Cory also directly compared it to that telescope image and directly said each geographical region contains entire universes multiple times.More essentially, it's actually a "greater universe" like Cory has stated prior. One that has yet to be fully explored.
Idk. Not as though it matters. The pantheons don't stop working like they do regardless of what the devs say.
He most prolly figured it out with Groa's prophecy and the mini-Fimbulwinter that Kratos caused upon his arrival to the Norse Pantheon.
but at the same timeJESUS ******* CHRIST
WHY ARE PEOPLE THIS ******* DESPERATE FOR WANK
you can’t trust what everyone says even if it’s the developersimagine entire GoW power scaling become messed up due to single tweet
Would Thor scaling to the Hippocampi be kept?
I mean , its only logical for WoG to be used on the basis of the credebility of the source and as much as I respect Bruno for his commitment towards the series , him saying Thanatos isn't a primordeal makes his WoG a bit....eh
Is this true guys
I think that would most likely be fine, if anything it'd add consistency to the Norse Pantheon scaling to the Greek Pantheon.
It'd mostly act as support, yeah.
He did say "I think" for Thanatos and stuff, so the only time I'd take him at face value is if his answers are concrete and accurately lines up with source material, like in the case of Primordials creating the Greek World and Atlas lifting it up which he concretely stated was true.
I don't remember WoG saying this but the novel definitely confirms this to be true, moment the curse wore off Kratos threatened to smash Baldur's bones to splinters.
That is already the rule and status quo, WoG is explicitly applicable only when it doesn't contradict the source material, as a result it falls under tertiary canon here, not including official interviews and actual bonus videos within the game.
Well it was this I said previously to you but never got a response
what I was suggesting was us turning that "it must not contradict the source material" rule into a "it must only be in support of something present in source material".
Now make a CRT about it, it would be epic.
I mean, that's there too in the editing rules:
Honestly tho, don't see the need at this point. Was just sharing my gripes about extreme ends of the spectrums of wank and downplay.
Reasonable , WoG should only ever be used to support what is in the source material already but never to make baseless assertions and/or contradiction the source material.
a giant can look like literally anything
Sorry, but what do you think about these thoughts of mine:
Baldur took pot shots at Jormie, so he'd downscale massively. Because Jormie came back swinging after hearing Atreus speak a few words.
Eh, nah, Eric confirms that 2018 Kratos is super-rusty Kratos, Ragnarok Kratos is not.
I still haven't figured out how to word that one, I'll add it in when I find the appropriate words.
It is a joke, and a terribly bad one at that. I've ripped it apart like, 5 times now at this point.
True, but Jormie (I am not gonna keep writing that long-ass name of his) still ate a ****-ton of Thor hits without being knocked out.
True, but that also could apply to his skills in combat.
How about "Kratos was afraid that he would kill an enraged Freya and struggled to restrain him"
Tbf he Could prolly looked for a conformation/debunk as well by confirming it's fakeJESUS ******* CHRIST
WHY ARE PEOPLE THIS ******* DESPERATE FOR WANK
From where is that?size manipulation for titans?
