Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think there are definitely different views on the topic, even among staff members.Well, I think that we have 1 million views as a minimum for original works that have only been published via public internet sites.
500 reviews on a single entry for a self-published novel on Amazon seems "to at least reach the bare-bones minimum requirements". Which, obviously, isn't all that great for that particular verse, but in comparison, the one we're currently discussing is miles above it in terms of popularity.It's certainly pushing it in terms of notoriety, I think. A few hundred ratings on any given site isn't tons, although it's also a lot different than other media sources we review these things by. For what it's worth, I passed along the review counts to Agnaa, and he said he was inclined to allow it for 500 on a single entry (the highest here being 496).
I would not be surprised if this ends up getting deleted, but without knowing shit about it aside from what's available publicly and online, it seems to meet the absolute barebones minimum requirements.
Could you ping some staff members like Agnaa to get their opinion on the case?Well, I think that our safeguard popularity cutoff is 1 million views, so you likely need to wait for a while longer until it reaches that threshold, and Amazon is much harder to gauge.
I don't think it's talking about the case of webnovels, though? Because, assuming this is true, it would mean that a single chapter of a webnovel has to reach one million views? This is clearly not feasible for most webnovels, even some popular ones. Also, we're assuming that those "views" are genuine, but website like Webnovel.com massively inflate the views due to how their systems works.Editing Rules:
"For content published on YouTube, or online content for which one can expect similar viewer numbers to be equally reasonable to reach, we require that at least one entry in the canon has at least 1 million views on its own. This doesn't apply for entries created by bigger companies and for entries for which no viewer numbers can be determined. The former are generally allowed, while for the latter, case-by-case consideration is required."
So, it would need the novel to reach 1 million views total for it to be allowed, correct?From what I recall, we had a long staff discussion in which we decided to apply this safeguard, in order to not allow enormous amounts of unpopular low-quality works that almost nobody has heard about or is able to verify into our wiki.
My apologies, but I have reached a decision here.
Nah, that's insane. By that metric, I'm sure there are some webnovels currently indexed that should disappear.Well, not for all of its chapters combined obviously. One of its chapters needs that many views.
Since there are fewer people who speak Korean than speak English, I think the view milestone should be adjusted accordingly, as 1 million was chosen for English.Well, not for all of its chapters combined obviously. One of its chapters needs that many views.
And both you and I agreed with it.As mentioned in this thread I think there are a number of tricky challenges with such a flat number for a wide variety of different content.
I suppose a rule like that can work, but I would prefer to use a formulation that has a stronger emphasis that this is for media that can be considered equivalent in all considerations to English YouTube. In the current formulation, one may argue that anything that faithfully counts votes isn't included in under-representation, but I would argue that applying that to a Japanese novel, with Japanese speakers being just 10% as many as English speakers, makes for a bad measure of notability.
I'm also not sure if we generally would want to apply the same standards to novels and videos. Novels sell less on average and get less "casual views" as they are a greater time investment. What is outstanding for a novel in viewership may be underwhelming for a video.
This also needs a clause regarding works with no view count at all.
If this is a number that we'll ultimately have to work with, depending on if it's agreed upon, I'd say it's extremely more reasonable, although that particular novel doesn't reach that requirement regardless.For Korean, that would change the requirement to 53,465 views for one chapter.
Ant, I think that you may have too many expectations regarding webnovels. Let's take an example. Royalroad is one of the few websites that are popular for publishing online novels.If a webnovel has, for example, 100 chapters, I think that it would be excessively lenient, and as such lead to unreliability, to only require 1 million/100 = 10,000 views per chapter or some even more lenient method adjusted to the population size of something published in, for example, the Falkland Islands, or by the number of speakers of the following languages, to use exaggeration in order to make my point about such a rule proposal.
I dont think this stops anyone from just checking out the novel if they really want to see if the information is truly legit or not. Probably not even that hard just go on a website go to the novel and click a chapter as long as it's properly referenced. I'm sure a good bit of verses on this wiki dont have a lot of people who know about them. It's also just objectively not fan work (something which isnt allowed anyways) if it's an original setting.Well, maybe a somewhat lower threshold for webnovels might be reasonable then, but the big problem in this case is verifiability. If something is so obscure that only one or two of our members have read something, that causes longterm problems for the reliability of the information in our wiki as a whole, and we also do not want to spam our site with unpopular fan works.
I think that problem is kinda inevitable. Most published books in the world wouldn't actually be known by multiple active users on this site. Conversely, I was able to find another user who knew a series whose most popular installment only had 83k views. We just have demographics that draw fans of certain series and not others.Well, maybe a somewhat lower threshold for webnovels might be reasonable then, but the big problem in this case is verifiability. If something is so obscure that only one or two of our members have read something, that causes longterm problems for the reliability of the information in our wiki as a whole
We exclude those with other rules.and we also do not want to spam our site with unpopular fan works.
