• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Is surviving your history being erased and thus creating a time paradox acausality type 5.

Jibz

He/Him
3,111
2,505
If not, whats the reasoning behind Downstreamers having acausality type 5? Is it due to transcending maths itself or something else?
 
Adding onto this, does surviving an event that erases every iteration of yourself from every timeline grant any type of acausality or is it just resistance to EE?
 
1. Nah that sounds like A1. Also can you elaborate more on what exactly you mean by paradox?

2. Pretty sure it's because they transcends the system or some shit.

3. If it was meant to erase this character too - alongside his variation - then seems like EE resistance. But it could depend entirely on the context
 
1. Nah that sounds like A1. Also can you elaborate more on what exactly you mean by paradox?

2. Pretty sure it's because they transcends the system or some shit.

3. If it was meant to erase this character too - alongside his variation - then seems like EE resistance. But it could depend entirely on the context
1. They described it as a time paradox as they erased their grandparents yet still exist
2. Elaborate pls
 
1. Acausality type 1 then
2. Haven't read it myself, just going off by what others mentioned a while ago
Is there a link to the thread people were talking about this, perhaps i can more eloquently be able to explain it with the added context
 
Back
Top