- 11,411
- 2,547
Pretty sure he didn't meant that way.In an argument and debate like this, you can't just say your is fact while the other are not
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty sure he didn't meant that way.In an argument and debate like this, you can't just say your is fact while the other are not
It is.Didn't notice that this thread has 8 pages and anyways are the calcs for the lower tiers are good?
Basically, Jasonsith looked over it and I made changes according to how he requested me to. It should be fine now, though it would be best if he looked over it again.So it's done evaluating? and the higher tiers are the only problem now?
Everything was done untill Quasi started to dismantle the cosmology.So it's done evaluating? and the higher tiers are the only problem now?
A god damn Benedict Arnold.@QuasiYuri Looks like you're hated not only in Shinza lel, no offense
True.Yea we shouldn't derail
The calcs that's been fixed and the High 1-B cosmologySo what currently needs to be evaluated here?
I mean he was just giving input like we askedEverything was done until someone decided to dismantle the cosmology.
It was mildly infuriating.I mean he was just giving input like we asked
I understand that notion and I am currently at the peak of my stress levels after completely abstaining from "questionable ethics" weeks prior.I mean you shouldn't let your stress taking on you, i also experienced this way a years ago and its not a fricking good experience
He's perfectly within his rights to respond so long as a thread is ongoing.It would be alright if the discussion was still ongoing but he squeezed the input at the last possible moment.
I acknowledge that right even though it's mildly infuriatingHe's perfectly within his rights to respond so long as a thread is ongoing.
iirc, that blog is for real life Buddhism's cosmology, not the one for this novelI think there was a blog posted earlier in this thread by @ActuallySpaceMan but I'm not sure.
@SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @Sir_Ovens @QuasiYuri @ZaratthustraCurrently, the lower tiering placements have calculations that seem to have been evaluated and most of the abilities have been checked and accepted. I'd still recommend that staff check the abilities and whether they're valid since some stuff may have been missed.
What's left is evaluation of the higher tiers, which are dependent on what's accepted as the cosmology. Currently, the argument from the proponents is that since any grain of sand contains the Three Realms and Pure Lands, which are collectively countless worlds (which would be universes in context) and those space-time continuum's would have their own grains of sand, this would lead to an endless recursive hierarchy of universes, which is High 1-B.
@ActuallySpaceMan can supply the scans and argue for his case if need be.
QuasiYuri thinks that the provided scans aren't enough for the hierarchy and that it's reached through interpretation that isn't supported (from what I understand, feel free to correct me).
I think that's it. Hopefully, this thread can be concluded, I'm spent.
Going by a similar question Ultima answered, its at most an Aleph-1 (an uncountable infinite set) number of universes; which would qualify for a Low 1-C rating. In order for it to be High 1-B you would need to show dimensional axis transcendence or reality-fiction interaction. Neither of which have been provided.Would any of you be willing to help us out with evaluating this please?
Good God.Low 1-C Wukong you say?
Yeah, this should be workI think 2-A, possibly Low 1-C is good
Agreed.Yeah, this should be work
I mean if this is the only option left, I'll accept it.Damn so you'd only agree if there was a tier 1 in his key
Damn so you'd only agree if there was a tier 1 in his key
tier 1 is something everyone want, even if it is just Low 1-C
I want tier 1 too but it's hard to find matches in it