parallel dimension.Ok. Your (or the OP's) reasoning is for clarification. What in the movies or novels make clear that the manga makes rather unclear? If you can lay them out then that could potentially make for a better argument.
Because right now you (or the OP) are saying that there's stuff that the manga made confusing or unclear, without actually listing out what's unclear. To me it looks like you (or the OP) are making problems (not literally) where there isn't any, because you haven't actually given any examples towards your case.
Like for example if Boruto in the manga randomly used fire style and Boruto was like "Sasuke I finally perfected it", obviously that's confusing because we saw Sasuke teach Boruto but we never saw him teach him fire style, but if in the novelization or in the movie, we see Sasuke mention that he'd teach Boruto fire style, then that could potentially push towards the argument being made.
Example's kinda weird but I hope I made sense.
Non-canonanyone know how dragonball treats BoG and RoF movies in regards to the anime or manga?
Don't worry we are not looking to accept feats from the novel as cannon only thing that help add more information to the cannon material.Because that doesn't work. You can't use a retconned event's events as support for main canon when it's literally 2 different plot lines. You'd end up cherrypicking what works and what doesn't.
Either the whole thing's canon or none of it is. You can't pick and choose "certain parts that work"
I agree with thisI disagree, because we have no way of knowing that something was excluded for the purpose of being made non canonical or not.
The precedence for other series is not using retconned material.
So I guess we can put you in agree then. And yeah, nothing will really change tiers especially now that chakra isn't UES.i dont really have an issue as long as its used as supportive meaning anything in the manga or anime should take precedence. we already do this with other series that have multiple versions of the same event that are also somehow canon.
though i want to note something as someone who has read the novelization multiple times with better translations than what is used often off site , dont expect anything that will radically change the characters tiers (as im assuming this is likely the intent from some)
Which sucks, that they got removed from UESSo I guess we can put you in agree then. And yeah, nothing will really change tiers especially now that chakra isn't UES.