- 671
- 739
That's also how I remember it
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
MCU Love & Thunder Spoiler Thread
- Thread starter ArkhamDC06
- Start date
- 9,163
- 13,744
- Thread starter
- #722
He probably shouldn't have Empowerment or a "higher" rating then
- 671
- 739
Solidly 4-C should be good enough. Are we thinking of making a page for the Necrosword as well?
- 2,304
- 2,734
He had the high ground
- 2,304
- 2,734
Just remembered, Captain Marvel did the same too in Endgame. She searched the entire planet for Thanos
- 671
- 739
Another random point for Gorr: During the fight on the shadow planet, he got hit directly by Stormbreaker at least once and got up right after, so there's a durability feat for him that dwarfs anything we saw Thanos do
- 6,827
- 6,711
His place in this movie already means he dwarfs Thanos anyway
- 9,163
- 13,744
- Thread starter
- #728
I'm planning on making a profile for it
- 12,304
- 11,259
You know, they should have made Gorr's sword look more like the blades Hela used if they're both going to be called Necroswords.
- 8,388
- 8,860
I like the design of Gorr's sword the way it is shown
- 9,163
- 13,744
- Thread starter
- #731
I have the feeling they didn't intend to use Gorr for Thor 4 and wanted to merge him with Hela in Ragnarok but after they decided Gorr would be the main villain for Love & Thunder, they tried to differenciate them by making Gorr's blade different and giving it some arthurian-like look. Which makes the fact that Hela's blades are named Necroswords weird (they should have gone for some sort of backstory for them, like saying Hela heard about the original blade and decided to name them like that in reference to the sword and her status as the Goddess of Death)
Last edited:
- 9,163
- 13,744
- Thread starter
- #732
I like it to to be honest, the other weapons in the MCU are massive, very large, this sword is very thin and has a unique look
- 8,416
- 10,661
So wait are we going 4-a or 4-c for these guys?
- 6,827
- 6,711
- 12,304
- 11,259
Yeah, at that point they could have reversed it and called Gorr's blade the Twilight Sword (Hela's sword).
- 6,827
- 6,711
Preferably they could've named Hela's weaponry "Twilight Blades"
- 12,304
- 11,259
That would have been the ideal thing to do, yeah. ngl, them calling Hela's blades Necroswords made me think Gorr was never going to appear in the MCU until I heard a rumor about it like a year before the first trailer.
- 671
- 739
Has anybody calced this before? It could be a good supporting feat for the Jane feat (although Jane Thor is way stronger hehe)
- 2,304
- 2,734
I did, but I assumed she just flew only half the circumference of the planet. It would yield the same value as Jane's one, if not higher, because Cap did it in less than a minute
MCU: Massively Hypersonic Captain Larson
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 671
- 739
Then I suppose the question is if she did search the entire planet or if she found him relatively quicklyI did, but I assumed she just flew only half the circumference of the planet. It would yield the same value as Jane's one, if not higher, because Cap did it in less than a minute
MCU: Massively Hypersonic Captain Larson
- 8,416
- 10,661
Why?
- 6,827
- 6,711
Because it scales to physicals
- 8,416
- 10,661
I thought we were going for 4-a because of Egyptian gods
- 6,827
- 6,711
4-A is via spatial manipulation
- 8,416
- 10,661
Then wouldn’t 4-c via creation or something?
- 6,827
- 6,711
4-C comes from the Celestials creating stars and effortlessly handling them, and Zeus scales above them since he's stated to be the most powerful being in Omnipotence City when there are two known Celestials at that location
- 8,416
- 10,661
Wouldn’t that be because of the lack of gravity of space or something? And even then I still don’t see why he wouldn’t be 4-a seeing as he is still more powerful then the Egyptian gods regardless of spatial manipulation
- 8,388
- 8,860
Wait, creation feats can't be able to be scaled to physicals?
- 6,827
- 6,711
They physically move their stars around. Plus they can handle their gravity
- 6,827
- 6,711
It's still iffy scaling Zeus who only has direct AP showings to 4-A performed via spatial manipulation. 4-C is more reasonable
- 8,416
- 10,661
His direct ap showings don’t go anywhere near 4-c though. The whole reason we’re even discussing him be in 4 tier is because of Thor’s statement. I don’t see why we don’t just go full on 4-a especially since his still considered more powerful then ra, the head of the Egyptian pantheon and god of the sun
- 671
- 739
Maybe we could go "At least 4-C, likely higher"
- 6,827
- 6,711
- 17,276
- 27,078
I mean celestials are just 4-C to begin with it's not just creation they explained to us how the cosmic energy they wield works in Eternals it scales to them physically anyways
- 9,163
- 13,744
- Thread starter
- #755
Depends on the context, if characters are able to show a similar level of power than with their creation feat (like say, creating a real-size duplicate of Earth and then handling the creation like a projectile or something), then they can, if not it's basically hax
- 6,827
- 6,711
That too, but given the function of cosmic energy, they're 4-C regardless
- 4,769
- 7,810
- 671
- 739
That does make sense. Was that point rejected in the past?
