-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Hero of Lore revision
- Thread starter DnW0
- Start date
- 6,674
- 2,488
The Composite Hero of lore needs work.
- 4,256
- 658
- 4,256
- 658
Yes I know the composite hero needs work, I am doing it right now.
- 4,256
- 658
Yes I agree, I feel that needs to be done with entirely.
What is the alternative, then? There is a clear power crawl, so how do we seperate the feats?
What is the alternative, then? There is a clear power crawl, so how do we seperate the feats?
- 6,674
- 2,488
Yeah there's also the fact that AQW has a 4-A feat. There's also other games besides AQ, AQW, DF, and MQ, like Oversoul, Warpforce and Epic duel.
- 4,256
- 658
how does that help us?
- 4,256
- 658
I fail to see how AQW Hero of Lore and Dragon Fable Hero of Lore are going to be any different. This is why I wanted to just make composite Hero of Lore.
- 4,256
- 658
Well I have already made a new profile. Scrap the old one and work off the new one
- 4,256
- 658
You can add the revisions you proposed to it, since it is a composite.
- 4,256
- 658
I am planning on adding renders of the base player from Adventure Quest and Dragon Fable as well.
- 819
- 85
- Thread starter
- #95
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Hero_of_Lore_(Composite)#World Destroyer to this one?ProfessorLord said:
- 4,256
- 658
Yes.
How about instead of Early-Game we refer to it based on the chapters? Maybe just:
Beginning / Medium / End
or something like that?
How about instead of Early-Game we refer to it based on the chapters? Maybe just:
Beginning / Medium / End
or something like that?
- 4,256
- 658
Beginning-Story / Middle-Story / End-Story?
- 6,674
- 2,488
Only MQ's story line has ended.
- 4,256
- 658
I think it just denotes whatever has currently been established. It's the end for now.
- 4,256
- 658
I also think it's fine to scale the feats, attack potency and fights we see from that order, but to note that the special classes which grant various manipulations can be accessed at any time throughout said story.
Basically, we leave the abilities as open to all parts since they can be accessed in all parts.
Basically, we leave the abilities as open to all parts since they can be accessed in all parts.
- 6,674
- 2,488
Probably should include it.
- 4,256
- 658
As for seperating feats by story progression while having a composite character...
I say just group all the early game stories together. AQW and Dragon Fable all seem to have linear story progression, so they have quantifiable moments in the story in which you can call something "Early-Game" or "Late-Game".
For Adventure Quest, you litterally cannot access some of the story until you are a certain level. I suggest we decide on which levels are considered beginning, middle and late game. Then we proceed to scale feats accordingly.
Any other suggestions tough?
I say just group all the early game stories together. AQW and Dragon Fable all seem to have linear story progression, so they have quantifiable moments in the story in which you can call something "Early-Game" or "Late-Game".
For Adventure Quest, you litterally cannot access some of the story until you are a certain level. I suggest we decide on which levels are considered beginning, middle and late game. Then we proceed to scale feats accordingly.
Any other suggestions tough?
- 4,256
- 658
Logically, since there are 150 levels in Adventure Quest, this would mean:
Levels 1-49 are considered "early game"
Levels 50-99 are considered "mid game"
Levels 100-150 are considered "late game"
Levels 1-49 are considered "early game"
Levels 50-99 are considered "mid game"
Levels 100-150 are considered "late game"
- 819
- 85
- Thread starter
- #106
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Hero_of_Lore_(Composite)
I added the stuff in the powers and abilities and the early-mid-late game keys.
there wasn't any point in adding the fire-water-electricity-earth manipulation stuff because there was already elemental manipulation on the profile
not sure what to do for AP, Speed, Durability stuff
I added the stuff in the powers and abilities and the early-mid-late game keys.
there wasn't any point in adding the fire-water-electricity-earth manipulation stuff because there was already elemental manipulation on the profile
not sure what to do for AP, Speed, Durability stuff
- 4,256
- 658
Hmm...
I would say add another key including various armors and other equipment, then perhaps list them all off in the equipment section.
That we we can have another key unrelated to the story progression involving any potential equipment.
I would say add another key including various armors and other equipment, then perhaps list them all off in the equipment section.
That we we can have another key unrelated to the story progression involving any potential equipment.
- 4,256
- 658
Can we see the source?
- 4,256
- 658
So here is what I believe:
If the item descriptions truly are non-canon (which they seem to be, since they are not destroying the planet with their star-level punches) then we ignore all descriptions and only truly add what we can observe from ther equipment.
This would allow us to leave all the tabs as is as well as keep the powers and manipulation associated with the abilities, but ignore the fallacious ap and durability associated.
If the item descriptions truly are non-canon (which they seem to be, since they are not destroying the planet with their star-level punches) then we ignore all descriptions and only truly add what we can observe from ther equipment.
This would allow us to leave all the tabs as is as well as keep the powers and manipulation associated with the abilities, but ignore the fallacious ap and durability associated.
- 4,256
- 658
Does that make any sense?
- 6,674
- 2,488
Just because they don't destroy the planet doesn't make it non canon.
- 4,256
- 658
No, but it removes credibility from the description. How can you have the energy of a star compressed into a point... but still do the same amount of damage to a Frogzard, regardless of whether or not you had it?
- 6,674
- 2,488
Game mechanics
- 4,256
- 658
I don't think that argument works in this case. Game mechanics would imply they are one-hit kill attacks, not that they do equal damage to normal punches.
- 4,256
- 658
Yes, it wouldn't make sense to include them since they are based on item descriptions and not what we have seen.
It does make sense to keep the various manipulations because we have literally seen the item function in that regard.
It does make sense to keep the various manipulations because we have literally seen the item function in that regard.
Similar threads
- Locked
