Is this enough evidence for Low-Godly Regen for Edo Tensei?

[Shadowbokunohero]

Madara's entire body wasn't hit is what he means.

doesnt need to be.

 

[Rin_The_Dragon_Empress]

MX3 that's blatantly dishonest and you're ignoring how High Regenerationn is defined in order to push your own ideal ratings for his regen. I agree with High but not for the meteorite statement.

High: The ability to regenerate from scattered or lone molecules, atoms, or particles. so yes, you need sufficient proof Madara was reduced to a singular atom or molecule otherwise you should drop that argument.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

@Dragonmasterxyz

I've already stated At least Mid-High, possibly Low-Godly is the best solution of we don't get a solid conclusion.

 

[Omimi]

he said hit him harder after onoki used jinton
+onokis other jutsu is useless against him


and this implies he was talking about jinton ---------------->

^madara statement suggested that he has High

why so nitpicking

if we all start to nitpicking then i am sure wiki can downgrade all high to what ever wiki want. no?

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

So is it Mid-High or High?

 

[Sigurd_Snake_in_The_Eye]

Madara's entire body wasn't hit is what he means.

doesnt need to be.

Yes you do...if the rest of his body is there then he didn't regenerate from a single molecule lol.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

doesnt need to be.

Lol, yes it does.

 

[Shadowbokunohero]

Is that so?

 

[Rin_The_Dragon_Empress]

Also the entire body needs to be hit, regenerating a limb that's been destroyed on an atomic level isn't High. I remember seeing a Saint Seiya thread about this awhile ago, Seiya regens a limb that's been destroyed on a sub atomic level and his regen is only low mid. The arm is still there, so it's still low mid.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

So is it Mid-High or High?

It's high if you take the likely interpretation that Madara was referring to Jiton

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

So is it Mid-High or High?

Mid-High, personally I would suggest something with "possibly/likely higher" instead of "possibly low godly" so people don't get confused.

 

[Omimi]

So is it Mid-High or High?

Mid-High is solid conclusion unlike high so

Mid-High, possibly Low-Godly

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

>Asks for the regen

>Gets 3 different answers

 

[LordGriffin1000]

I do not see the need to prove something involving molecules or atoms, the classification of Regenerationn does not ask for it, it just says that the body needs to be completely destroyed.

Just stop already please, that's not Low-Godly Regenerationn. Untill you prove that they were reduced to literally nothing it doesn't count.

 

[Shadowbokunohero]

@Dragon Looks to be Mid High physically then with low godly statements

so Mid High possibly Low godly?

 

[LordGriffin1000]

I agree with At least Mid-High, possibly Low-Godly

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

I mean....is this contradicted in anyway? If not, I see no issue with "Mid-High, possibly Low-Godly".

 

[Shadowbokunohero]

Mid godly?

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

Mid godly?

RIP me....Low-Godly...I edited my comment.

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

I mean....is this contradicted in anyway? If not, I see no issue with "Mid-High, possibly Mid-Godly".

W0t?

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Personally I would suggest something with "possibly/likely higher" instead of "possibly low godly" so people don't get confused.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

I mean...we have files with "possibly [insert regen here]" on other profiles. So I see no issue here.

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Well, if that's the case then I could agree with that.

I still find it wonky that it doesn't have proof of being High but it has statements of being Low-Godly

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

I mean, you don't need proof of a lower regen to reach a higher regen.

 

[Wrath_Of_Itachi]

I can understand wanting more evidence for a powerful upgrade, but why don't we apply this to all profiles? We have many profiles with EE off of a statement of turning things to nothingness without actual feats to support it. We also have AP and speed statements with no actual feats backing it up. I'm just curious why this is any different.

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Well, that's true. Touche

Anyways, I agree with the proposed change.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

Back up everyone....so...didn't this regen not activate from TSB?

 

[Wrath_Of_Itachi]

Elaborate please.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

I can understand wanting more evidence for a powerful upgrade, but why don't we apply this to all profiles? We have many profiles with EE off of a statement of turning things to nothingness without actual feats to support it. We also have AP and speed statements with no actual feats backing it up. I'm just curious why this is any different.

Some profiles actually need some legitimate overhauls. When explaining high abilites like these, but it's best to not start up that discussion here.

Plus some verses are so unknown they get away with stuff like that.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

For Minato.

Didn't he never regenerate his arm?

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Back up everyone....so...didn't this regen not activate from TSB?

lol

It is because the TSB can negate ninjutsu and since the edos are just walking jutsus they get negated.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

Ah. Okay then

 

[Wrath_Of_Itachi]

Some profiles actually need some legitimate overhauls. When explaining high abilites like these, but it's best to not start up that discussion here.

Plus some verses are so unknown they get away with stuff like that.

That just seems dishonest.

 

[Wrath_Of_Itachi]

For Minato.

Didn't he never regenerate his arm?

On here the TSB is treated as power null.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

@Dragonmaster

What Tony di bugalu said is correct.

 

[Wrath_Of_Itachi]

And the edo is a jutsu so it stops the Regenerationn of the edo. I Always thought the TSB should have regen negation as well with some other stuff. But it was just said to be power null.

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Ah. Okay the

Of course it doesn't mean that Naruto anc Co. are capable of negating Low-Godly. It only works in verse.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

@Wrath

It's likely due to those verses being under everyone's radar.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

@Wrath Of Itachi

Message me on my wall so I can explain it better. Don't want to continue taking up your thread.

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

@Dragonmaster
What Tony di bugalu said is correct.

Just call me Tony plz :´v