Hello everyone, East here back with another attempt to downgrade another character and this CRT we are going to focus on Yog-Sothoth of Gun Girl Z… okay it sounds cringe alright.
This is her profile and
this is when first it was brought up,
this is the CRT in which it was accepted.
The topic of today is… indeed, controversial, as we are going straight for a supposedly Tier-0 character downgrade.
So if you are knowledgeable about Tier-0 and have read the profile, you probably have understood the problem there, and maybe the CRT in which it was accepted didn't answer the questions. And that's why we are coming with this downgrade within this CRT.
It would be a short and straightforward CRT since the problems are clear and blatant.
Without much delay, let us start.
The Eternal Nameless Tao… merely a bubble of Yog-Sothoth?
So if you had read the profile itself, you see
this as the justification for Tier-0 in the Attack Potency section.
Why it is the problem?
Just read this,
RAW:
TL:
Co-dependent property with the bubbles? At first one thought this was referring to a lesser property and going by the way of "negation of divine properties" explanation (Apophatic theology). But is this justification truly enough?
Through the CRT, it accepted “because Nameless Tao”, yet as we see here the “Eternal Nameless Tao/Dao” is not so eternal after all and is merely another of Yog-Sothoth's bubbles, despite it also being
the essence of existence. It shows that trying to justify the state of Tier-0 for Yog-Sothoth via the Tao/Dao philosophy is nothing but
Nominal and Association Fallacy as the “Tao” in the verse doesn't share the same properties as the one from Philosophy.
Tao is the one in Taoism that is the ineffable, indivisible and eternal Tao that grounds everything. GGZ Yog being beyond it, pretty much defeats Tao's Primacy.
Which Yog-Sothoth's bubble defeats this metaphysical ground (which also was not properly established within the verse from start). Yog-Sothoth, with its description, negates the divine properties of Tao itself in a flawed way.
Beyond Definition & Description: Is it enough?
To continue, the very next link is
this, it is when the narrator speaks directly to us, the reader, and breaks the fourth wall actually, within the story of Praise My Lord.
When you read it, you see the line about Yog-Sothoth being beyond definition and description which confirms its ineffable essence, yet it also further confirms that the whole bubble description and the concept of Nameless Tao within was what it is, a description and a metaphor. So all that remains here is the fact that Yog-Sothoth is “beyond definition and description”, but is it enough for Tier-0? I do not think so, unless we give any character with any form of Apophatic Theology or Ineffable essence.
That can be said the only thing GGZ Yog-Sothoth has, and Transduality too due to transcending
Yin and Yang and
we know it exists in Babylon too due to Mother's description.
So you might wonder why we are not reaching out to anything new within CRT, and I agree with you. Because based on the profile and CRT, that's it. That was literally the entire Tier-0 justification for GGZ Yog-Sothoth, Ineffable essence, and of course “Tao” while as we see is merely a bubble of Yog-Sothoth and metamorphosis.
Generally, these are the whole argument.
Edit: as I expected, the CRT is in chaos, great,
so this summarization is for counterarguments and answers to them keeping the flow of the debate.
So I propose this:
1-A: True Form (via TD3 and Primacy).
L1-A: Avatar (scaling to cosmology).
After verse downgrade thread: L1-C, possibly L1-A (by virtue of being 1D+ to everything before it as the one who define boundaries by being beyond them, possibly her transcend over "all things"/"definition and description" be beyond concept of space-time in its entirety)
Unless more context is presented, I see the arguments for Tier-0 GGZ Yog-Sothoth insufficient, and nothing but a very charitable scale to the highest possible interpretation based on a false equivalence and misconception about Tao inverse.
Mod Votes:
Agrees:
@Antvasima ,
@DarkDragonMedeus,
@Vietthai96,
@Qawsedf234
Disagrees: