- 6,900
- 8,043
evaluatedI put it in this blog
Thor Shatters Jotunheim
vsbattles.fandom.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
evaluatedI put it in this blog
Thor Shatters Jotunheim
vsbattles.fandom.com
Garbage. That's what it is.Oh my god what the **** is this show
Hey, that's not fair.Garbage. That's what it is.
OOFHey, that's not fair.
Garbage can be recycled
Didn't Korg somewhat hurt Cull Obsidian with a swing in Endgame?Korg saves the day and lands the finishing blow on Gorr!
No it can’t, that is why it is called garbage.Hey, that's not fair.
Garbage can be recycled
We don't really see much other than him staggering Cull with his staff cannon while Drax was stabbing him from behindDidn't Korg somewhat hurt Cull Obsidian with a swing in Endgame?
Still staggered a 6-C though...We don't really see much other than him staggering Cull with his staff cannon while Drax was stabbing him from behind
Are you sure that garbage can't be recycled?No it can’t, that is why it is called garbage.
Recycling Centers existThere is a reason why there is a distinction between garbage and recycling cans.
Staggering doesn't count for much unless Cull was actually harmedStill staggered a 6-C though...
Spider-Man staggered Thanos and yet he isn't 6-CStill staggered a 6-C though...
Should be in this video
A Question requires an answerWhy the heck did you bring that here?
I'm guessing the buildings are likely too inconsistent to use here and actual sources would take precedence over pixel-scaling of a building that might not even exist in the next shot of the movie in the right place or in the right shape.So 8 did check the old calc of the city before we even used the Iron Man scans and it's smaller than what it is currently accepted.
So we have more or two issues here: Iron Man movie visors are larger than, but still mostly close to, the measurements of scaling the city to the buildings and the Wakanda files which triple the length and height of the area.
Overall if we're ignoring Iron Man's visor for being wrong, why are we accepting the cities measurements that are based entirely on his visor? And why are we taking it as fact when it also makes things entirely to long like with the spire.
Jotunheim now exists.I guess then.
Its going to be weird as a rating though since like, nothing else is even close to it that's legitmate.
Seems like it's on track.so are the high 6-C going to be accepted or nah?
To be fair, nothing was close to the 6-C value either until nowI guess then.
Its going to be weird as a rating though since like, nothing else is even close to it that's legitmate.
There were storm calcs that were vaguely close (but didn't physically scale to anyone). But yeah ultimately you're right.To be fair, nothing was close to the 6-C value either until now
6-A+ lowballedWell then. Here's to Gorr the God Butcher making the heralds even more broken.
Hell nahPlease don't jinx the gorr feat before they somehow manage to make it a specific condition in the movie or come out with some weird statement that prevents us from using it for scaling.
I agree with all of this. Thor is almost definitely going to be far stronger than before in Love & Thunder, and we shouldn't delay this based on speculation anyway.We have no reason to not use High 6-C if the calc is legit. Every other lower feats we have is done either casually (Thor smashing that ice mountain) or just a lowball (Thanos' snap)....
Mark 45 Iron Man also becomes Low 7-C. This wouldn't be problematic as no one scales to Mark 45 Iron Man
Me before elaborating on itI think Love and Thunder discussion shouldn't be here since there's probably gonna be a new scaling chain
I still remember this clip