• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Granny and Slendrina's verse should be moved to FC/OC.

It’s True, but as vy said App Store isn’t reliable I think you get a license for any game you publish on App Store but it doesn’t mean you get the trademark for any character in the game, those are different things
I'm not sure if that works like that, the game content is part of the game, if you have a license for the game you should have a license for the content in it.

So, I think DVloper could get into legal trouble for that.

So, I have 2 suggestions.

1- Accept that this has as much validity as this and stick with the original plan.

2- Since DVloper's website only says that the license covers all GRANNY content, that means Slendrina is not licensed. So, we move the Slendrina series to FC/OC and leave the Granny series in vsbw.

And before you tell me "the Granny series makes a lot of references to the Slendrina series", The Twins does too, and it even has Granny and Grandpa, however, it's not canon to Granny. So having references to the Slendrina series doesn't mean they are canon to each other.
 
I'm not sure if that works like that, the game content is part of the game, if you have a license for the game you should have a license for the content in it.

So, I think DVloper could get into legal trouble for that.

So, I have 2 suggestions.

1- Accept that this has as much validity as this and stick with the original plan.

2- Since DVloper's website only says that the license covers all GRANNY content, that means Slendrina is not licensed. So, we move the Slendrina series to FC/OC and leave the Granny series in vsbw.

And before you tell me "the Granny series makes a lot of references to the Slendrina series", The Twins does too, and it even has Granny and Grandpa, however, it's not canon to Granny. So having references to the Slendrina series doesn't mean they are canon to each other.
But two Slendrina characters appears as actual antagonists especially Slendrina mother where there is no reference of it being non canon to granny saga, if there was. There would be a option to include her as enemy just like in the twins and granny 3
 
I'm not sure if that works like that, the game content is part of the game, if you have a license for the game you should have a license for the content in it.

So, I think DVloper could get into legal trouble for that.

So, I have 2 suggestions.

1- Accept that this has as much validity as this and stick with the original plan.

2- Since DVloper's website only says that the license covers all GRANNY content, that means Slendrina is not licensed. So, we move the Slendrina series to FC/OC and leave the Granny series in vsbw.

And before you tell me "the Granny series makes a lot of references to the Slendrina series", The Twins does too, and it even has Granny and Grandpa, however, it's not canon to Granny. So having references to the Slendrina series doesn't mean they are canon to each other.
This seems to make sense
 
But two Slendrina characters appears as actual antagonists
The same thing literally happens in The Twins and it's not canon yet. So, in the case of DVloper, the appearance of characters from other games is not an impediment for the series to be non-canon to each other.
 
But two Slendrina characters appears as actual antagonists especially Slendrina mother where there is no reference of it being non canon to granny saga, if there was. There would be a option to include her as enemy just like in the twins and granny 3
As I mentioned above, these franchises can collab with one another without sharing all its canon content.
 
The same thing literally happens in The Twins and it's not canon yet. So, in the case of DVloper, the appearance of characters from other games is not an impediment for the series to be non-canon to each other.
Why would dvloper make it so specific for Slendrina mother case then, surely he would have made a option to include her just like in twins
 
So is the current consensus that the slenderina stuff just simply isn't canon since it's not under the license of granny?
 
Why would dvloper make it so specific for Slendrina mother case then, surely he would have made a option to include her just like in twins
Maybe he wanted to put a reference.

If you think about it, Slendrina's mother being chained up there doesn't make much sense either. She is freed from her chains in Slendrina X and the castle is destroyed. So Granny couldn't have gotten a piece of the castle wall where Slendrina's mother is tied up, because the castle no longer existed and Slendrina's mother was free.
 
But doesn't really make sense also one of the endings shows granny with slendrina teddy bear
We already said that including material from other series does not make them canonical to each other, I will mention The Twins as many times as necessary.

Those would be non-canon versions of Slendrina.
 
The Granny series was a dream Slendrina had while she was in a coma after the castle was destroyed. :)
 
OP updated, I just noticed that the only profile here from the Slendrina series, is the Slendrina profile. It's the only profile that needs to be moved.
 
I still kind of think Slendrina is canon to granny. Like it's clearly the intent to make the two canon plus if it wasn't canon. Dvloper would have confirmed it himself just like with the twins being canon to Granny or not
 
Just now seeing this, but Slendrina is 100% a fan character, lol. I agree there

I could be wrong, but don't Slendrina and Granny appear in each other's games? Are we sure they're not canon to each other?
 
