- 11,807
- 7,371
- Thread starter
- #81
Alternative solution: delete superman profiles which are similar to each other.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Alternative solution: delete superman profiles which are similar to each other.
MvC isn't covered by point 3, because it is in point 2, an alternate timeline with little relevance Alternative Canon/Non-Canonical profiles for Marvel and DC Comics can only be created if the version in question proves relevant/notable enough, through popularity and/or number of issues present."3) Should said alternative versions originate within the main continuity, they would also be considered primary canon, and allowed, if notable enough.
Ex: Thought Robot/Cosmic Armor Superman, the DC One Million characters, and the Earth-3 Crime Syndicate of America all originate within mainstream comics, and feature interactions with the primary DC Characters. Similarly, the Marvel Ultimate Universe was a prominent comicbook line for a considerable time, and the two continuities have recently merged into one, so profiles from said verse are also allowed, as long as proper feats and scaling can be found for the statistics."
Since MvC is its own numbered continuity, ergo a canonical part of the marvel universe, it falls under this case.
But we already knew that this is an unofficial crossover, i.e. one not happening to the main canon characters. Have we not mentioned this?Remove all mentions of MvC Marvel characters as examples within the Crossover section, I think you can see the page yourself and note how many times they (now wrongly) mention that MvC Marvel profiles aren't allowed on the presumption they're the same characters as their 616 counterparts
When did Morlun "kill" this version of Spider-Man btw?
Well, we only see this as a generic fighting game universe, with no other information about it, so drawing the conclusion that it is automatically identical to MvC seems unreliable.Here, it comes from the Spiderverse arc and I think it's the first instance where we see the MvC universe being one of the many in the multiverse. (I may also have this issue, I should check)
We don't really see this Spider-Man die, but Morlun and his family were ravaging the multiverse to kill the Spider-Men and eat they life essence, they did it to hundreds of them while visiting as many universes, and it would be weird for Morlun to just knock him out and then leave. (I know you are knowledgeable on Marvel, but I don't know if you have read or know this arc).
Yes, you are correct. It is just hard to draw the line sometimes. The rule is mostly there so we do not get 10 duplicate profile pages for every single Naruto character based on fighting games, for example, but it has failed to prevent a massive amount of Godzilla versions, for example (although I think that some of the least relevant ones were removed recently at least).Last thing to clarify, as we were debating it, am I wrong or alternate versions of characters aren't allowed when they are too similar to the main one? Because I thought the main point was for a character to be different in story, powers, personality and such and not just being canon to something.
Tbf Capcom had it hard working with Marvel, cuz of the rights on their characters, which is more evident with infinite where x-men and FF characters were excluded for that reason, so thats more on legal stuff with characters then a reason for arguing canonicityWithout account the fact that some would just tend to disappear
I had my Superman 64 profile deleted because it wasn't distinctive enough. So, ha.Pretty sure Superman has like 20 profiles that are similar to each other in story and powers, still is allowed, same for other super heroes from DC and Marvel
I understand that we avoid profiles that are too similar to others, but MVC characters have an actual story completely different from their main versions, with some having different powers even (Wolverine can project energy for example), and going by, again, Superman profiles for example, having a different story and a few different powers is apparently enough
No problem.Please give this at least a few days before closing it if you intend to, I don't think Zark will be able to reply for a while.
It's fine, I have developed pneumonia due to COVID, so not at the best of health here lolI'm not sure if I should share, it's her privacy after all- in fact I kind of am not sure if I should have said that at all.
Already stated, MvC isn't non-canon. Irrelevant point.Certain anime & manga franchises also run into similar problems. For instance, Dragon Ball possesses numerous alternative continuity games, and non-canon movies. Other large scale franchises often run into similar problems, containing numerous non-canonical spin-offs and alternate continuities.
Says nothing about DISTINCTIVENESS, only seems to refer to notabilityHowever, problem can arise from this: If one were to allow all alternate and/or non-canon versions of said characters, we would eventually be crowded with dozens of alternate profiles for the same characters, as well as composite profiles that cross-scale across multiple continuities and inflate the number of pages even more.
This is in-reference to Elseworld stories, which aren't notable enough5) Certain franchises also contain a variety of spin-offs and alternate continuities, yet justify their existence due to in-series Multiverses. In such cases, Rule Number 3 still applies, albeit to a lesser scale. Original characters from said works are all allowed, yet alternate versions of original canon characters should not be abused.
What point is this from?The key issue overall is notability/relevance. If a spin-off version of a character is very popular, prominent, and distinctive from the original, with a sufficient number of feats or descriptions to scale from, it can generally be featured.
Yes, Saman, please compare a video game franchise 5 games in, to these one-panel characters. Excellent strawmen you've brought upBeing canon to something is only part of the reasoning, Ant also said that, we can't make dozens of versions of irrelevant characters just because they are legit, otherwise even these people could have a profile because they exists within the Marvel multiverse.
Saman are they guest characters? Or crossover characters?Or as I said, every guest or crossover character that is recognized in-verse by a relevant franchise can have a page
Again, show the statement that asks for distinctiveness.It's not a new standard, not at all, there have been plenty of cases of characters that got deleted because they were identical to their main version, with the only difference being a slight story alteration, situation or stats alone, even recently.
Irrelevance and Unnotability =/= DistinctivenessAnd the Godzilla profiles were in the same situation, they were even more different from the original than how the MvC versions of Cap America, Wolverine, Morrigan and Mega Man and all the others are. They are archetypes of specific characters translated into a crossover. They would be unnotable and irrelevant in the same way.
Please delete the MCU Captain America RIGHT NOW, if plot doesn't matterPlot alone doesn't mean anything if it doesn't have a particular influence on the character. At the end of the day they are all the same, they have fought some characters they have never met before, but they are still them in terms of personality, powers, abilities and so on.
Then so be it.The creators also says that Spider Man is dead.
Universe designation are an editor affair.I might as well say that the Marvel writers aren't the creators of the series and their statements or actions aren't totally trustworthy, or their involvement is at the very least mostly unknown.
"It's more believable for my headcanon to be true than the 50% owner's canon"The series is co-owned by Capcom and Marvel. A page depicting alternate universe that references the game doesn't automatically makes it canon to the entire series, as it's totally possible for it to be one specific universe and not the universe, which in itself is inconsistent and disconnected between all games but this seems to be ignored in this debate.
It was why they weren't allowed in the first place, mind you, this is something I distinctly remember.But again, Marvel making them a universe in their multiverse is irrelevant, MvC doesn't need Marvel's approval to be recognized and it wasn't the reason said profiles were forbidden in the first place.
1) That was to not crop the entire quote, I wanted to paste it in its entirety.Already stated, MvC isn't non-canon. Irrelevant point.
Says nothing about DISTINCTIVENESS, only seems to refer to notability
This is in-reference to Elseworld stories, which aren't notable enough
What point is this from?
Yes, Saman, please compare a video game franchise 5 games in, to these one-panel characters. Excellent strawmen you've brought up
Saman are they guest characters? Or crossover characters?
Again, show the statement that asks for distinctiveness.
Irrelevance and Unnotability =/= Distinctiveness
Please delete the MCU Captain America RIGHT NOW, if plot doesn't matter
Then so be it.
Universe designation are an editor affair.
"It's more believable for my headcanon to be true than the 50% owner's canon"
It was why they weren't allowed in the first place, mind you, this is something I distinctly remember.
Okay good, we should have no unknowns on that profile when we actually finish MvC as a verse thoughWe were debating about him several months ago in some thread (one about Dark-Khan, I believe), basically it's a matter of finding feats from the MvCI storyline, have them calced and then make a CRT.