- 1,411
- 988
I am about to murder them as well.
Do it!
They deserve it for spoiling the series to others every chance they get
Mfs ruined the anime for me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am about to murder them as well.
Really? I haven’t read AOT but the fans always praise Eren for being one of the best MC’s of all time.Btw I wanna know since when Eren became the standard for good character development & writing since he ******* sucks.
Give me the address of each of them, and I murder their souls.Really? I haven’t read AOT but the fans always praise Eren for being one of the best MC’s of all time.
Can I join?Give me the address of each of them, and I murder their souls.
This is a bit confusing; there is an endpoint because there is consensus and standards, but when you put it in other instance, there is none while it still use the same setting as the former?Nah this is much much more subjective than vsdebating lol.
In vsdebating you at least have an end goal where one side has to win. In writing comparison there's no end goal. Two sides can have different opinions on what makes for good writing.
And sure...?I personally prefer characters that explore unique themes and have a lot of depth/complexity. Others might prefer characters that go through lots of development. The particular themes being explored by the characters also influence people's opinions. Some people connect with particular themes more than other people and hence find them more impactful. Some can prefer characters with lots of writing while others can prefer characters with less writing but who are well executed. Etc
CrabBro, like, chill a lil'.
Can't comprehend what you are saying here.This is a bit confusing; there is an endpoint because there is consensus and standards, but when you put it in other instance, there is none while it still use the same setting as the former?
I never said it's different. I said that it is much more subjective.And sure...?
I still can't figure how it is different to vs. thread. Some people think this, and others that, and there is voting for which one seems to be most convincing.
That's not objective. That's just collective consensus (even that is debatable). Popularity=/=Better.Moreover, while it is undoubtedly subjective, there exist books that can be considered the best written for each year, just as there is a chosen most beautiful woman each year.
Obviously. However you can't really compare these factors without bias when two works are both "good" in a similar league.However, there are objective factors that contribute to such distinctions, including originality, clarity, grammar and spelling, coherence, conciseness, audience awareness, purposefulness, and the author's voice and style, among others.
That's just a popularity contest. If enough people think Goku is better written then he is. Don't act like a contest of popularity is a contest of better writing.Despite its subjectivity, we can still determine the best option for the specified tier. By establishing a consensus, voting, and defining criteria, we can strive to make it acceptable to some extent, even if not entirely objective.
Neither I, thus I am confused. But whatever.Can't comprehend what you are saying here.
Interesting take, but I will say one thing: this statement is also subjective.I never said it's different. I said that it is much more subjective.
Not my point.That's not objective. That's just collective consensus (even that is debatable). Popularity=/=Better.
Not even my point as well. There is nothing to exist in those contests or arguments without some drops of biasness, even in vs. thread.Obviously. However you can't really compare these factors without bias when two works are both "good" in a similar league.
Not my point.That's just a popularity contest. If enough people think Goku is better written then he is. Don't act like a contest of popularity is a contest of better writing.
It's already defined, and you already proposed one for 2-A tier.Also good luck with "defining criteria" for writing lmao. It takes next level arrogance to think you can quantify the art of writing.
Well yes it's something that relies on common sense to communicate the point.Interesting take, but I will say one thing: this statement is also subjective.
I think you missed the point. Comparisons between "good" works will be so vague and subjective that bias can't be avoided. Because "writing" is much much more vague than "who wins in a fight". But I guess expecting common sense from you is too much to ask.Not even my point as well. There is nothing to exist in those contests or arguments without some drops of biasness, even in vs. thread.
You mean the thread which goes "explain why YOU think these characters are well written and then we will hold a vote"? Genuinely wondering if you just can't read. There's no criteria or ruleset here.It's already defined, and you already proposed one for 2-A tier.
Not my mindset. Saying that discussion in a particular field is useless because of EXTREME subjectivity doesn't equate to saying everything has to be 100% objective.Your mindset of “everything should be objective and everything should be defined without biasness" actually let me ask if you live in reality or fantasy.
I did not miss any point. It's the same concept in every contest, and it is subjective, so? Setup voting guidelines and whatever the majority perceives the best written book will be decided and added.I think you missed the point. Comparisons between "good" works will be so vague and subjective that bias can't be avoided. Because "writing" is much much more vague than "who wins in a fight". But I guess expecting common sense from you is too much to ask.
Not my point.You mean the thread which goes "explain why YOU think these characters are well written and then we will hold a vote"? Genuinely wondering if you just can't read. There's no criteria or ruleset here.
Sorry, but it's my impression on your arguments.Not my mindset. Saying that discussion in a particular field is useless because of EXTREME subjectivity doesn't equate to saying everything has to be 100% objective.
1: Explain why you think the character is well written, then we will vote similar to Versus Threads.There's no criteria or ruleset here.
Clover, can you check who actually started it first? You may see the reason.Dread, could you please not get so hostile? There's no reason to do so
It’s not a warning, it’s just an advice.Clover, can you check who actually started it first? You may see the reason.
Either warn us both or warn the person who can't argue without being passive aggressive in his messages to pick a fight.
Definitely not. You just create more agression by doing this.My bad. I should not be mad at someone who is being hostile against me.
Apologies to everyone.
I did, but stuff like "But I guess expecting reading from you is too much to ask" and "Genuinely wondering if you just can't read" is more outwardly aggressive by comparison. Though I can agree with there being passive aggression on Darksmash's end, to which I'd extend the same advice.
Tbf that also started from me. I was annoyed at that moment, since the argument wasn't going anywhere. Which is why I won't engage any further since I don't see any productive discussion or progress on this topic when arguing with Dread.I did, but stuff like "But I guess expecting reading from you is too much to ask" and "Genuinely wondering if you just can't read" is more outwardly aggressive by comparison. Though I can agree with there being passive aggression on Darksmash's end, to which I'd extend the same advice.
Noted.Definitely not. You just create more agression by doing this.
Contact a staff member or go to the RVR. It’s way better than just act the same as the person who is wrong.