DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,847
- 15,275
KIRBY IS A GREAT CHARACTER
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Basically creates a sort of "consensus" on the best-written characters for each tierHow would voting help?
KH is just not for everyone TBH, as much we all have different tastes, being one of the founders of crossovers on video games combined with giving a interesting serious tone without getting NSFW was quite ahead of its time, although what usually puts off many is the complicated plot, but like mustard, it can enhance the experience to some.you were making great points and then you suggested ******* Kingdom Hearts
ListenKH is just not for everyone TBH, as much we all have different tastes, being one of the founders of crossovers on video games combined with giving a interesting serious tone without getting NSFW was quite ahead of its time, although what usually puts off many is the complicated plot, but like mustard, it can enhance the experience to some.
Why do people need to "admit" to something they don't actually believe?My senses only recoil when a person cannot admit that what they're liking is not actually the best thing ever made
I love how you proved his point.you were making great points and then you suggested ******* Kingdom Hearts
because using the word "daft" is generally considered meanWhy do people need to "admit" to something they don't actually believe?
and I find something hilariously shallow about 99% of the verses present. I also find it shallow to not really consider the depth of your own verses when suggesting them for something like this, purely coz you like 'em. I love, earnestly love, a lot of verses- I could in no way suggest most of them for even coming into the running for "Best written character" because they don't write characters well, what's so hard to understand about that lmaoIdk I find something hilariously shallow about the idea of "you think something's better written than I think it is, so you're ******* daft"
The beauty of writing is finding depth in damn near anything. I could see something as hilariously shallow while you may find a lot of depth to it. It's also very hypocritical of you to take issue with the "I like this and I need everyone to agree with me" mindset only to turn around and go "if you think of this character's writing in a different way than I do you're just wrong"and I find something hilariously shallow about 99% of the verses present. I also find it shallow to not really consider the depth of your own verses when suggesting them for something like this, purely coz you like 'em. I love, earnestly love, a lot of verses- I could in no way suggest most of them for even coming into the running for "Best written character" because they don't write characters well, what's so hard to understand about that lmao
The beauty of writing is finding depth in damn near anything. I could see something as hilariously shallow while you may find a lot of depth to it. It's also very hypocritical of you to take issue with the "I like this and I need everyone to agree with me" mindset only to turn around and go "if you think of this character's writing in a different way than I do you're just wrong"
No, there isn't. What's objective about are the things that happen within a piece of media itself. What you make of it is wholly subjectiveThere is objectivity when it comes to character development and writing
People may think a character is well written sure, but if it actually is or isn't dependsnon multiple factors
You can't just say Goku is well written and has a lot of depth and expect people to take you seriously
It's not hypocritical to believe a character isn't that well written as long you have proper reasons and arguments to back up your claims
No, there isn't. What's objective about are the things that happen within a piece of media itself. What you make of it is wholly subjective
Eh, I never proposed KH as the best writing ever made, nor I would do that for anything either as that's too subjective and culture dependant as KingStrategist explained.Listen
Bob
Everyone can like what they want to like
This is right and good
My senses only recoil when a person cannot admit that what they're liking is not actually the best thing ever made
It's never enough to say "I like this and it is good to me", it's "I like this and I need everyone to agree with me"
Sora's the only one like that, most other characters lean into tragedy/seriousness quite often, in fact Sora has to deal with some of that tragedy accidentally existing because of him and also endure the exact same pain the others had.Kingdom Hearts writers don't even seem to know what the hell is going on 99% of the time, it's written with forced toxic optimism bursting at the seams, with the only negative forces being corny and derivative to boot. like you don't need to like all the grotesque shit I do, I get it, my shit's really bad to most folk- but I'm not saying MORK BORG is the best written verse of all time. it is comically over the top and cartoonish in its depravity, that's the point. It's not well written. But just offer me something with depth, man, so many suggestions here are so ******* shallow.
and, of course, if saying that makes me old, well, there's a reason I get called old man in my twenties.
I've accepted that some people cannot be communicated with, shit happensBambu I've yet to see you make actual valid reasons as to why the characters mentioned aren't written well other than you making surface level at best judgments.
Ironic.I've accepted that some people cannot be communicated with, shit happens
tbf my ass has only played two games (that is, 1 and 2), and if the situation turned extremely differently afterwards then I'm content to never know, as the first two games were earnestly terribleIf you think the premise of KH is "Cheerful anime with Disney branding everywhere go against Disney villains", then that's quite incorrect, while originally that was the premise of the series in development, eventually the series was made to appeal to Final Fantasy fans by having a more serious tone with original villains mixed in too, in fact lately the villain Disney characters have been losing relevancy in place of original villains.
