Vondoom
Username Only- 395
- 131
Nothing even or anything shown makes it so or even stated such.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
General DC Comics Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Confluctor
- Start date
-
- Tags
- dc comics
- 2,168
- 2,128
I heard from someone he absorbed crisis energy or something?
TimeTrapperFanBoy
He/Him- 193
- 181
1. Post-Crisis Superman surviving a sun-eater's implosion, which sent him back in time, should be moved to the "Pre-Death" section on his profile due to the feat being performed in a comic published in 1991.
2. "John Stewert tanks a supernova" calc listed on the DC Comics Verse page should use the lower end (5-A).
2. "John Stewert tanks a supernova" calc listed on the DC Comics Verse page should use the lower end (5-A).
- 5,879
- 1,072
Hi transcending
Vondoom
Username Only- 395
- 131
How is tanking a supernova planetary, please clarify?
It's him?
- 12,802
- 5,936
didn't he get banned
TimeTrapperFanBoy
He/Him- 193
- 181
- 15,562
- 16,190
It was calced at High 5-A, which you can see at the bottom of the calc.
Vondoom
Username Only- 395
- 131
Out of curiosity how do you know about the calc? No mention of it was done above
- 922
- 961
I don't think that feat is on his page. The one that's on his page right now is the one from Action Comics #847, from 2007. I think the 90s feat was rejected for some reason, though I don't exactly recall why.
TimeTrapperFanBoy
He/Him- 193
- 181
I know that but it was agreed upon in this thread to use the lower-end calc to justify Superman's first key (Varies, usually 7-B to 6-C, 5-A at peak). I'm just proposing that we post the lower-end calc on the DC verse page in the Post-Crisis AP and Durability calculation section.
I don't I just assume that the calc is still considered acceptable because it's on the verse page calculation section.
The 1991 sun eater feat is still on the post-absorption section in the Feats tab, where you click to Expand or Collapse the tab.
- 922
- 961
Ohhh that explains why I didn't find it with ctrl+F. In that case then yeah it should be moved to Pre-Death, unless there was a big problem with it. I should probably go check why it rejected before.
Edit: Okay this is why the feat was rejected, I'll read the comic later to see the full context and stuff.
Edit: Okay this is why the feat was rejected, I'll read the comic later to see the full context and stuff.
Last edited:
- 15,562
- 16,190
The 5-A isn’t a low-end, it’s literally an inaccurate calc that resulted from Amelia forgetting to take something into account, which the calc says.
It’s High 5-A. The 5-A end is unusable.
TimeTrapperFanBoy
He/Him- 193
- 181
Then where did 5-A Superman even come from? Shouldn't Supes be High 5-A as well since he scales above John Stewert? Why did we ignore the High 5-A calc in the Superman New Key Proposal thread?
- 15,562
- 16,190
You know Kyle Rayner and Wally West both have 5-A calcs, right?
As for why the High 5-A calc was ignored in that thread, that’s a good question.
- 15,562
- 16,190
Well, the 5-A for the Green Lanterns should be replaced with High 5-A because of John Stewart’s calc, as well as Traitor’s High 5-A calc that Kyle Rayner scales to.
Subsequently, Pre-Death Superman’s 5-A rating should be replaced with High 5-A as well.Tbh I still think it should be 4-B because of Doomsday scaling to the Justice League, but whatever
Subsequently, Pre-Death Superman’s 5-A rating should be replaced with High 5-A as well.
- 168,530
- 77,289
- 7,638
- 7,806
Regarding Tier 5 revisions, I recommend making a separate thread with all relevant feats compiled to determine the new scaling chains.
TimeTrapperFanBoy
He/Him- 193
- 181
My bad, I meant to say where did 5-A Superman (Pre Death of S) come from. As in were there any 5-A feats performed prior to Death of S, besides John Stewert tanking a supernova? I was under the impression that yall were referring to the 5-A estimate of the supernova feat in order to properly rank Pre Death of S Superman (his first key).
I agree with this although shouldn't all Post Crisis DC heralds, who have 5-A rankings on their profiles, be updated to High 5-A as well?
Is it okay for me to post a thread regarding that topic or should I leave that up to you?
- 7,638
- 7,806
To clarify, the High 5-A calc up for discussion is the Xanshi feat?
What source is the Traitor feat?
If so, I have concerns with the methodology of the calc.
What source is the Traitor feat?
If so, I have concerns with the methodology of the calc.
- 15,562
- 16,190
Traitor’s calc is also High 5-A.
- 7,638
- 7,806
Traitor Feat Source: Legends of the DC Universe Vol 1 #38 March, 2001
- 7,638
- 7,806
Traitor Calc = 1.3466741e+37 J (3.218 Ninatons) = 5-A
High 5-A = 6.906e+37 to 3.139e+40 Joules
Last edited:
- 5,879
- 1,072
No problem
- 2,786
- 358
I will find the feats
- 4,701
- 5,470
Hello, can Late Golden Age Superman and Golden Age Wonder Woman be used for a 2v2 match by our standards?
- 5,879
- 1,072
yes
- 168,530
- 77,289
See here:
Versus Threads that involve more than two characters (i.e. a 2v1) will only be added to profiles under specific circumstances, which are:
Versus Threads that involve more than two characters (i.e. a 2v1) will only be added to profiles under specific circumstances, which are:
- If a character canonically needs another character to fight at their full potential (i.e. Naofumi Iwatani and Raphtalia)
- If one character is useless on their own (i.e. Gentle Criminal and La Brava)
- If two characters are canonically known for fighting alongside one another frequently and supplement each other's skills in combat (i.e. Twinrova, Ice Climbers, and Batman and Robin)
- Or utilize summons or familiars as their primary combat method (i.e. Pokémon Trainers and Digimon Tamers).
- In addition, matches added this way must be limited to two participants per "team" to keep debates orderly and organized, with the exception being characters who primarily battle with summons or familiars. This rule mainly exists because it would create misleading results with weaker participants benefitting from stronger partners, and because it would be too messy to properly structure the win and loss sections with too many characters in each matchup result.
- Although matches with three characters or more on one side are generally not allowed due to the reasons mentioned above, an exception is done for groups that are indexed as teams or civilizations, given their inherent notability, and mainly in order to not bloat the character profile page matchup sections with the number of participants.
- 10,542
- 12,372
This is correct. They teamed up couple of times, but it's not frequent enough to be considered they are like a proper team.
- 15,562
- 16,190
- 12,802
- 5,936
does infinite^infinite universes mean high 1-b?
- 150
- 62
No it means low 1-C
Last edited:
- 12,802
- 5,936
i was looking at a thread 4 years ago and they said this was high 1-b. maybe they changed the tiering
- 150
- 62
Maybe they changed the level or the interpretation of this page at the time was different
i was looking at a thread 4 years ago and they said this was high 1-b. maybe they changed the tiering
aleph_1 (infinite^infinite) universes = Low 1-C
aleph_1 (infinite^infinite) higher dimensions = Low 1-A