I'm glad you're okay with the idea of changing the current requirement, thank you.Well, maybe a somewhat lower threshold for webnovels might be reasonable then, but the big problem in this case is verifiability
I strongly agree with this. Although, I have to say that there are already some measures in place to limit such a thing.If something is so obscure that only one or two of our members have read something, that causes longterm problems for the reliability of the information in our wiki as a whole, and we also do not want to spam our site with unpopular fan works
If you're asking about the one I sent you as an example, we can't see the singular chapter views, only the total of the novel and the "average numbers of views". As you can see here, the average views are around 35K.Just to check, how many views does the chapter for this webnovel with the highest amount of views have?
Hmm. That really isn't much. My fanfiction story was quite obscure, and even that reached several thousand views per chapter. Very popular fanfiction stories vastly eclipse 35,000 views per chapter.If you're asking about the one I sent you as an example, we can't see the singular chapter views, only the total of the novel and the "average numbers of views". As you can see here, the average views are around 35K.
Fanfictions, by their definition, will naturally attract more people to it. It can't be said to be the same for original works, since those writers have no basis for their target audience. Also, I do not know which website you used to write and post your story on, but it's also totally possible that some of them inflate the views due to their inner-system.Hmm. That really isn't much. My fanfiction story was quite obscure, and even that reached several thousand views per chapter. Very popular fanfiction stories vastly eclipse 35,000 views per chapter.
Are you sure we can't put in place other requirements instead of a hard cold "view number" ?Well, I suppose that we might be able to lessen our requirement to 100,000 views for the initial chapter of webnovels if what you say is accurate
I understand this, but I feel like there is still much to discuss. We can maybe just wait for Agnaa instead of back and forth so that it spare you time and stress.I also do not remotely have the available time to argue here forever about this.
This has gotta be some form of subtle discrimination, cause what do you mean we can't have BoBoiBoy on this website cause you don't live in Malaysia? Or El Chavo del Ocho because you don't live in Mexico?Hmm. We do aim for an international audience, so I personally disagree with that adjustment. It would swarm us with works from, for example my own language of Swedish, which only has 10 to 11 million speakers, that almost none of our members have heard of or are able to verify if the information in our pages is reliable, and preventing that is a large part of the entire point of our rule.
Also, i think its important to mention that its actually pretty much possible to be aware if the verse is 'unrealiable' alone just by looking at the content of the profile, usually the verses made by random powerscalers are high tiered and almost like a CTRL C + CTRL V of our Tiering System and usually have a terrible writing and low ratingsThis has gotta be some form of subtle discrimination, cause what do you mean we can't have BoBoiBoy on this website cause you don't live in Malaysia? Or El Chavo del Ocho because you don't live in Mexico?
Notoriety is heavily dependant on region and culture. The average Brazillan kid probably knows who Kamen Rider Black is but can't tell you who The Doctor is.
Setting this completely arbitrary standard on the basis of being "international" ironically makes us less diverse.
The average Brazillan kid probably knows who Kamen Rider Black is but can't tell you who The Doctor is.
That is not what I meant. I just meant that we cannot lessen our restrictions just because some languages have fewer people speaking them.This has gotta be some form of subtle discrimination, cause what do you mean we can't have BoBoiBoy on this website cause you don't live in Malaysia? Or El Chavo del Ocho because you don't live in Mexico?
Notoriety is heavily dependant on region and culture. The average Brazillan kid probably knows who Kamen Rider Black is but can't tell you who The Doctor is.
Setting this completely arbitrary standard on the basis of being "international" ironically makes us less diverse.
I suppose that these seem like valid points.Also, i think its important to mention that its actually pretty much possible to be aware if the verse is 'unrealiable' alone just by looking at the content of the profile, usually the verses made by random powerscalers are high tiered and almost like a CTRL C + CTRL V of our Tiering System and usually have a terrible writing and low ratings
And even if somehow the stuff I mentioned are overlooked, it's quite simple to prove that the verse is unreliable, it takes just a single person to read it and make a CRT showing the proofs that it should be indeed deleted, nobody would oppose its deletion
Usually, stories made by powerscalers already have shady starting points, Hybrid Mage is an example of this, a novel writer by a powerscaler and the second chapter is like this, just skimming through the initial chapters is enough, these 2 screenshots are from second chaptersof the novel, its quite easy to notice when a novel was written just to be used in batteboarding plataformsI suppose that these seem like valid points.