- 683
- 199
Gonna have to disagree if this is the premise of the CRTWhat’s the confusion lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gonna have to disagree if this is the premise of the CRTWhat’s the confusion lol
If full powered ea cant even destroy avalon in stay night, what makes you think it can destroy the planet? Also it says multiple times in multiple works ea's ability is to reveal the true state of the planet, not destroy it.That's a pretty big presupposition do you have any basis for that outside of surtr which is a distinct circumstance to ea?
did you read the entire thread or just that 1 lineGonna have to disagree if this is the premise of the CRT
If full powered ea cant even destroy avalon in stay night, what makes you think it can destroy the planet? Also it says multiple times in multiple works ea's ability is to reveal the true state of the planet, not destroy it.
Ea can't destroy avalon because it is part of the reverse side of the world,where the soul of the planet exists.the counter force wouldn't allow that,meaning it will simply suppress the attempt.If full powered ea cant even destroy avalon in stay night, what makes you think it can destroy the planet? Also it says multiple times in multiple works ea's ability is to reveal the true state of the planet, not destroy it.
that just proves my point that ea isnt 1-c, a lot of people who disagree brought up that ea could destroy itI disagree
Ea can't destroy avalon because it is part of the reverse side of the world,where the soul of the planet exists.the counter force wouldn't allow that,meaning it will simply suppress the attempt.
"Planet Creating weapon"
"Used to enact genesis"
"World was born and destroyed seven times"
"Twisted and Tore the planet"
Not sure what you want me to tell you here buddy
You misunderstood the point,ea can destroy the world but it wouldn't destroy it because the counter force still exists.thats the thing holding it back.that just proves my point that ea isnt 1-c, a lot of people who disagree brought up that ea could destroy it
the counter force is like 70% of the reason why the earth is 1-c. also the counterforce can be used against lower threats, like the destruction of a texture.You misunderstood the point,ea can destroy the world but it wouldn't destroy it because the counter force still exists.thats the thing holding it back.
Ragnrok? I'll assume you mean Laevatein or Loptr Laegjarn and if so then yes, that's literally what it's rated as on the wiki plus it was literally compared to Rhongominyad don't see how it wouldn't get the Low 1-C rating.Are you saying ragnarok is 1-c as well? most of the same descriptions you were using were used there
The counter force is 1-c and so is the world,they are two seperate entitiesthe counter force is like 70% of the reason why the earth is 1-c. also the counterforce can be used against lower threats, like the destruction of a texture.
that event was literally stated to only destroy a texture, which is not the entire planet.Ragnrok? I'll assume you mean Laevatein or Loptr Laegjarn and if so then yes, that's literally what it's rated as on the wiki plus it was literally compared to Rhongominyad don't see how it wouldn't get the Low 1-C rating.
Moriarity destroyed an earth without a counter force.The counter force is 1-c and so is the world,they are two seperate entities
Ea is strong enough that it can destroy the world as shown multiple times in strange fake,ccc and materials.
However it is still a a earth born entity which means it cannot overcome the measures put forth by the counter force.there are two different things here you need to break through to destroy the world.
1.have raw power to destroy the world.
2.overcome the barrier put by counter force.
Ea can do the former but not the latter.
The laevatien from proper human history is what causes the destruction of the scandinavian texture.that event was literally stated to only destroy a texture, which is not the entire planet.
Then make a crt,Moriarty to 1-cMoriarity destroyed an earth without a counter force.
Archer (James Moriarty)
"Archer of Shinjuku" is an Archer-class Servant able to be summoned by Ritsuka Fujimaru in the Grand Orders of Fate/Grand Order. He debuts in the Shinjuku Sub-Singularity as the main antagonist. Archer's True Name is James Moriarty, the greatest nemesis of Sherlock Holmes. Despite his relative...vsbattles.fandom.com
It was also compared to In power directly to Rhongomyniad which not only fastens the reverse side and the human texture, but was also going to be used by Morgan to wipe out the Atlantic lostbelt. That in and of itself would make Laevatein Low 1-C, but ending the age of the Gods is Low 1-C as well since the reverse side is literally what the age of the Gods was before it ended and because well Gods existed and killing Gods in Nasu usually puts you at Low 1-C. Not only that but Loptr Laegjarn>>Surtr and well Surtr just straight up absorbed the power of a Fantasy tree and that tends to give Low 1-C too. Sooo I don't think this holds up as much as you think even ignoring the fact that Surtr explicitly destroyed all 9 Scandinavian realms.that event was literally stated to only destroy a texture, which is not the entire planet.
