• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Marvel Comics: Possible Yggdrasil Upgrade - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Derailing the Low 1-A stuff for a bit shouldn't really be a problem

also i honestly don't remember Low 1-C ever being proposed untill now
 
It wasn't everyone who rejected, just some that didn't take it. And i never act it's not, everyone here is just waiting for you to do your part.
 
Matthew only said that there is no actual consensus here.
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
The transcendence over the multiverse stuff isn't accepted by everyone. Don't act like this is irrefutable o b j e c t i v e evidence.
Click to expand...
It's a void beyond creation, stated by both Odin and Rune King Thor, so i don't see how it wouldn't be trascendental
 
Isn't that shown in only one story that probably isn't even part of the same storyline as Rune King Thor ?
 
The original Ragnarok story only portrayed Thor as transcending his father Odin and breaking a cyclical loop placed on the 9 worlds in the first place. Nothing remotely indicated Low 1-A or 1-A.
 
It was not only 9 worlds, nor is there a scan saying that there were only 9 worlds, a scan of infinite parallel realities has already been presented in that same storyline in the previous threads.

Thor had already transcended Odin in several chapters before that, in contexts after Odin was killed by surtur, and Thor had a more powerful Odin force than Odin himself, due to the eons he kept her.

Thor of Ragnarok is an old Thor who came from an future and merged with his 2 versions of the present.

In history it does not show Thor transcending Odin, shows him transcending TWSAIS and Yggdrasil. The only thing that shows about Odin and Thor in history is the ethics of a God adopted by Odin, that the Odin force comments on, but she herself states that it has nothing to do with power.
 
I personally agree that 2-C is far too low for Rune King Thor, and the infinite parallel realities or infinite quantum universes is 2-A. And transcending above that is Low 1-C; but I'm still in agree meant with Matt and Antvasima that Low 1-A or 1-A still seems iffy.
 
I don't mind 2-A or Low 1-C, but Low 1-A or 1-A is such an extreme upgrade that it doesn't make any sense with the context of the original story.
 
I'm not interested in restarting this endlessly circular "no it isn't"ism with people in here, sorry.

I already made my summary and replied to all the relevant points people tried to use, so at this stage, I'd appreciate that people attempted to actually argue or make a response, since that's what we have been waiting for over a month by now.
 
Would you be willing to make another attempt Matthew? I would appreciate it.
 
It sounds more like Kepekley wants the refute to be multiple paragraphs long, organized and backed up by multiple scans is what he's really asking.
 
Rune Thor is one story, those that sit above in shadows are in more and they are part of the storyline
 
I'd prefer it if Rune King Thord didn't stay as below frikkin Cosmic Cubes for another entire year
 
I mean RKT is obviously 2-A to Low 1-C I'm confident enough to say everyone here agrees on that, but I don't blame Kep for trying to get Low 1-A (or one A)


"It sounds more like Kepekley wants the refute to be multiple paragraphs long, organized and backed up by multiple scans is what he's really asking."

And yeah I would like that too so far opposition have been repeating a lot of the same things and the thread already feels convoluted it would be nice if they would also post scans of why they don't agree with any of this.

Also this as to be settled at some point this is literally 3 thread long and we are nearing 4.
 
This will be ignored until the new forum deletes everything. Since no one will send anything against the position of kepekley23.
 
Well, I would also prefer if Matthew responds to this. If he does not, we will likely have to apply this, even though it doesn't seem to make any sense, given that PrinceOfTheMorning and ClassicNESfan have both almost turned inactive.
 
That said, I still do not think that it makes sense that Thor ascended to the level of The Beyonders simply from going a bit further in an ascension ritual than Odin did.
 
I mean, in the history TWSAIS is portrayed been probably the beyonders or the writer itself. Is pretty blatant the 1-A scalling.

Beyonderandloki
 
Loki was just speculating about 3 possible explanations though. Either they were created by the beliefs of the Asgardians, or they were the creator-gods of the Asgardians, or they were Beyonders.
 
And in the three existence they're above the multiverse. So it's still pretty blatant as 1-A.
 
There is no evidence to the contrary, about their transcendental existence above the multiverse.

Lokitestment
 
The word "Multiverse" isn't really consistent either as everything 2-C and above is called a multiverse. We got 2-A multiverses inside a Low 1-C multiverse, which plenty of those are inside a bigger Low 1-C multiverse, and plenty of those are inside a 1-C multiverse and so on. Not every use of the word Multiverse is referring to the High 1-B structure.
 
You just need to see the context, the beyonders are now low 2-C by destroying the entire multiverse?

A: No, the destruction of the multiverse in their comic that is the same as Loki: Agent of Asgard is Low 1-A.

Where void TWSAIS are in the comic?

A: The outside that exist beyond Far Shore. And if you look our Marvel Profiles, beings like eternity just by covering Far Shore is 1-A

This is a Low 1-A transcendence, which means 1-A, it's not a random word, just see the context of secret wars.
 
Odin has met many and many times with Universal Eternity, so his definition of "all realities" would definitelly at least extend up to that
 
@Overlord775 And what does one have to do with the other?

Universal eternity is only universal, it has no contains all realities, just one.
 
We count The Beyonders as Low 1-A individually though, not 1-A.
 
Overlord775 said:
It's just to raise the lowest possible end from 2-C to 2-A, possibly Low 1-C
Click to expand...
Yeah feel like they should at least have 2-A to possibly Low 1-C (for now).


Also responding to Mathew Zeus was ALWAYS considered an equal to Odin ita the whole reason why he was created and it was made to be thematic back then (Thor=Hercules, Odin=Zeus) he always been considered a top tier skyfather.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

ObberGobb
Marvel: Big Yggdrasil Downgrade, Skyfather Upgrades, and Thor Revisions
5 6 7
Replies
272
Views
21K
ObberGobb
ObberGobb
TyphonEX
  • Locked
God of War Dimensional Downgrade Part 1(???): The Yggdrasil
2 3
Replies
100
Views
8K
Theglassman12
Theglassman12
KingNanaya
Kentucky Ballistics (Grand Summoners CRT)
Replies
19
Views
883
KingNanaya
KingNanaya
Fwyzzverse
  • Locked
  • Article Article
Possible upgrade Outerverse God of War ?
Replies
28
Views
3K
CurrySenpai
CurrySenpai
VeryGoofyToddler2
Marvel Comics Cosmology (World Hierarchy) Revision
2 3
Replies
106
Views
7K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top