Is this not enough for total universal destruction? (yes, a DBS question)

[ZoroNotZolo]

After hearing your justifications, I also think it's a Low 2-C feat.

 

[My_area]

But it wouldn't scale to canon, and since only DBS has universal feats then it won't scale, though you can probably argue that buuhan's chain reaction feat is actually 2-C.
Because the 7 years he lived (or deaded) in the after life are counted to the amount of years he aged, because your body can't get stronger without aging, so if they eat something in the other world for example then their body wouldn't grow from it since they already live forever and don't deteriorate.

Um what are you talking about? I am not even talking about any of the feats but rather how Afterlife works in fillers is similar to how it works in manga.
Why would it count as him aging if dead people dont age..because well duh they are dead. Having a body doesn't change the fact that they are still dead. What.....What does training to get stronger even have to do with aging? Time spent on training still applies regardless of whether body ages or not. Goku got stronger because he trained for 7 years without his body growing 7 years.

 

[My_area]

Look..what I found while I was just reading through the manga...that was unexpected..
An actual statement of this which kills the whole "do dead people with body age in Afterlife" :/
Context
Statement

 

[Sus]

so what's the conclusion? 3A or low 2C

 

[FluffyCreatureZ]

so what's the conclusion? 3A or low 2C

Low 2-C, they make a thread

 

[ZillertheBucko]

the crt got nuked by mods for no reason
this site is bullshit bro

 

[My_area]

It was getting messy with all the mix of arguments..pretty sure queries were answered already by AKM Sama so its fine

 

[ZillertheBucko]

It was getting messy with all the mix of arguments..pretty sure queries were answered already by AKM Sama so its fine

well it's kinda dumb that the thread didn't go through regardless
solid logic was apparent and some people just decided to disagree long enough to make it look like there was a stalemate
but there's not really anything at all you can do when the mod disagrees, can you

 

[Nullflowerblush]

Really, the only thing stopping this feat from being Low 2-C is the Wiki's standards. But hey, that's just how the cookie crumbles.

 

[My_area]

well it's kinda dumb that the thread didn't go through regardless
solid logic was apparent and some people just decided to disagree long enough to make it look like there was a stalemate
but there's not really anything at all you can do when the mod disagrees, can you

Eh I am not sure, their argument for upgrade was based on something which is not what the standards in this wiki works like, better choice would be to change the standards before making another Low 2-C CRT again.

 

[ZillertheBucko]

Really, the only thing stopping this feat from being Low 2-C is the Wiki's standards. But hey, that's just how the cookie crumbles.

well the cookie kinda sucks it seems
when solid logic is wrong because "wiki standards" there is a serious problem

 

[ZillertheBucko]

It's kinda hypocritical since I use the wiki regularly, but still there are a lot of issues with how people do things here
I mean I kinda got into powerscaling from watching seththeprogrammer vids, so this dragon ball thing in particular is more frustrating to me and you can probably tell why

 

[My_area]

Hmm I suppose so.

 

[ZillertheBucko]

anyways there's nothing stopping people from making a new crt
but maybe we should go for the high 3-A since we know for a fact that it's not gonna "go against the standards" and also the argument is easier to make

 

[My_area]

Its gonna keep getting closed, if they still persist they are going to get warned or reported to RVR, either way they are not gonna get Low 2-C so its a wasted effort.

Sure, you guys can do that. As for this thread guess this can be closed now? Since it was resolved on other thread and all on going debate here are over now.

 

[ZillertheBucko]

Its gonna keep getting closed, if they still persist they are going to get warned or reported to RVR, either way they are not gonna gst Low 2-C so its a wasted effort.

Sure, you guys can do that. As for this thread guess this can be closed now? Since it was resolved on other thread and all on going debate are over now.

well it's not exactly over
I'm gonna find some kind of way within the rules to win this debate
but at the very least anything lower than high 3-A is just embarassingly wrong and I don't feel like letting it stay that way

 

[My_area]

well it's not exactly over
I'm gonna find some kind of way within the rules to win this debate
but at the very least anything lower than high 3-A is just embarassingly wrong and I don't feel like letting it stay that way

Good luck with that, given the standards, it is very difficult to upgrade BOG beyond 3-A.
Up to you, but I am satisfied with 3-A BOG, we dont even get that in other places.

 

[ZillertheBucko]

Good luck with that, given the standards, it is very difficult to upgrade BOG beyond 3-A.
Up to you, but I am satisfied with 3-A BOG, we dont even get that in other places.

wait seriously
people actually believe 3-B ssg?

 

[My_area]

wait seriously
people actually believe 3-B ssg?

Oh god..its get even worse then that..

 

[1st_Virtue_of_Pure_Void]

Oh god..its get even worse then that..

wait seriously
people actually believe 3-B ssg?

how is that a thing?

 

[AKM sama]

Well, given that the CRT was closed and this thread's question was already answered by Everything12 earlier, I'm going to close it.