• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
So 8 did check the old calc of the city before we even used the Iron Man scans and it's smaller than what it is currently accepted.

So we have more or two issues here: Iron Man movie visors are larger than, but still mostly close to, the measurements of scaling the city to the buildings and the Wakanda files which triple the length and height of the area.

Overall if we're ignoring Iron Man's visor for being wrong, why are we accepting the cities measurements that are based entirely on his visor? And why are we taking it as fact when it also makes things entirely to long like with the spire.
 
The Cull staggering scene
main-qimg-57a36fcc245c6b538016489e89f2062a
 
So 8 did check the old calc of the city before we even used the Iron Man scans and it's smaller than what it is currently accepted.

So we have more or two issues here: Iron Man movie visors are larger than, but still mostly close to, the measurements of scaling the city to the buildings and the Wakanda files which triple the length and height of the area.

Overall if we're ignoring Iron Man's visor for being wrong, why are we accepting the cities measurements that are based entirely on his visor? And why are we taking it as fact when it also makes things entirely to long like with the spire.
I'm guessing the buildings are likely too inconsistent to use here and actual sources would take precedence over pixel-scaling of a building that might not even exist in the next shot of the movie in the right place or in the right shape.

Also the Guidebook states the measurements to be done according to the United States Geological Survey, so while the values are taken from Iron Man's visor, the guidebook prolly took more steps to iron out the kinks and give it an official value and use actual agencies in-verse to legitimize the size values.

That and there's the ice age thing. The Chicxulub meteor is larger by 4 km. Good thing they mentioned that in the guidebook.
 
Last edited:
Also, the trailer is cut in a way to make you think Gorr is shattering the planet

Given that there's a burst of lightning, it's evidently Thor performing the feat
 
We have no reason to not use High 6-C if the calc is legit. Every other lower feats we have is done either casually (Thor smashing that ice mountain) or just a lowball (Thanos' snap)....

Mark 45 Iron Man also becomes Low 7-C. This wouldn't be problematic as no one scales to Mark 45 Iron Man
I agree with all of this. Thor is almost definitely going to be far stronger than before in Love & Thunder, and we shouldn't delay this based on speculation anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top