- 10,394
- 3,348
Antorus, stop screaming all your words with pointless all-caps and exclamation points. It doesn't serve your argument in any way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is utterly irrelevant because Goku's never actually fought an Omnipresent opponent.AntorusTheBurningThrone said:Guess who was ALSO Omnipresent...The Causality said:>Speed isn't equalized
>This girs is Omnipresent through time
Okay it's really a stomp....
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Fusion_Zamasu#Infinite Zamasu
THIS GUY! And guess who's basically surpassed him...
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Son_Goku_(Dragon_Ball_Super)
THIS GUY!
Except, the Kai's, Beerus, and Whis could feel his Power. And with Jiren, even the Angels were amazed by him, Supreme Kai's never felt his Power before, and Son Goku/Vegeta have confirmed that Jiren's Ki is something they've never delt with before. And yes, Goku and Vegeta can sense God Ki, and they did try to face off against IZ. However, they were weakened, but I don't think it would've made a difference either way.The Everlasting said:Which is utterly irrelevant because Goku's never actually fought an Omnipresent opponent.AntorusTheBurningThrone said:Guess who was ALSO Omnipresent...The Causality said:>Speed isn't equalized
>This girs is Omnipresent through time
Okay it's really a stomp....
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Fusion_Zamasu#Infinite Zamasu
THIS GUY! And guess who's basically surpassed him...
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Son_Goku_(Dragon_Ball_Super)
THIS GUY!
Oh...The Everlasting said:I'm saying it's obnoxious when you KEEP WRITING LIKE THIS for no reason.
...I literally said that. I literally said that he attacked Son Goku FAST during both his SSBKKx20 Fight, as well as his last fight against M.U.I Son Goku. The Spirit Bomb shit was a glare. His shit against SSBKKx20 Son Goku and U.I Son Goku wasn't.The real cal howard said:Yeah, no. I saw the UI Goku fight. The first video you showed me had very obvious red strikes to show that's those were physical attacks, not advanced kiais, like pretty much every other time he glared.
Zeno destroyed the Future. Yet, we still saw Trunks and Mai in the Present.The Everlasting said:And none of that has to do with what I said.
Goku has never fought someone with Omnipresence.
Besides, destroying all of the present would... you know... kill Goku, because he can't actually live without it.
With that logic, the Present becomes the Future for Trunks and Mai. Trunks and Mai can't just magically exist in only the Present (Even though, they clearly can).The Everlasting said:The future becomes the present for Goku when he gets there. Goku can't just magically exist only in the future.
Except it's been confirmed multiple times that no one can beat the Omni King. No matter how Powerful they are. No matter the Immortality, either.The real cal howard said:Alongside that, no one sans Zeno would be above a fully realized Infinite Zamasu anyway.
Time Machine's, pal.The Causality said:
You being in another timeline =/= You being able to exist in a universe without a present.AntorusTheBurningThrone said:With that logic, the Present becomes the Future for Trunks and Mai. Trunks and Mai can't just magically exist in only the Present (Even though, they clearly can).
Then that would mean Trunks went back to the Past. Yet, he was capable of existing there fully.The Everlasting said:That's not even remotely how it works.
The present is what is happening "right now", hence Future Trunks' timeline is technically his own present, it was only the future from the perspective of everyone else.
Goku can only exist in the present. He can't only exist in the past or future.
Except, Trunks was capable of existing in another Timeline, in the Past, without any consequences. Meanwhile, Trunk's "present" was destroyed by Zeno. And yet when Trunks went back to his Timeline with Son Goku to grab Future Zeno, nothing happened. He can still live in his Present, even when it's all destroyed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_T1rhRxqtsDMB 1 said:You being in another timeline =/= You being able to exist in a universe without a present.AntorusTheBurningThrone said:With that logic, the Present becomes the Future for Trunks and Mai. Trunks and Mai can't just magically exist in only the Present (Even though, they clearly can).
"Trunks existed in the Present" Yet he was able to exist in his own Past. To him, that's not a Present. Therefore, he shouldnt've existed, yes? ...The Everlasting said:Trunks existed in the present. That's entirely how it works.
To people in 1000 B.C., it's the present. It will still be the present to people in 3000 A.D.
It's only the past or future to us. The moment we currently exist in is still the present.
Without a present, Goku can't exist. This is inarguable.
That's not a feat, that's an outlier.AntorusTheBurningThrone said:Except, Trunks was capable of existing in another Timeline, in the Past, without any consequences. Meanwhile, Trunk's "present" was destroyed by Zeno. And yet when Trunks went back to his Timeline with Son Goku to grab Future Zeno, nothing happened. He can still live in his Present, even when it's all destroyed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_T1rhRxqts
Cause, if what you're saying were the case, then Trunks should've been erased with his Timeline, once Zeno destroyed it.
Who said this was a feat? I'm stating that you can live without a Present.DMB 1 said:That's not a feat, that's an outlier.AntorusTheBurningThrone said:Except, Trunks was capable of existing in another Timeline, in the Past, without any consequences. Meanwhile, Trunk's "present" was destroyed by Zeno. And yet when Trunks went back to his Timeline with Son Goku to grab Future Zeno, nothing happened. He can still live in his Present, even when it's all destroyed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_T1rhRxqts
Cause, if what you're saying were the case, then Trunks should've been erased with his Timeline, once Zeno destroyed it.
I mean, I can't counter this. You're right on that.The Everlasting said:You... really don't understandt he meaning of the word present, do you? The present is the moment you currently exist in. You can't "exist" in the past or future because, if you're there, that's your present. Again, to someone in 1000 B.C., that's the present, and to someone in 3000 A.D., that is also the present, because shock of all shocks, the present is not some weird immutable state of existence. It's just the moment you are currently experiencing.
"Yet, considering they are from different verses, I don't see how you can use this as evidence. Since, her getting defeated won't cause the DB Present to go..."
Where are you even getting this idea?
That's...exactly what I said.The real cal howard said:Except it's been confirmed multiple times that no one can beat the Omni King. No matter how Powerful they are. No matter the Immortality, either.