Leftovers from Kirby revisions

[Eseseso]

Dragon's calculation but with the new diameter

Moon Diameter = 17649.0457185km = 17649045.7185 meters = 269 px

17649045.7185 / 269 = 65609.8353848 meters per px

Crater Diameter = 154.77 px = 10154434.2225 meters

Crater Radius = 1999236.83 / 2 = 5077217.11125 meters

Crater Depth = 110.69 px = 7262352.67874 meters

Crater Volume (Half-Ellipsoid) = ((4/3) * pi * r^2 *depth) / 2 = 3.920915e+20 meters^3 = 3.92091499999999967e+26 cc

Pulverization of Rock = 214.35 Joules/cc

Crater Destruction = v * 214.35 = 8.4044813e+28 Joules or 20.087 exatons (High 6-A+)

There was also an explosion, as you can see, that can be calculated. The same meters per px value applies.



Explosion Diameter = 520 px = 34117114.4001meters

Explosion Radius = 34117114.4001/ 2 = 17058557.2meters

Moon Radius = d / 2 = 8824522.85925 meters

Moon mass = 9.6140898e+27 gram

Moon GBE = 4.195e+32 Joules

Cosmic Explosion Formula = 4 * (GBE of Celestial Body at Edge of Explosion) * (Explosion Radius / Radius of Celestial Body at Edge of Explosion)

Cosmic Explosion = 4 * 4.195e+32 * (17058557.2/ 8824522.85925) = 3.2437175e+33Joules = 7.75267088910133905e+23 tons or 868.2991395793499 Zettatons (5-B, maybe +)

Excellent work, although a 5-B+ is actually 1.38 yottatons, over 1.5x your cosmic explosion

 

[Eficiente]

Wait, let's pause for a second. I'll apply everything accepted in the OP of this thread, then I'll make a new thread, and then we will go over all this new stuff, ok? This should take be 3 days at worst.

 

[CloverDragon03]

Wait, let's pause for a second. I'll apply everything accepted in the OP of this thread, then I'll make a new thread, and then we will go over all this new stuff, ok? This should take be 3 days at worst.

Alright. I suggest that once you're done applying changes, make the new thread and post it in here before closing this one so we can all jump to that new thread

 

[Eseseso]

Wait, let's pause for a second. I'll apply everything accepted in the OP of this thread, then I'll make a new thread, and then we will go over all this new stuff, ok? This should take be 3 days at worst.

Agreed.

My apologies for being at least partially responsible for this thread getting out of hand.

 

[CloverDragon03]

I know we needed to pause but I feel this is important. It doesn't change any specific tiers, but it actually would quantify them and also gives a very good supporting 4-B feat

I calculated Magolor spinning the battlefield

 

[Eseseso]

I know we needed to pause but I feel this is important. It doesn't change any specific tiers, but it actually would quantify them and also gives a very good supporting 4-B feat

I calculated Magolor spinning the battlefield

Nice job!

 

[CloverDragon03]

Nice job!

Guys I tried a new end and it's 3-B lord please help

 

[Arceus0x]

Guys I tried a new end and it's 3-B lord please help

if this ends up going through we're gonna have one of if not the highest 3-B verse of all

 

[CloverDragon03]

if this ends up going through we're gonna have one of if not the highest 3-B verse of all

The math was accepted for every single end, including the 3-B and Multi-Galactic LS ends, so I guess we've just gotta decide on what to use in a CRT

 

[Arceus0x]

So, as a last bit before we move on to a different thread...

The tier we get if we use the highest ends (which makes sense) is
5-A | 3-B, likely 2-C | At least 3-B, likely 2-C
with the second 3-B scaling 4x above the feat you have.
That is of course unless we bring back the 120x multiplier in which case we'd get even higher ends.

The math was accepted for every single end, including the 3-B and Multi-Galactic LS ends, so I guess we've just gotta decide on what to use in a CRT

what do you think of the math i did above, the re-calc of your calc?

 

[CloverDragon03]

So, as a last bit before we move on to a different thread...

The tier we get if we use the highest ends (which makes sense) is
5-A | 3-B, likely 2-C | At least 3-B, likely 2-C
with the second 3-B scaling 4x above the feat you have.
That is of course unless we bring back the 120x multiplier in which case we'd get even higher ends.


what do you think of the math i did above, the re-calc of your calc?

Well it really depends on if we accept that moon size

 

[Arceus0x]

Well it really depends on if we accept that moon size

yeah i guess, if i made a calc tommorow would you review it? I'll just add the math and pixel scaling to it

 

[Kflare63]

and are we finally going to get pre cc keys for dedede and meta knight?

 

[Eficiente]

Guys I tried a new end and it's 3-B lord please help

Well, 2 things

• The dimensions in AD are universes, he moved some parts of the dimension which is what we see. So what the assumption brings is much the same but the assumption isn't correct and the wording should be changed.
• There is a good number of stars there but not as much as in a starry night, does this change the result?

 

[CloverDragon03]

Well, 2 things

• The dimensions in AD are universes, he moved some parts of the dimension which is what we see. So what the assumption brings is much the same but the assumption isn't correct and the wording should be changed.
• There is a good number of stars there but not as much as in a starry night, does this change the result?

I can change the wording. As for the second point, I don't believe so, as we see multiple stars and the starry night thing is based on the average distance someone can see a star from at night, which I believe is appropriate to use for the horizontal distance (the "radius" of the "cylinder")

 

[CloverDragon03]

Okay, I've updated the wording. So given that the math has been accepted for everything, we'll just need to settle what ends to use. 3-B AP and Multi-Galactic LS is fine by me

 

[Arceus0x]

https://vsbattles.com/threads/kirby-tier-revision-discussion.136243/

i made a thread for the tiers, efi can finish this thread and we can move here to discuss tiers

 

[Eficiente]

The idea was to not overwhelm myself, hence I said I woud make that thread, I would of course keep up with that thread just like I was doing with this one. Ideally, you should have just respected and waited me to finish this, had it all dealt with, and made that thread like I said I would.

 

[Arceus0x]

The idea was to not overwhelm myself, hence I said I woud make that thread, I would of course keep up with that thread just like I was doing with this one. Ideally, you should have just respected and waited me to finish this, had it all dealt with, and made that thread like I said I would.

then please move the thread i made to general discussion threads so we can discuss it and work on new calcs.

 

[Eficiente]

https://vsbattles.com/threads/kirby-revisions-everything-coming-full-circle.136345/