- 1,617
- 1,597
That's fine.@Earthyboy I don't actually know.
I'm currently not in the best state of mind right now, so maybe I'm speaking nonsense, might be best for you to ask a staff member.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's fine.@Earthyboy I don't actually know.
I'm currently not in the best state of mind right now, so maybe I'm speaking nonsense, might be best for you to ask a staff member.
Ok, make sure to take care of yourself@Earthyboy I don't actually know.
I'm currently not in the best state of mind right now, so maybe I'm speaking nonsense, might be best for you to ask a staff member.
Go and change the site's standards then.Inaccurate pixel scaling? Do you kid yourself? Literally using any other object to pixel scale the tower gives us a completely different result than using the tower's official height. Wouldn't that be an obvious hint that the tower's official height is bullshit and doesn't make sense mathematically? People have used several methods to calculate the height of the tower, its platforms width, etc. And not a single iteration of the methods are consistent with yours's.
If the rule is that officials are always taken over accurate pixel scaling, even despite the fact that there are several contradictions to the "official measurements" then there's something wrong with the site's standards that needs changing.
Well shit.I tried to use visuals to go against the "official size" of areas in Bleach and was overruled.
I would assume it applies to width too. If she only became taller but not wider, she would appear extremely thin from a far distance.I think we'd need another translation in that case, if that becomes a problem as well. Another translation had it be 1000X her own size.
Though 1000X bigger does make me think of taller, not volume wise. But I guess it isn't impossible?
It was mainly conflicting ocean depth, but because their 50km away from japan (maybe even farther given that it's stated to be outside the Japanese airspace), Therefir's use of 3.7km should be correctI’m confused at this thread. What seems to be conflicting the original calc?
Okay, so would it have to get recalced? Or have we agreed on a distance + depthIt was mainly conflicting ocean depth, but because their 50km away from japan (maybe even farther given that it's stated to be outside the Japanese airspace), Therefir's use of 3.7km should be correct
He was pinned to the ocean floor last chapter.Here's a potential problem; was Shigaraki already at the ocean floor while the laser being was pressed against him to hold him in place?
He seems to be, given that he instantly made a hole beneath him when the laser stopped.
That presents an issue with our scaling of Star and Stripe's avatar being 2.2 KM tall or with the ocean depth being 3.7 km deep; because the united laser beam she's holding her hands is plainly not more than 3.7 km in comparison to the avatar yet it can reach the ocean floor and also stick out above the ocean's surface.He was pinned to the ocean floor last chapter.
An ellipsoid was also used for the volume, despite the explosion itself (which created the crater) seeming more spherical in shape (don't know if thats an issue or not just thought I'd point it out). Also it smooths itself at the bottom, which would suggest it to be more cylindricalThat presents an issue with our scaling of Star and Stripe's avatar being 2.2 KM tall or with the ocean depth being 3.7 km deep; because the united laser beam she's holding her hands is plainly not more than 3.7 km in comparison to the avatar yet it can reach the ocean floor and also stick out above the ocean's surface.
Instead of assuming an ocean depth, I think we should be scaling the length of laser that enter the ocean and reaches the ocean floor.
should someone redo it with 2.2km as the scale instead of 3.7?That presents an issue with our scaling of Star and Stripe's avatar being 2.2 KM tall or with the ocean depth being 3.7 km deep; because the united laser beam she's holding her hands is plainly not more than 3.7 km in comparison to the avatar yet it can reach the ocean floor and also stick out above the ocean's surface.
Instead of assuming an ocean depth, I think we should be scaling the length of laser that enter the ocean and reaches the ocean floor.
I think this shouldn’t really be up for debate. It’s stated that the depth is literally always going to be above 3000m to see a ocean floor. So that can’t really be changed tbhif they were than we'd have to assume 3.7km as the depth , as by that point they are very far into the pacific which means that it's likely, unless we want to take it to outlier territory with 6km depths
The problem is that the laser is too inconsistent, in the last chapter, page 3, we can see that the laser can reach as high as the clouds, even when it is restraining Shigaraki in the depths of the ocean.Instead of assuming an ocean depth, I think we should be scaling the length of laser that enter the ocean and reaches the ocean floor.
