- 574
- 274
- Thread starter
- #161
K, I'll be careful next timeGenerally avoid bumping threads until 24 hours had passed since last post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
K, I'll be careful next timeGenerally avoid bumping threads until 24 hours had passed since last post.
I think you meant X6Bump X5
Me badI think you meant X6
Nuh uh, it’s X7Bump X6
Guess I am living 1 day behindNuh uh, it’s X7
There are only few Naruto supporter mods left who want anything to do with this verse (can't say I blame them). Unless it's a huge upgrade thread, I don't see CRTs like this getting much traction.It was forgotten like other Naruto CRTs.
Any chance you can contact more thread mods?Bump X10
Dont know any and someone already posted this thread to the mods threadAny chance you can contact more thread mods?
need one more vote for either side. If a mod agrees then this thread gets accepted, but if they disagree then the thread gets closedNow, how is the result determined when 2 mods say they agree and 2 mods say they disagree? If Mod 5, who will express his opinion, says he agrees, will the recommendations in the CRT be implemented? On the contrary, will it be closed even if he says he disagrees?
Btw, do you mind drafting a discussion rule? Or is it not required the same way we don't have a discussion rule for the anime being secondary canon?I'm kind of inclined to agree with Shadow here.
The movie was adapted from a script written by Kishi and the novel was written by Kodachi, who wrote the first half of the Boruto manga. The point is, these two products had heavy involvement from the main writers of the series, and are recognized as part of the official timeline by the parent company.
That being said, assuming this goes through, the manga will still take precedence as the primary canon source. So the novel would only be useful as a tertiary source that's really only good for clarification or giving additional information/context not present in the other adaptations, provided they cause no contradictions ofc. Essentially the exact role the anime currently serves, but obviously a bit diminished because the novel doesn't have the plethora of "this is canon to the manga continuity" statements that the anime has. But I disgress.
I think a note explaining the situation on the Verse Page will suffice and be more appropriate imo.Btw, do you mind drafting a discussion rule? Or is it not required the same way we don't have a discussion rule for the anime being secondary canon?
"The manga is treated as the primary source material while the anime and novels are considered secondary and tertiary source materials respectively. The tertiary canon status of the Boruto movie novelization was agreed upon in this thread." Sumn like this? Or do you think I should add something like "Information from the tertiary canon can only be used if the specific information doesn't contradict the primary and the secondary canon"I think a note explaining the situation on the Verse Page will suffice and be more appropriate imo.
Yeah. That would be great.the verse page I have in the works has a section outlining canon content with notes that explain the part they play in the canon.
I can add it to that if anything that way you don't make a new section just for it to get replaced soon after
Yeah something like this would do the trick."The manga is treated as the primary source material while the anime and novels are considered secondary and tertiary source materials respectively. The tertiary canon status of the novels was agreed upon in this thread." Sumn like this? Or do you think I should add something like "Information from the tertiary canon can only be used if the specific information doesn't contradict the primary and the secondary canon"
Great idea, Bubba. Thanks.the verse page I have in the works has a section outlining canon content with notes that explain the part they play in the canon.
I can add it to that if anything that way you don't make a new section just for it to get replaced soon after
The discussion rule needs to be removed first.Then this thread can be closed now
how me do that?The discussion rule needs to be removed first.
how me do that?
Slayer do you mind helping Alt here.Bubba.
I think that's a job for an Admin or content mod. That page is locked.Slayer do you mind helping Alt here.
should i go to the all purpose thread and ask them to remove it?I think that's a job for an Admin or content mod. That page is locked.