The age of gods ending doesnt kill gods, it just weakens them and makes them flee to the reverse side.It was also compared to In power directly to Rhongomyniad which not only fastens the reverse side and the human texture, but was also going to be used by Morgan to wipe out the Atlantic lostbelt. That in and of itself would make Laevatein Low 1-C, but ending the age of the Gods is Low 1-C as well since the reverse side is literally what the age of the Gods was before it ended and because well Gods existed and killing Gods in Nasu usually puts you at Low 1-C. Not only that but Loptr Laegjarn>>Surtr and well Surtr just straight up absorbed the power of a Fantasy tree and that tends to give Low 1-C too. Sooo I don't think this holds up as you think even ignoring the fact that Surtr explicitly destroyed all 9 Scandinavian realms.
So like I said if the entire premise of this CRT is "Anti-World Noble phantasms cant destroy the planet therefore no Low 1-C" I'm gonna have to disagree
Maybe, if you ignore the context as to "why" it ended. It was explicitly stated that all the Scandinavian gods died in the battle against Surtr though and Skadi is explicitly referred to as the "Last God" for this reason. So yes, Surtr ended the age of gods by killing all the Scandinavian gods except one in that pruned timeline. So again ending the age of the Gods in and of itself makes him Low 1-C.The age of gods ending doesnt kill gods, it just weakens them and makes them flee to the reverse side.
I really dont see a valid argument for his first key, uses the same destroying the world argument that ea doesMaybe, if you ignore the context as to "why" it ended. It was explicitly stated that all the Scandinavian gods died in the battle against Surtr though and Skadi is explicitly referred to as the "Last God" for this reason. So yes, Surtr ended the age of gods by killing all the Scandinavian gods except one in that pruned timeline. So again ending the age of the Gods in and of itself makes him Low 1-C.
Even ignoring this it doesn't change the fact that it's stated to be on par with Rhongomyniad and the fact that Loptr Laegjarn is his strongest attack and that's after absorbing the power of a fantasy tree.
Um maybe because Destroying the 9 Scandinavian realms=Low 1-C and also maybe because that statement comparing Laevatein to Rhongomyniad came before Surtr absorbed the Fantasy tree oh and maybe because Surtr>>>Lostbelt King Skadi. Could be any of them or all of the above, just saying.I really dont see a valid argument for his first key, uses the same destroying the world argument that ea does
A lot of people dont know the difference between np statuses. Anti world doesnt mean the np can destroy a planet, anti planet does, though.Bluntly put- Ea is not the only planet-busting NP, but in this case it's primarily the counter-force as to why Earth is so hard to destroy, so Ea being capable of destroying it makes it Tier 1 one way or another.
And that's also why Moriarty DOESN'T have tier 1, he was gonna destroy a doomed world and unlike Ea, there is 0 reason to assume it's ******* with any Tier 1 nonsense like Avalon or the other side, it's a big ****** meteor for gods' sake
Then why couldn't Moriarty destroy the planet without taking care of the counter-force hmmmm?A lot of people dont know the difference between np statuses. Anti world doesnt mean the np can destroy a planet, anti planet does, though.
Ea doesnt destroy the counter force, either. the counter force only gives a portion of its power to counter guardians, varying on the threat.
Ea cant even penetrate avalon itself.
Every singularity and lostbelt is a doomed world,doesnt stop them from having avalon.Bluntly put- Ea is not the only planet-busting NP, but in this case it's primarily the counter-force as to why Earth is so hard to destroy, so Ea being capable of destroying it makes it Tier 1 one way or another.
And that's also why Moriarty DOESN'T have tier 1, he was gonna destroy a doomed world and unlike Ea, there is 0 reason to assume it's ******* with any Tier 1 nonsense like Avalon or the other side, it's a big ****** meteor for gods' sake
Not explicitly called such mate, it was extremely explicit that there is 0 counter-force for PS 1Every singularity and lostbelt is a doomed world,doesnt stop them from having avalon.
avalon exists in the reverse side of the world which is the soul of the planet.nasu world cannot exist without avalon otherwise it will crumble down.
