Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Under this assumption we need to downgrade him as well. Becuase that means he physically cannot move as fast as he can see things.reaction speed >>>>travel speed
The same novel said his top speed was that of a jet.Are these gonna be considered PIS or are the bullet case gonna be considered as PIS?
Neither, because trying to say Quicksilver is Relativistic is like trying to scale Loki to the Bifrost's teleportation speed. It makes no sense.So relativistic while running? Or at full speed?
How would scaling to Loki make it odd?Fair, as scaling Valkyrie may cause lots of other to scale, like Loki or Captain America, which will make scaling odd.
I mean, not always I don’t think.I heard somewhere that seeing lightning in slow motion was a MFTL feat. Wouldn't that be kinda outlierish?
Reverse Uno card intensifiestfw a a downgrade turns into an upgrade.
How is this the same?Neither, because trying to say Quicksilver is Relativistic is like trying to scale Loki to the Bifrost's teleportation speed. It makes no sense.
Seeing lightning as slow motion should be FTL as shown in CW flash or superman in smallville seeing light from a camera as slow and rated FTL+.I heard somewhere that seeing lightning in slow motion was a MFTL feat. Wouldn't that be kinda outlierish?
The novel stated he can accelerate to close to light speed, we obviously can't ignore it.Neither, because trying to say Quicksilver is Relativistic is like trying to scale Loki to the Bifrost's teleportation speed. It makes no sense.
I've seen this happen few times here.tfw a a downgrade turns into an upgrade.
What is it with VSBW and turning upgrades into downgrades and vice versa???
Because its in the Astral Plane rather than the real world. Physics are different there.Question. Why do we not use the Ancient One perceiving lightning slowly when she talks to Strange?
That would just be speed through astral projection it shouldn't not be listed at allBecause its in the Astral Plane rather than the real world. Physics are different there.
Have you watched any of visions fights? the beams are never stated or show to have different firing speeds they're pretty consistent especially when u see them fired back to back, I'm not understanding where u keep getting this notion that some of these things don't keep consistent speeds when it's never stated or shown otherwiseVision's energy can be calced for speed, but you cannot get a rating from it unless you assume it was a constant set speed to it.
Because we are subconsciously spiteful af so when someone tries to change the status quo, we must flip it on its head and do the opposite.What is it with VSBW and turning upgrades into downgrades and vice versa???
Yes and it's still our policy that you cannot use a calced speed from one scene to calc another speed to a different scene. Calc stacking has more or less always been a rule.Have you watched any of visions fights?
If you want to calc it feel free to. But it scales to no one in a relevant way.astral projection it shouldn't not be listed at all
I mean we're still massively high balling their speeds. It's just that we're no longer doing so from travel speed calcs.Because we are subconsciously spiteful af so when someone tries to change the status quo, we must flip it on its head and do the opposite.
Who suggested calc stacking? This is literally one scene or heck even in this fight there is 1 consistent shot of the beams being fired back to back from one angle, there's literally no room for assumptions when we're literally being showed many time on screen during 1 scene repeated constant beam fire. Again calc stacking can't even apply here it's literally judging one scene where we're shown multiple beams being fired from one shot within the scene, there's no stacking calcs or feats from different scenes or shots because this only happens in 1 shotYes and it's still our policy that you cannot use a calced speed from one scene to calc another speed to a different scene. Calc stacking has more or less always been a rule.
If you want to scale people to the that's fine, but you cannot use the beam to get a speed calc unless you can prove it has a constant set rating.
If the beam does not have a stated or agreed upon base speed like Thor's lightning blasts, it would be calc stacking unless the beam's speed and the deflection/reaction feat happened in the same shot. You cannot scale the beam to say, Mach 2500 based on Wanda Vision then scale Glavie's reaction to the beam in Infinity War based on the assumption that its always Mach 2500.Who suggested calc stacking?
I think your missing my point again. Calcing the beam's speed is fine and scaling people to the beam is fine if they have the evidence for it. But what you can't do is use the beam in another speed calc to get a better rating, since that would be calc stacking if you cannot find a canon set speed for the beam.Again calc stacking can't even apply here it's literally judging one scene where we're shown multiple beams being fired from one shot within the scene
Which we doit would be calc stacking unless the beam's speed and the deflection/reaction feat happened in the same shot
And this was never suggested once by me so it's a moot point this whole time I've never once said to use this to get another calc or rating I've simply explained why the feat is usable and not calc stacking from the way it's presented. The reactions and firing of these beams all happens in one shot. If I could calc it I would've but I'm obviously not a member of the calc team nor do I know how to calc these feats, that's kinda obviously the reason I've put in multiple request for it to be calc'd (not to sound rude if I do)But what you can't do is use the beam in another speed calc to get a better rating, since that would be calc stacking if you cannot find a canon set speed for the beam.
If its the linked video you posted I'm mostly sure the reason why its never been calced is because its not a feat that will get an upgrade. Even if the beams covered 100 miles in some of those shots you're only looking at like, mach 480 for the beam's entire speed and at best a slightly better twitch movement from either vision.The reactions and firing of these beams all happens in one shot
Completely understandable but the point isn't for upgrades, verses need supporting feats and this is very clearly one them had this already been calc'd it would've helped regardless either way when clarifying the verse's speed feats even if it doesn't directly scale to how fast one character can move relative to their own attackIf its the linked video you posted I'm mostly sure the reason why its never been calced is because its not a feat that will get an upgrade. Even if the beams covered 100 miles in some of those shots you're only looking at like, mach 480 things for the beam's entire speed and at best a slightly better twitch movement from either vision.
Well as a basic overview I guessCompletely understandable but the point isn't for upgrades, verses need supporting feats and this is very clearly one them had this already been calc'd it would've helped regardless either way when clarifying the verse's speed feats even if it doesn't directly scale to how fast one character can move relative to their own attack
Why would visions beam be any slower then what has been shown before especially since he was pretty agro after he was awakenedYes and it's still our policy that you cannot use a calced speed from one scene to calc another speed to a different scene. Calc stacking has more or less always been a rule.
If you want to scale people to the that's fine, but you cannot use the beam to get a speed calc unless you can prove it has a constant set rating.
If you want to calc it feel free to. But it scales to no one in a relevant way.
I mean we're still massively high balling their speeds. It's just that we're no longer doing so from travel speed calcs.
Because that's calc stacking. Unless we have a set base speed to work from, both the feat and the reaction must occur in the same scene or its calc stacking.Why would visions beam be any slower then what has been shown
Thank you I appreciate the cooperation and help with the calc here and if you could walk me through this what would be needed to determine base speed, would you need multiple calc's of different scenes with multiple ends to find consistency among them or would it purely rely on statements and things that exist in the real world such as iron man's lasers being SOL or Thor's lightning being real lightningWell as a basic overview I guess
Assuming of course, they were in the dead center of town and fired at the longest possible distance. Other ratings will dump you down to single or low double digit mach.
- Westview has a PO of NJ 08801 which corresponds with the IRL area of Annadale NJ
- The beam in this scene travels from the forest to the edge of Wanda's dome in 4 milliseconds
- This IRL town at its longest point is around 3.5 kilometers
- 3,617.27 meters / 2 / 0.04 seconds = 45,215.875 m/s or Mach 131.824
Basically this. If there's a tech manual that states "The beams are light speed" or "Vision's energy blasts can cover 10 miles in under half a second" or something like that, you could use that speed to get a rating in any scene where a character reacts to the attack.would it purely rely on statements and things that exist in the real world such as iron man's lasers being SOL