• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(JTTW) Sun Wukong CRT

Status
Not open for further replies.
So it's done evaluating? and the higher tiers are the only problem now?
Basically, Jasonsith looked over it and I made changes according to how he requested me to. It should be fine now, though it would be best if he looked over it again.
Right now the High Tiers are the issue.
 
So what currently needs to be evaluated here?
 
It would be alright if the discussion was still ongoing but he squeezed the input at the last possible moment.
 
I mean you shouldn't let your stress taking on you, i also experienced this way a years ago and its not a fricking good experience
 
I mean you shouldn't let your stress taking on you, i also experienced this way a years ago and its not a fricking good experience
I understand that notion and I am currently at the peak of my stress levels after completely abstaining from "questionable ethics" weeks prior.
 
Planck, would you be willing to write a sufficiently thorough explanation for what our staff currently need to evaluate here please?
 
Currently, the lower tiering placements have calculations that seem to have been evaluated and most of the abilities have been checked and accepted. I'd still recommend that staff check the abilities and whether they're valid since some stuff may have been missed.

What's left is evaluation of the higher tiers, which are dependent on what's accepted as the cosmology. Currently, the argument from the proponents is that since any grain of sand contains the Three Realms and Pure Lands, which are collectively countless worlds (which would be universes in context) and those space-time continuum's would have their own grains of sand, this would lead to an endless recursive hierarchy of universes, which is High 1-B.

@ActuallySpaceMan can supply the scans and argue for his case if need be.

QuasiYuri thinks that the provided scans aren't enough for the hierarchy and that it's reached through interpretation that isn't supported (from what I understand, feel free to correct me).

I think that's it. Hopefully, this thread can be concluded, I'm spent.
 
Thank you for helping out. I hope so too.

Are there any blogs with evidence that they should take a look at as well?
 
Okay. Understood. I will ask then.
 
Currently, the lower tiering placements have calculations that seem to have been evaluated and most of the abilities have been checked and accepted. I'd still recommend that staff check the abilities and whether they're valid since some stuff may have been missed.

What's left is evaluation of the higher tiers, which are dependent on what's accepted as the cosmology. Currently, the argument from the proponents is that since any grain of sand contains the Three Realms and Pure Lands, which are collectively countless worlds (which would be universes in context) and those space-time continuum's would have their own grains of sand, this would lead to an endless recursive hierarchy of universes, which is High 1-B.

@ActuallySpaceMan can supply the scans and argue for his case if need be.

QuasiYuri thinks that the provided scans aren't enough for the hierarchy and that it's reached through interpretation that isn't supported (from what I understand, feel free to correct me).

I think that's it. Hopefully, this thread can be concluded, I'm spent.
@SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @Sir_Ovens @QuasiYuri @Zaratthustra

Would any of you be willing to help us out with evaluating this please?
 
Would any of you be willing to help us out with evaluating this please?
Going by a similar question Ultima answered, its at most an Aleph-1 (an uncountable infinite set) number of universes; which would qualify for a Low 1-C rating. In order for it to be High 1-B you would need to show dimensional axis transcendence or reality-fiction interaction. Neither of which have been provided.
  • Aleph-0 of planets = High 3-A
  • Aleph-0 universes = 2-A
  • Aleph-0 dimensions = High 1-B
So either 2-A or Low 1-C. Being generous it would be the latter.
 
Last edited:
Low 1-C Wukong you say?
FLIaWdJVQAE9-UJ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top