- 11,134
- 14,116
According to King Boo's profile, we treat the white dots in the background of the realms created by him as actual stars. Here's a video where he can be seen creating a dimension and if you look closely, shiny dots can be seen in the background.
From the Creation Feats page:
1. I checked through the previous threads and did not find any evidence that suggested they are real stars. "But they are dots in a black background so they automatically mean stars" is not an argument that can be used here since we can see that the dimension does not resemble real life outer space. The entire space seems warped and distorted with weird pink swirls and dark blue clouds all across the dimension. If it's not like actual outer space, we have no reason to assume the dots are actual stars. They seem to be part of the aesthetic. With that and the standards in mind, we'd need some good reason to assume they are actual stars.
2. Here, here, here, here and in the entire video, we see that the whole background (along with the shiny dots and dark blue cloud looking things) is continuously in rotational motion (you'll need max brightness to see the dots). If you look closely, you'll see the sparkly dots move exactly in conjunction with the dark blue clouds, owing to the fact that they are part of the same background and the "stars" are not lightyears in the back. I don't need to explain that actual stars in outer space don't appear to be in rotational motion at such MFTL+ speeds to an observer. Which adds to the first point of why we shouldn't assume the background as literal balls of fire in a space.
From the above two points, it should be clear that it takes far more assumption to say that King Boo created a realm that does not look like actual space but houses actual stars that he always keeps in a continuous rotational motion at MFTL+ speeds only to fight Luigi on a stage which is smaller than a tennis court. The obvious solution here, supported by Occam's razor, is that it's just a cool looking moving background.
I propose that this be treated as invalid, and should not be used to support any 4-A level creation. Its mention should be removed from King Boo's page.
As for King Boo's Low 2-C rating, it is based on this. The context seems to be that King Boo creates a portal which releases large hoard of ghosts and increase the paranormality. Once the paranormal readings go above a certain limit, it threatens to destroy the dimension by collapsing on itself.
There seems to be some confusion regarding this, so I'll ask here. What is the term "our dimension" referring to here? It's very odd to call our universe as "dimension". Does it mean something else?
Secondly, if it means the universe, the collapse due to increasing paranormality and instability implies an overtime/chain reaction destruction, not a one-shot. Moreover, King Boo doesn't have enough power to one shot a universe by himself, his only feat here is making a portal which initializes the process. As such, the Low 2-C rating should probably be removed from his profile as it is very misleading.
From the Creation Feats page:
The first obvious requirement is that it must be certain that an actual creation feat took place. If, for example, stars appear to have been created it must be certain that those aren't just minor light sources looking similar.
1. I checked through the previous threads and did not find any evidence that suggested they are real stars. "But they are dots in a black background so they automatically mean stars" is not an argument that can be used here since we can see that the dimension does not resemble real life outer space. The entire space seems warped and distorted with weird pink swirls and dark blue clouds all across the dimension. If it's not like actual outer space, we have no reason to assume the dots are actual stars. They seem to be part of the aesthetic. With that and the standards in mind, we'd need some good reason to assume they are actual stars.
2. Here, here, here, here and in the entire video, we see that the whole background (along with the shiny dots and dark blue cloud looking things) is continuously in rotational motion (you'll need max brightness to see the dots). If you look closely, you'll see the sparkly dots move exactly in conjunction with the dark blue clouds, owing to the fact that they are part of the same background and the "stars" are not lightyears in the back. I don't need to explain that actual stars in outer space don't appear to be in rotational motion at such MFTL+ speeds to an observer. Which adds to the first point of why we shouldn't assume the background as literal balls of fire in a space.
From the above two points, it should be clear that it takes far more assumption to say that King Boo created a realm that does not look like actual space but houses actual stars that he always keeps in a continuous rotational motion at MFTL+ speeds only to fight Luigi on a stage which is smaller than a tennis court. The obvious solution here, supported by Occam's razor, is that it's just a cool looking moving background.
I propose that this be treated as invalid, and should not be used to support any 4-A level creation. Its mention should be removed from King Boo's page.
As for King Boo's Low 2-C rating, it is based on this. The context seems to be that King Boo creates a portal which releases large hoard of ghosts and increase the paranormality. Once the paranormal readings go above a certain limit, it threatens to destroy the dimension by collapsing on itself.
There seems to be some confusion regarding this, so I'll ask here. What is the term "our dimension" referring to here? It's very odd to call our universe as "dimension". Does it mean something else?
Secondly, if it means the universe, the collapse due to increasing paranormality and instability implies an overtime/chain reaction destruction, not a one-shot. Moreover, King Boo doesn't have enough power to one shot a universe by himself, his only feat here is making a portal which initializes the process. As such, the Low 2-C rating should probably be removed from his profile as it is very misleading.
Last edited: