- 1,900
- 2,241
- Thread starter
- #41
We wait for Qawsed to respondSo, what now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We wait for Qawsed to respondSo, what now?
Would it really scale up linearly, purely based on the count of nucleons, like that? That's unintuitive to me.The paper lists Gravitational Binding Energy values per nucleon under Eg/A.
The 202.78 MeV value I used was for the value of the CIDDM Neutron Star I was previously using
It doesn't scale up linearly, there's a specific value listed for each Neutron Star in the tableWould it really scale up linearly, purely based on the count of nucleons, like that? That's unintuitive to me.
So is that Tier 4A results? If I looking at our own attack potency chart correctly, that is something interesting.[Googles Mass-Energy of the Sun]
[Multiplies 1.7877139260254E+47 J by 0.57]
[Is about 10^47 Joules]
.
.
.
Huh. Well would you look at that.
In my defense, this was what @Qawsedf234 said.
[202.78 Mega-Electronvolts or 202.78 million electronvolts * 10^57 divided by 6.242*10^18 electron volts per Joule]
[It's 3.24863826×10^46 Joules]
[Since the number of neutrons in a neutron star was an order of magnitude estimate, not an exact number, that's close enough]
Yeah that checks out.
Looks like a decent choice.The 202.78 MeV value I used was for the value of the CIDDM Neutron Star I was previously using
4-A starts at 10^57 Joules, not 10^47So is that Tier 4A results? If I looking at our own attack potency chart correctly, that is something interesting.
Attack Potency
Destructive Capacity is the term used to determine the amount of damage a character can produce. It is normally the deciding factor of VS matches along with Speed. It is measured in units of energy. An alternative term for Destructive Capacity which has more direct meaning: The Destructive...vsbattles.fandom.com
Looks good but, upgrading the energy requirement for Universe level based on a hypothetical maximum mass object changes a couple more things than downgrading it would.Looks like a decent choice.
So, 939 MeV = 1.5044e-10J
1.5044e-10J = m*c^2 = m*299792458^2 => m = 1.673871e-27kg.
CIDDM M_b is 2.64 M☉ = 5.2507e+30kg
A = M_b / m_b = 5.2507e+30kg / 1.673871e-27kg = 3.136860606343021654595844004705261038634e57
CIDDM E_t/A is 202.78 MeV.
202.78 * 3.136860606343021654595844004705261038634e57 = 6.3609259375423793e59 MeV = 1.019133e+47J
Does that sound correct?
I don’t think there will been any major changes to the attack potency charts, but just minor things as it should account for everything we got regarding cosmic feats and stuff.4-A starts at 10^57 Joules, not 10^47
Also, upgrading the energy requirement for Universe level based on a hypothetical maximum mass object changes a couple more things than downgrading it would, so if I did just totally confuse the energy unit then this whole thing can be ignored and we can pretend like this never happened.
Ah, I assuming you are calculating the amount of energy for a neutron star it keeps generating?Looks like a decent choice.
So, 939 MeV = 1.5044e-10J
1.5044e-10J = m*c^2 = m*299792458^2 => m = 1.673871e-27kg.
CIDDM M_b is 2.64 M☉ = 5.2507e+30kg
A = M_b / m_b = 5.2507e+30kg / 1.673871e-27kg = 3.136860606343021654595844004705261038634e57
CIDDM E_t/A is 202.78 MeV.
202.78 * 3.136860606343021654595844004705261038634e57 = 6.3609259375423793e59 MeV = 1.019133e+47J
Does that sound correct?
It's somewhere around 10^47 Joules, but this is the GBE for a hypothetical maximum mass Neutron Star according to some model, rather than a physical object that exists like PSR J0348+0432. As such it makes more sense to use that for calculating the Baseline for Universe level rather than what I brought up, meaning the current boundary should stay.So what's the final value?
No, what's being calc'd is the GBE of a maximum mass Neutron Star, based on the mass energy of the Sun value, and the MeV per Nucleon Value.Ah, I assuming you are calculating the amount of energy for a neutron star it keeps generating?
If I am understanding the calculation made by DonTalk, he is calculating the energy of a neutron star.
Oh, nm, then I didn’t specifically say GBE.It's somewhere around 10^57 Joules, but this is the GBE for a hypothetical maximum mass Neutron Star according to some model, rather than a physical object that exists like PSR J0348+0432. As such it makes more sense to use that for calculating the Baseline for Universe level rather than what I brought up, meaning the current boundary should stay.
No, that's the GBE of the Neutron Star, based on the mass energy of the Sun value, and the MeV per Nucleon Value.
Honestly, main problem is that we don't know the radius of CIDMM. Since the new and old values are only off by a factor of less than 2, it being larger could easily make the end result not higher.It's somewhere around 10^57 Joules, but this is the GBE for a hypothetical maximum mass Neutron Star according to some model, rather than a physical object that exists like PSR J0348+0432. As such it makes more sense to use that for calculating the Baseline for Universe level rather than what I brought up, meaning the current boundary should stay.
There is a calculation for this one.It's somewhere around 10^57 Joules, but this is the GBE for a hypothetical maximum mass Neutron Star according to some model, rather than a physical object that exists like PSR J0348+0432. As such it makes more sense to use that for calculating the Baseline for Universe level rather than what I brought up, meaning the current boundary should stay.
Yeah, i had just misunderstood the paper and made an incorrect judgment based off that.approximation
dafuq, that much for a singuar structure in the universe, no wonder it looked off from hereIt's somewhere around 10^57 Joules, but this is the GBE for a hypothetical maximum mass Neutron Star according to some model, rather than a physical object that exists like PSR J0348+0432. As such it makes more sense to use that for calculating the Baseline for Universe level rather than what I brought up, meaning the current boundary should stay.
That was I typo, I meant 10^47 joules- still we should just keep the current boundary.dafuq, that much for a singuar structure in the universe, no wonder it looked off from here
It happens to the best of us, don't worry!Yeah, i had just misunderstood the paper and made an incorrect judgment based off that.
So apologies there for my mistake.
Basically the GBE for a Neutron star is around 4B.So what should we currently do here exactly?
I am fine with it myself since the OP’s proposal was a result of misunderstanding in specific calculations methodsIs closing this thread fine with the rest of you as well, or is there something left to do here?
Should be ok.Is closing this thread fine with the rest of you as well, or is there something left to do here?