• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Is there anything else wrong with using original works that acknowledge battleboarding/VSBW terminology or are from users of VSBW?

4,893
2,461
^^^, I do know that there's bound to be that one guy that's willing to make the most powerful character like he's trying to make the highest number. But is there anything else I'm not seeing?
 
^^^, I do know that there's bound to be that one guy that's willing to make the most powerful character like he's trying to make the highest number. But is there anything else I'm not seeing?
It's basically SCP or Suggsverse, making a verse strong for the sake of it and to gloat/flex.

It's just a very bad practice and frowned upon basically everywhere and in our case we don't allow stuff like that.
 
It's basically SCP or Suggsverse, making a verse strong for the sake of it and to gloat/flex.

It's just a very bad practice and frowned upon basically everywhere and in our case we don't allow stuff like that.
I mean there's a lot of emotion here since the writers of the flexing care about making the highest "infinity" or "number" in a sense more than the writing of the story. If you get what I mean.

The old and ironic thing here is like numbers, you can always make a bigger one, even if paradoxical. Infinity paradoxes have dealt with that front. But eh, that's all I have to say for now here.
 
The problem is getting the verse to go beyond just "big number", and doubly so to get a modicum of interest for it.
 
Back
Top