- 17,295
- 27,106
Ah alrighty I can't tell which specific explosion is being used but there are nukes in that shot close to or on the horizon lineI remembered right
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah alrighty I can't tell which specific explosion is being used but there are nukes in that shot close to or on the horizon lineI remembered right
Which is fine, but it needs to use them and it needs to not use images so tiny that you would need a electron microscope to make out the pixel lines.there are nukes in that shot close to or on the horizon line
Welp it's open now sooo ya know we gotta run with it and also put this in the MCU discussion thread
Doesn't have tectonic plates I thinkDoes someone know why Thor shaking Jotunheim was rejected?
Can someone send the scan?
Then peak ground acceleration with Mercalli scale is our best bet.Doesn't have tectonic plates I think
I've responded.Here is the Low 6-B calc, very consistent with the Eternals
Apparently the scan is from the storybook, not the novel.I've responded.
Why are we using moon of small planets for Jotunheim calcs?Apparently the scan is from the storybook, not the novel.
Hm. If anyone can find the scan from the actual novel, that'd be greatApparently the scan is from the storybook, not the novel.
Why isn’t the storyboard usable?I forgot we stopped comparing Jotunheim and Europa due to lack of sources for that.
Hm. If anyone can find the scan from the actual novel, that'd be great
More like a couple of months agoBruh i thought this CRT came out 4 days
What storyboard?Why isn’t the storyboard usable?
Mb I meant storybookWhat storyboard?
So the statement is unusable?Apparently the scan is from the storybook, not the novel.
Not sure. If it's from Marvel themselves and it doesn't contradict the movie, then it should be usable.So the statement is unusable?
It is written by Marvel and the same person who wrote the Thor novelisationNot sure. If it's from Marvel themselves and it doesn't contradict the movie, then it should be usable.
But we'd still need the novel statements first.
No, it just wouldn't get anything good. Its been calculated before based off of a carbon program and its not anything notable compared to his current ratings.Why we don't used Thanos crushing
Tersarac feat ?
outlier ?
If the planet is ice then it can't be assumed to have the Earth's mass. It would not only be less dense but lack a lot of stuff that add's to the weight like a metal alloyed core.Jotunheim is described as a planet so I'll use Earth's mass (5.97217e24 kg)
So what could I use?If the planet is ice then it can't be assumed to have the Earth's mass. It would not only be less dense but lack a lot of stuff that add's to the weight like a metal alloyed core.
Probably one of DMUA's suggestions or find assume ice-like density rather than iron-likeSo what could I use?
Why not try Earth volume, slap 80% hollowness on, then multiply said volume with ice density?Probably one of DMUA's suggestions or find assume ice-like density rather than iron-like
Was about to say that.