• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Kirby vs SCP-871

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kaltias said:
WeeklyBattles said:
It doesnt regenerate from anything in the first place, it just makes duplicates
Click to expand...
The quote doesn't say that tho
Click to expand...
When any instance of SCP-871 is consumed by a human or a collection of humans, it is replaced approximately 24 hours afterward with a similar cake. This cake will appear on a flat surface in the vicinity of the location where the previous instance was eaten. If any of these cakes is substantially damaged through any means other than being eaten by a human, including being eaten by a non-human animal, it will be replaced instantaneously.

Yes it does
 
FateAlbane said:
Cake has no feats of coming back after being transmutated.
Therefore we have no reasons to think it will keep functioning as it should once it gets transmutated into something else (like every other character who gets transmutated and loses their powers as a result since they don't have resistance).

Hence, Kirby wins.
Click to expand...
/\ Gets transmutated >>> Will not keep functioning as it should, like pretty much anything which gets transmutated. >>> Loses.
 
FateAlbane said:
/\ Gets transmutated >>> Will not keep functioning as it should, like pretty much anything which gets transmutated. >>> Loses.
Click to expand...

^Gets transmuted >>> Makes a duplicate as it would >>> Inconclusive
 
Yes. That's saying that you eat the cake, and the cake reappears back where it was.

Not that it's a duplicate instead of Regenerationn. Or that it recognizes transmutation as damage
 
0 feats to back that up makes that argument into an NLF. Transmutated characters can't use their powers unless they have feats/resistance.
 
Well.


That's what happens.


I wonder if I can get away with Bolas vs the cake.......
 
Did...did you just give Kudos to a post going against your argument?

It-it can happen! OvO
 
> Doesn't have feats suggesting it can duplicate after being transmutated

> Transmutation is incap and not physical damage

> "It duplicates"

This is why.
 
It is not.

Now, let me ask you this again: where in 871's page is it stated it duplicates if it isn't a cake anymore?
 
By the same logic you are using, we should be assuming any character out there can still use their powers just fine when transmutated into whatever else.

As long as the cake has no feats or resistances to back that up, it is an NLF because you're taking that "any means" to NLFish extremes.

It's the exact same kind of reasoning as "Saitama oneshots because he can One Punch anyone".
 
If any of these cakes is substantially damaged through any means other than being eaten by a human, including being eaten by a non-human animal, it will be replaced instantaneously.
 
This is actually that simple case of "No feats of resistance, it works."

Unless we see some feat of the cake working normally and using its power after being transmutated into something else, I'm pretty sure basically everyone in the thread right now sans Weekly agreed that it is NLF.
 
Fine, i'll concede for now because i really dont care enough to keep repeating myself

Also, why would Kirby transmute a cake when in character he would eat it...?
 
We have all proven why it is. You just say it isn't and debate through circular logic. Everyone has already answered your original quote, it means nothing.

Specially since that is an in-universe classification by fallible humans, who do not know what would happen if people from other fictional universes ate the cake.

It is not reliable. All that it means is "The SCP-Foundation doesn't know how to dispose of it other than eating it."
 
Matthew Schroeder said:
We have all proven why it is. You just say it isn't and debate through circular logic. Everyone has already answered your original quote, it means nothing.
Specially since that is an in-universe classification by fallible humans, who do not know what would happen if people from other fictional universes ate the cake.

It is not reliable. All that it means is "The SCP-Foundation doesn't know how to dispose of it other than eating it."
Click to expand...


Thats a bit of a oversimplification, but yeah, no feats, no resistance
 
Question. When did Mid-Godly regen suddenly give resistance to transmutation? It isn't damage, as it's done by other means such as magic. Damage implies physical harm, but if you transmute something then you're not harming it. It's hax, you're changing the very structure of it. I'm not even sure where the cake gets Mid-Godly regen, isn't infinitely coming back from being eaten only low-high? and I feel like it's an NLF to say that the cake can come back from say, Zen'Os erase despite showing nothing of the sort. Why're we taking the cake's Regenerationn description literally when we cast so much doubt on every one series ever?
 
Because 871 apparently "duplicates". Even if nothing suggests it.

Also, 871 doesn't even HAVE Regenerationn. It just duplicates. Literally.
 
I still dont get why Kirby would do something out of character like transmute a cake instead of eat it though
 
I mean, technically if Kirby eats it then it's BFR'd since Kirby doesn't really.... digest stuff. Just an endless void of nothingness. I mean even if the Cake would eventually grow to such a number that Kirby dies via massive stomach ache, I'm pretty sure the cap for BFR wins would've been surpassed a LOOOOOOONG time ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Rose_of_Ragnarok
  • Locked
Infinite power vs. Infinite adapting - Kirby vs. SCP-682
Replies
20
Views
3K
Kirinator07
Kirinator07
AmogusSusfunni
Two Extremely similar 11-A civilizations fight each other (SCP-6011-1 vs. Flatland) (GRACE)
Replies
15
Views
2K
AmogusSusfunni
AmogusSusfunni
Hsharpe
SCP-2747 VS C.A.S.
Replies
8
Views
3K
AThe1412
AThe1412
TegamiBachi25
An edge lord fights another edge lord (SCP 076 vs Albert Wesker
Replies
24
Views
2K
TegamiBachi25
TegamiBachi25
Starter_Pack
  • Locked
Local Bird Attacks Little Fox (Opila Bird vs. SCP-1294)
Replies
2
Views
946
Starter_Pack
Starter_Pack
Back
Top