PainWhat did I miss?
That could be an inconsistency with the clouds, rather than an inconsistency with the laser.The problem is that the laser is too inconsistent, in the last chapter, page 3, we can see that the laser can reach as high as the clouds, even when it is restraining Shigaraki in the depths of the ocean.
Sorry for not helping until now, I haven't had internet until a few hours ago.
Apparently there is something wrong with the calc and if it is, it's not High 7-A and 6-C anymore, which makes the heroes rising feat again an outlier.
My only questions for it were why 1/12 was used for KE, and why an ellipsoid was used for the volume (the smoothed edge at the bottom of the crater seems more in line with a cylinder)The problem is that the laser is too inconsistent, in the last chapter, page 3, we can see that the laser can reach as high as the clouds, even when it is restraining Shigaraki in the depths of the ocean.
Sorry for not helping until now, I haven't had internet until a few hours ago.
1/12 is used when the mass is dispersed from a center point, which is what happened in this feat.My only questions for it were why 1/12 was used for KE, and why an ellipsoid was used for the volume (the smoothed edge at the bottom of the crater seems more cylindrical)
ah ok1/12 is used when the mass is dispersed from a center point, which is what happened in this feat.
how would it being a cylinder effect the feat?1/12 is used when the mass is dispersed from a center point, which is what happened in this feat.
The crater seems spherical enough for an ellipsoid to be used.
Even if we measured the laser, it would still be difficult if not impossible to use it to find the depth of the ocean in that area.That could be an inconsistency with the clouds, rather than an inconsistency with the laser.
And actually it doesn't seem that bad to me. The entire unified laser starts off well above the clouds in the previous chapter, then in the latest chapter the entire length of laser is just below the cloudline because Star and Stripe stabbed downward with it.
So shouldn’t we jus scale the laser based off what we saw it last as?The problem is that the laser is too inconsistent, in the last chapter, page 3, we can see that the laser can reach as high as the clouds, even when it is restraining Shigaraki in the depths of the ocean.
Sorry for not helping until now, I haven't had internet until a few hours ago.
Even if we measured the laser, it would still be difficult if not impossible to use it to find the depth of the ocean in that area.
Is there any scientific backing behind that? I've searched all over and I've seen nothing suggesting that's actually a scientific fact when concerning kinetic energy. I've even checked wikipeida.1/12 is used when the mass is dispersed from a center point, which is what happened in this feat.
agreed, searching for it I've found nothingIs there any scientific backing behind that? I've searched all over and I've seen nothing suggesting that's actually a scientific fact when concerning kinetic energy. I've even checked wikipeida.
It's in our pages.Is there any scientific backing behind that? I've searched all over and I've seen nothing suggesting that's actually a scientific fact when concerning kinetic energy. I've even checked wikipeida.
30+ Megatons, not bad. That would work fine actually, for the future upgrades I have planned at least...
personally I would have done 2.2km, as from reading earlier in the thread it seemed to be the agreed height of the laser, though it most likely still would have been at most High 7-A, or you could publish all three on the same calc and give them as high mid and low ends
Yeah, please do that.personally I would have done 2.2km, as from reading earlier in the thread it seemed to be the agreed height of the laser, though it most likely still would have been at most High 7-A, or you could publish all three on the same calc and give them as high mid and low ends
I'll just give the measurements myself, and you can choose to publish it or not @TherefirYeah, please do that.
2.2 km is not the height of the laser.personally I would have done 2.2km, as from reading earlier in the thread it seemed to be the agreed height of the laser, though it most likely still would have been at most High 7-A, or you could publish all three on the same calc and give them as high mid and low ends
ah ok, nevermind then, may I ask what it is? (I already have the calculators and stuff up), and would high end, mid end, and low end still apply for 3.7km 1km and whatever the lasers height is?2.2 km is not the height of the laser.
I'll post my calc soon.