Nobody ever said Kingdom Hearts was the best thing ever made, that's literally against the point he was trying to make, please stop saying this shit and using big words and doubling down to make it look like you're right when you're far from it.Listen
Bob
Everyone can like what they want to like
This is right and good
My senses only recoil when a person cannot admit that what they're liking is not actually the best thing ever made
It's never enough to say "I like this and it is good to me", it's "I like this and I need everyone to agree with me"
Kingdom Hearts writers don't even seem to know what the hell is going on 99% of the time, it's written with forced toxic optimism bursting at the seams, with the only negative forces being corny and derivative to boot. like you don't need to like all the grotesque shit I do, I get it, my shit's really bad to most folk- but I'm not saying MORK BORG is the best written verse of all time. it is comically over the top and cartoonish in its depravity, that's the point. It's not well written. But just offer me something with depth, man, so many suggestions here are so ******* shallow.
and, of course, if saying that makes me old, well, there's a reason I get called old man in my twenties.
Whenever someone tells me that something like this is objective, that some characters are objectively better written than others, I always ask this question:A character with well fleshed out and complex emotions as well as proper development well developed motivations and goals good symbolism and character dynamics will always objectively be better written than a character who lacks these aspects
What's subjective is which character you prefer and which style of writing and type of development you like
Wasn't too big on JJK but Yuta's definitely one of my favorites from itAnyways, if we’re done arguing objectivity on a thread rooted in subjectivity, I vote Yuta Okkotsu for Tier 7 (because his tier is fluctuating and he’s either Low 7-C-7-B.)
Selfish, selfless, a lover in a world of fighters is the most dangerous of all: he personifies the human spirit.
That gif is fire ngl.Anyways, if we’re done arguing objectivity on a thread rooted in subjectivity, I vote Yuta Okkotsu for Tier 7 (because his tier is fluctuating and he’s either Low 7-C-7-B.)
Selfish, selfless, a lover in a world of fighters is the most dangerous of all: he personifies the human spirit.
Yes. But we aren't writing, we are reading what is written. To an extent, you can recognize something as more than it is- songs, for example, can have specific meanings to specific people deeper, perhaps, than the original writer intended or even could muster. That doesn't make it better written than it is, though.The beauty of writing is finding depth in damn near anything. I could see something as hilariously shallow while you may find a lot of depth to it. It's also very hypocritical of you to take issue with the "I like this and I need everyone to agree with me" mindset only to turn around and go "if you think of this character's writing in a different way than I do you're just wrong"
Proceeds to not elaborate as to why he thinks said characters are written shallowly.Characters can be, objectively, shallowly written. A lot of characters are. A lot of the ones in this thread are.
Not exactly. Using your example of songs, even if a song contains a deeper meaning beyond the original intentions of the writer, that doesn't matter. It's still a meaning that's conveyed through the writing of the songYes. But we aren't writing, we are reading what is written. To an extent, you can recognize something as more than it is- songs, for example, can have specific meanings to specific people deeper, perhaps, than the original writer intended. That doesn't make it better written than it is, though.
Characters can be, objectively, shallowly written. A lot of characters are. A lot of the ones in this thread are.
yes it does lol?Not exactly. Using your example of songs, even if a song contains a deeper meaning beyond the original intentions of the writer, that doesn't matter. It's still a meaning that's conveyed through the writing of the song
Indeed it is.That gif is fire ngl.
My undisputed favorite character. The movie propelled him to new heights for me. Gege truly made a masterpiece.Wasn't too big on JJK but Yuta's definitely one of my favorites from it
If you wanna continue with the mindset of "everyone but me doesn't get it" go ahead, I just think that's very close-mindedI think I just need to accept that y'all don't get it, man, I don't know how much more clearly I can relay this information
KHI may have aged like milk out of having rather unpolished gameplay compared to other titles and some early installment weirdness, but KHII to this day is still a really solid game, only real downside is that some parts of the plot are kinda fillertbf my ass has only played two games (that is, 1 and 2), and if the situation turned extremely differently afterwards then I'm content to never know, as the first two games were earnestly terrible
I'm not even debating atp, I'm just making goofy one-off comments.This conversation right here. It literally only serves to further prove the point; People will find depth and complexity where other's will find a shallow and empty story. Some people such as myself may find Kingdom Hearts to be a interesting dissection of theme's in regards to connection's, existence, and what it truly means to have a bit of "Light" and "Dark" in your heart (And how morality can be beyond these meager labels in certain instances), while other's may simply see the verse as a pile of toxic optimism and corny plots. That's simply how the very idea of a Well Written Character or story goes.
And in a sense, that's likely all this thread will continue to be; We will argue back and forth on whether or not a Character should even be considered for the list, all because of our own belief's on how good they may or may not be. Some of us may be Hypocritical about it, some of us might not. Some may change their opinion's, other's may choose to stand their ground. But the same can be said of all subjective topic's, if we're being honest.
That said, I do garner some entertainment from this all, admittedly. Seeing people debate back and forth on the extent that this subject is subjective. Hell, in a sense even that is subjective too, actually thinking about it.