- 10,499
- 11,547
Currently, the durability negation page states
Have we ever on any profile considered a regular laser as durability negation? I don't think so.
Really, the idea the example brings up goes more so in the direction of sharp weapons being more effective than blunt ones. Unless the laser is literally so focussed that it can specifically target singular electrons or something like that I don't think we would list it as durability negation.
So I would like to replace that example. I think poison would be good, as it is easy to understand why it circumvents durability and is a real-life thing everyone has a good grasp on.
So how about
which, if you ask me, is a terrible example.A good example of ignoring the strength would be a laser, which at negligible attack potency, easily cuts through thick steel sheets.
Have we ever on any profile considered a regular laser as durability negation? I don't think so.
Really, the idea the example brings up goes more so in the direction of sharp weapons being more effective than blunt ones. Unless the laser is literally so focussed that it can specifically target singular electrons or something like that I don't think we would list it as durability negation.
So I would like to replace that example. I think poison would be good, as it is easy to understand why it circumvents durability and is a real-life thing everyone has a good grasp on.
So how about
instead?A good example of ignoring durability would be poison, as it can kill a person without even needing to wound them.