• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Nanatsu no Taizai: Upgrade FTL+

How sure are we that the "speed of light attack" statement here is literal and not a hyperbolic / figurative statement?
I mean the main issue to me is that text being used for SOL basis is removed from the volume version. It was solely editor text. Which we don't count afaik.
 
I mean the main issue to me is that text being used for SOL basis is removed from the volume version. It was solely editor text. Which we don't count afaik.
The Q&As are also removed from the volume version, even though Nakaba himself answers them.

I remember Makai saying that Nakaba is involved in the editor's notes; I'll see if I can find the scans
 
The Q&As are also removed from the volume version, even though Nakaba himself answers them.
I mean, that's difficult to use then in my view. If the only source exists in a magazine and is not included in the finalized product in any capacity, I'm not sure if its useable.
 
I’m confused, just because it’s edited out of the volume(probably to make the page less of a cluster) why shouldn’t an author answering a Q&A difficult to use?
 
I mean, that's difficult to use then in my view. If the only source exists in a magazine and is not included in the finalized product in any capacity, I'm not sure if its useable.
This doesn't really make sense, given that it's in the official fanbooks, as well as being the author's own word issued by official means (manga). They probably removed it from the volumes so as not to pollute the visuals.

Apparently, in the top right-hand corner, it says that the Q&A was created by Nakaba.
 
I mean, that's difficult to use then in my view. If the only source exists in a magazine and is not included in the finalized product in any capacity, I'm not sure if its useable.
It is, side texts are always edited out, tho q&a corner is considered canon
 
Back
Top