• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
this is an absolute and utter stomp. Please read rules and read the tiers before making a match.
 
Which one? There is no explanation needed to say that Muzan stomps, I know some are gonna disagree and say Muzan wins, however, that's wank and Muzan stomps.
 
Absolute and utter stomp for Muzan.Muzan has literally no way of winning this match.Muzan literally blinks and Muzan dies.Muzan solos Muzan's verse
 
No,Like I said stop wanking Muzan.He has literally no feats to contend with Muzan.Muzan butter waves Muzan and Muzan dies like the fodder he is.
 
Silentpixels said:
lets get mods on this one maybe they can help solve this mystery
The mystery of Muzan stomping Muzan?Or the mystery of Muzan getting wrecked by Muzan?
 
muzan is about muzan-A tier while the other muzan is high muzan-A tier. I think the latter muzan wins.
 
The Muzan wank is real. Obviously Muzan blitzes here. Muzan no-diff.
 
Planck69 said:
Of course not. The former is Immuzzurable.
but immuzzurable is muzan/muzan=muzan

yet we have both muzans in this calcuzan which means muzan shouldn't be immuzzurable
 
The calc is flawed. It completely ignored Muztime and assumed that muzan was Muzdrained. He's clearly muzrelevant but immuzzaurable is the lowest it can go.
 
Planck69 said:
The calc is flawed. It completely ignored Muztime and assumed that muzan was Muzdrained. He's clearly muzrelevant but immuzzaurable is the lowest it can go.
anyways didn't muzan destroy the muzanverse?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top