Just now seeing this, but Slendrina is 100% a fan character, lol. I agree there

I could be wrong, but don't Slendrina and Granny appear in each other's games? Are we sure they're not canon to each other?
They do. At least slendrina and the mother as well husband do. Shape disagrees because it could just be a Easter eggs which makes no sense there is clearly a intent to make the two connected. If it wasn't Dvloper would clarify it like how he clarified that the twins ain't canon. Plus it's also commonly agreed that Slendrina is canon
 
Yeah, I think Slendrina and Granny share a canon. They should both get moved to FC/OC
Dvlopper doesnt make eevry crossover between his games canon, like the twins and granny collabed but are confirmed to be not canon to each other, and also if you think of it a lot of slendrina additions in granny do not make sense considering slendrina timeline. Plus Granny is licensed and slendrina isnt.
 
Dvlopper doesnt make eevry crossover between his games canon, like the twins and granny collabed but are confirmed to be not canon to each other, and also if you think of it a lot of slendrina additions in granny do not make sense considering slendrina timeline. Plus Granny is licensed and slendrina isnt.
The additions makes sense. Granny could just take place after X plus surely Dvloper would have said something about it not being canon like with the twins
 
Granny contradicts the ending of Slendrina X.


The only reason DVloper explained that The Twins weren't canon to Granny's continuity is because someone asked him.
Yet nobody asks Dvloper about granny and Slendrina. Plus it's Popularly accepted that Both are canon which would just prove my point again. He haven't said anything about both being canon and also Dvloper also said something about tv cafe having nothing to do with him so and how does granny contradict Slendrina X?
 
Yet nobody asks Dvloper about granny and Slendrina. Plus it's Popularly accepted that Both are canon which would just prove my point again. He haven't said anything about both being canon and also Dvloper also said something about tv cafe having nothing to do with him so and how does granny contradict Slendrina X?
As the shape said, it doesn’t make sense, why did Angelene (not real name) broke free from her shackles in Slendrina x and is still in them in granny? It seems like a reference to the game if you ask me. Plus, on a legal sense, granny is explicitly licensed and Slendrina isn’t, end of story.
 
As the shape said, it doesn’t make sense, why did Angelene (not real name) broke free from her shackles in Slendrina x and is still in them in granny? It seems like a reference to the game if you ask me. Plus, on a legal sense, granny is explicitly licensed and Slendrina isn’t, end of story.
I doubt granny is licenced plus I mean the castle got destroyed right? It could just be because the shackles got destroyed so
 
Well, I was planning to make a CRT to update several characters from this verse but then I remembered something, Slenderman appears in some Slendrina games and has his own game made by DVloper in which Slendrina appears (Slender Man Rise Again). That's a problem because Slenderman is not a public domain character, and DVloper himself has admitted that he does not have permission to use the character. So, I think we should move the profiles and verse page to FC/OC.

Edit: Granny appears to be licensed, so she can stay here.

The Slendrina series, on the other hand, does not have it. Although the Granny series makes references to the Slendrina series, that has not been an impediment for other DVLoper games that do the same to not be canonical to each other. Not to mention that Granny contradicts the ending of Slendrina X.

Any current profiles that belong to the Slendrina series should be moved to FC/OC vsbw.
Granny doesnt contradict the ending of Slendrina X, and they are part of the same universe.
Neutral on moving slendrina to FC/OC
 
Granny doesnt contradict the ending of Slendrina X, and they are part of the same universe.
Neutral on moving slendrina to FC/OC
Prove it
(It really doesnt)
The Twins has shown us that references or appearances of characters from a certain series in a different series does not mean that both series share a universe. That is, appearances of characters from the Slendrina series in the Granny series are not evidence that they are part of the same universe, which forces you to prove otherwise with other types of evidence.

Although it is not vitally important, it is also worth mentioning that Granny is licensed, while Slendrina is not.

In Slendrina X, Slendrina's mother is freed from her chains, turns into a giant head and destroys the castle while Slendrina is trapped in a book. In Granny, Slendrina's mother appears chained again (something I explained here, it is a direct contradiction), Slendrina is free, etc.
 
Back
Top