Lacku
He/Him- 3,314
- 4,583
so does this mean were gonna upgrade our high 6-Cs to high 6-A now?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so does this mean were gonna upgrade our high 6-Cs to high 6-A now?
That's a big if.so are does this mean were gonna upgrade our high 6-Cs to high 6-A now?also possible high 6-A ms. marvel rating maybe
I think the Sling Rings are just High 6-A Environmental Destruction TBF.Upgrading Sling Rings to High 6-A could lead to a decent number of upgrades, considering how the Russos suggested that Thanos had skin too durable to be cut through by Strange's portals (at least not quickly enough to be a viable tactic)
idk I think it's pretty clear that when it closes it's akin to piercing damageI think the Sling Rings are just High 6-A Environmental Destruction TBF.
I get that, but I was more so talking about its ability to bring about High 6-A destruction that quickly, doesn't seem like something that's done fast but rather over time thing.idk I think it's pretty clear that when it closes it's akin to piercing damage
by destruction do you mean it for example cutting off cull obsidians arm or something else?I get that, but I was more so talking about its ability to bring about High 6-A destruction that quickly, doesn't seem like something that's done fast but rather over time thing.
I think it's goodHow about I put a draft together here in one post, based on only the things we seem to agree, then we all edit it a couple times here, then I post that agreed upon version as a CRT? Will need a few days to come back to this though.
Nah, I mean causing damage to the Earth's surface due to misuse or some other staff like that.by destruction do you mean it for example cutting off cull obsidians arm or something else?
The Bifrost was hitting Jotunheim from Asgard, which are in different galaxies. I get that VS Battles follows inverse square law, which does not work in this situation. But just logically, the energy required to damage anything from a galaxy away has to be astronomical.That's a big if.
You still have to deal with the biggest issue of the Bifrost beam not actually doing that kind of damage on Jotunheim.
personally I think clarifying that it's environmental destruction instead of just straight up giving it a rating is a bit redundant since even though it could probably damage the earth if misused it can damage things in other ways as well, if anything I think piercing damage would make more sense if you want to clarify the ratingNah, I mean causing damage to the Earth's surface due to misuse or some other staff like that.
I'd argue Thor wasn't hitting it at the source either, he was halfway at the bridge when he smacked it.The Bifrost was hitting Jotunheim from Asgard, which are in different galaxies. I get that VS Battles follows inverse square law, which does not work in this situation. But just logically, the energy required to damage anything from a galaxy away has to be astronomical.
Like it takes more energy to throw a baseball 300 feet than it takes to throw it 3 feet. There is no way the damage the Bifrost produced when it hit Jotunheim was equivalent to 100% of the energy the Bifrost released at the spot it fired from on Asgard.
The problem is that these two are not comparable in any meaningful way whatsoever, because the Bifrost at Asgard was used in combat purposes, the Bifrost at the Gateway to Eternity was not. Simply having the energy source at hand does not make your physicals automatically scale to its full power unless you can show that you are able to channel its power through yourself to further amplify yourself in order to fight stronger foes.If that were the case, it would mean the Gateway to Eternity requires the same amount of energy to open as it took to topple ice spires on Jotunheim. Does anyone here really believe that to be the case?
The Bifrost was firing for roughly the same amount of screen time at the climax of Thor 1 and Thor 4.I'd argue Thor wasn't hitting it at the source either, he was halfway at the bridge when he smacked it.
The problem is that these two are not comparable in any meaningful way whatsoever, because the Bifrost at Asgard was used in combat purposes, the Bifrost at the Gateway to Eternity was not. Simply having the energy source at hand does not make your physicals automatically scale to its full power unless you can show that you are able to channel its power through yourself to further amplify yourself in order to fight stronger foes.
How long it fires is irrelevant, if the intent for unleashing the beam is different. An energy source and its output yield can be the exact same yet they may not scale to AP at all if used in a certain way.The Bifrost was firing for roughly the same amount of screen time at the climax of Thor 1 and Thor 4.
Is there any evidence that the energy itself of the Bifrost is substantially different in type or magnitude for these two events? Not how the Bifrost was used. I mean the nature of its energy.
That is still too fundamentally far away for Thor to scale to the full value in any shape or form.Also, Thor was much closer to the source of the Bifrost (500 feet max) than Jotunheim (a galaxy away). So from a durability standpoint, it does seem like Thor should have been hit with more energy than Jotunheim was in Thor 1, per second.
Count me in for disagreement to using the Bifrost feat then.But if we don't have agreement on this, it will not make the CRT.
The Bifrost feat is absolutely not necessary for the CRT at all IMHO. The only reliable feat to go off here would be Zeus's scaling scenario to the Gods, Ra in particular.Is the Bifrost feat really necessary for the CRT? It's just something that was brought up at the last moment and has only been discussed for about a day, so if we agree on the rest, we can still make the CRT without using the Bifrost
"At least 5-B+, possibly at least 4-C" based on Khonshu?Seems like "At least Planet level+, possibly at least Star level" is most warranted
Ra (who should be comparable to Khonshu) and the Celestials"At least 5-B+, possibly at least 4-C" based on Khonshu?
I started to write the CRT while ignoring what I consider to be the elephant in the room, and I felt myself going a little bonkers. I'm not trying to piss anyone off here. But, just once, I would greatly appreciate it if you all just weigh here in with a simple Yes or No to this question:
DO YOU SEE STARS MOVING HERE?
YES or NO?
I started to write the CRT while ignoring what I consider to be the elephant in the room, and I felt myself going a little bonkers. I'm not trying to piss anyone off here. But, just once, I would greatly appreciate it if you all just weigh here in with a simple Yes or No to this question:
DO YOU SEE STARS MOVING HERE?
YES or NO?
Phase 3 should definitely not be backscaled to tier 4 from thisFrom what I understand, the internal logic of the site prohibits those feats from being counted (as clearly as they're shown onscreen) because it would so dramatically throw off the scaling of the other characters that shouldn't be near that level. I definitely think that Thor should be rated higher than he is, but would it make sense for a 4-C Bleeding Edge Iron Man in Infinity War to exist, or a 4-C Loki scaling to Cap or Valkyrie?
I definitely want Thor to get upgraded. He should get upgraded. I'm just no longer hopeful of getting any sort of admin approval for upgrades to Pre-L&T Thor.
That's what I'm saying. It would completely throw off the scaling for a significant portion of the versePhase 3 should definitely not be backscaled to tier 4 from this
I was wondering why it would do that based on the assumption you were talking about the L&T stuff, fortunately you gave some precisiosn thoughThat's what I'm saying. It would completely throw off the scaling for a significant portion of the verse
Edit: I'm specifically referring to using the Thor 1 star feat