What does the counter force has to do with this?Not explicitly called such mate, it was extremely explicit that there is 0 counter-force for PS 1
Was LB6 called a doomed world? If not you really can't argue thisWhat does the counter force has to do with this?
Avalon is a 6d realm present in the reverse side,just because the counter force doesnt exist,doesnt mean avalon ceases to exist.
Especially since lb 6,a culled world,we forge excalibur in avalon proving that avalon does exist even in a doomed world.
I don't think you understand what i meant. i was arguing against moriarty being 1-c.Then why couldn't Moriarty destroy the planet without taking care of the counter-force hmmmm?
Honestly, your argument feels like it's based on disbelief
Disagree FRA
Here is the statement i can findWas LB6 called a doomed world? If not you really can't argue this
Which is from PS1. Lostbelts are their own history are they not?Here is the statement i can find
Holmes:
"...destroying the world is not possible."
"Goetia wasn't planning to destroy the world, even then, he needed 3000 years."
"However, if that world is cut off from history, it becomes possible. Basically..."
Ritsuka:
"It is possible to destroy a world that is separated from history?"
Holmes & Moriarty:
"SUBARASHII!!"
"But Gil didn't destroy Avalon!" Because there are 2 occasions he's used full power Ea that weren't F/SN that had it as a big attack without any fancy shit, if you don't believe me, show me where anything about F/SN Ea(and ONLY F/sn) where it ***** with time or space.I don't think you understand what i meant. i was arguing against moriarty being 1-c.
Gilgamesh failing to destroy avalon is just one giant anti feat against his tier rating imo
Which is from PS1. Lostbelts are their own history are they not?
I'm like 99% sure Fantasy trees are tier 1, right? That's always the idea I got from them anywayProper human history,the entire reason lostbelts even exist without getting culled is thanks to fantasy tree which is what we destroy,leaving the world to destroy itself in a couple months.
Hey man you can't blame us for marshadow being a special individual.This is what people wanted the Moon Cell thread discussion to look like, lol.
I'm reluctant to believe that was a full power ea considering the lack of destructive that power that came from it sooooIf full powered ea cant even destroy avalon in stay night, what makes you think it can destroy the planet?
It is said that it can reveal the truth of the worldAlso it says multiple times in multiple works ea's ability is to reveal the true state of the planet, not destroy it.
That's not his pointthat just proves my point that ea isnt 1-c, a lot of people who disagree brought up that ea could destroy it
Are you saying ragnarok is 1-c as well? most of the same descriptions you were using were used there
It just said the he once destroyed "world" , then went on to say it can destroy the planet too not that it once destroyed the planet.
Ah ye does it matter tho? Gilgamesh still has low 1-C via ea having the capacity to destroy what's physically there. He doesn't even have 1-C, possibly 1-C is for his extra ccc scaling.the counter force is like 70% of the reason why the earth is 1-c. also the counterforce can be used against lower threats, like the destruction of a texture.
It said it can destroy the entire planet not just world told it would include the textures marshadow, thanks for the reminder it's also compared to rhongo which holds the textures together.that event was literally stated to only destroy a texture, which is not the entire planet.
Tbf, Gilgamesh even admit in the visual novel he wasn’t holding back during their final confrontation and I seriously doubt that isn’t the case of him holding back as he was already overpowering Excalibur in a clash. You can see that in the videoI'm reluctant to believe that was a full power ea considering the lack of destructive that power that came from it soooo
Not to mention the Visual Novel is like decades old since it is expected as he didn’t originally have a chant for Ea
Also I just remembered here at 2:15, it specifically say he using Ea at its fullest maximum output
Ea was a pixie stick that did nothing but be a big attack in fate route. Get it rightTbf, Gilgamesh even admit in the visual novel he wasn’t holding back during their final confrontation and I seriously doubt that isn’t the case of him holding back as he was already overpowering Excalibur in a clash. You can see that in the video
Also alsoTbf, Gilgamesh even admit in the visual novel he wasn’t holding back during their final confrontation and I seriously doubt that isn’t the case of him holding back as he was already overpowering Excalibur in a clash. You can see that in the video