Garfield's Regenerationn

[Agnaa]

Why does Garfield still have Regenerationn when he's the example given on the thread linked on the regen page for invalid regen feats?

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Eficiente]

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2847700#45

I found what I was saying before, Iapitus was the one implying that Garfield & others have legit regen, so he should comment here.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

You should ask the members listed in the Garfield (Verse) page to comment here. I trust your sense of judgement though.

 

[Agnaa]

I've just asked Iapitus since I know he's defended the Regenerationn staying in the past. But if there's no input I'll ask the rest of the members.

 

[Iapitus_The_Impaler]

I feel like I remember that it was agreed that it should be removed despite my wishes at the time. If this is true, then it should probably be removed. I can look at it again if you want, but it's been forever

 

[Agnaa]

Ahh yeah, please check again.

 

[Iapitus_The_Impaler]

It looks like the people at the end of the thread acted as if it had been accepted without it actually being, well, accepted.

 

[Iapitus_The_Impaler]

I don't have time to go watch it, but I think we need to go watch Garfield gets real, which is canon, as it is about this iirc. It acknowledges that, as cartoon characters, any damage they take doesn't last, but I need to double check the context behind it

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

So should Regenerationn be removed then?

 

[Agnaa]

According to Iapitus, one of the canon movies establishes that the characters can regenerate. If this is true and the context justifies this, then the Regenerationn would stay, from my understanding of the Regenerationn rules.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That is probably fine then, but the degree of Regenerationn may need to be adjusted if we switch source.

 

[Iapitus_The_Impaler]

If I recall correctly, it isn't exactly Regenerationn but it can manifest as such. It could also be said to be a form of invulnerability. I'm gonna need to go find a way to watch it

I also remember the movie being pretty bad, but it's what we do for this vs debating lol

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thanks.

 

[Agnaa]

Hm, so should I keep bumping the thread then? Or should I wait a few weeks for you to get around to watching the movie?

 

[Agnaa]

Bump?

 

[Agnaa]

Bump?

 

[Antvasima]

You can ask him via his message wall to comment here again if you wish.

 

[Agnaa]

I asked him, and he said he doesn't mind if I keep bumping (to see if anyone else has an answer), or if I wait for him to watch the movie.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.

 

[Stalker_Maggot]

Tfw, Garfield unironically has a Low-High Regenerationn feat in the comics

 

[Antvasima]

What is that?

 

[Stalker_Maggot]

Garfield regenerated from being melted

Also, I have a question about Garfield's profile. Is it a Composite profile or does it only include canon stuff?

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That seems fine.

 

[Antvasima]

The profile is supposed to only include canon parts. We largely do not allow composite profiles anymore: Editing Rules

 

[Stalker_Maggot]

Kk, I don't really know what is considered canon for Garfield so

Would we assume something isn't canon if it isn't stated to be canon?

 

[Antvasima]

The newspaper strip is canon. The cartoons and the movies are separate continuities.

 

[Stalker_Maggot]

I assume the games and the comics (not the comic strips, the comics published by Bongo Comics) are the same way?

Also, I'm pretty sure that Garfield should get timestop removed as that comes from the cartoon iirc

 

[Antvasima]

I think so, yes.

Okay. That is fine.

 

[Blahblah9755]

The melting feat is the same situation as the feat in the thread linked in the OP, so it would still need to wait on proof of other regen from Iapitus.

 

[Stalker_Maggot]

I mean, he has also regenerted from stuff like burns and injuries before so

 

[Antvasima]

So which powers, and links to the associated feats, need to be removed from the page then?

 

[Stalker_Maggot]

Well I would suggest something like Time Stop being removed and his Regenerationn could be "Mid-Low, Low-High at it's peak. Regenerates from injures consistently. Regenerated after being melted, however, this is not combat acceptable"

 

[Antvasima]

That seems fine to me.

 

[Agnaa]

Wait wait wait no no no.

That feat you linked has the exact same issues as the one in the OP.

Show where he regenerated from burns and injuries in the comics, or Regenerationn will still have to be removed.

 

[Iapitus_The_Impaler]

Garfield gets real actually specifically deals with the comics in and of themselves. It's basically a story about the characters traversing the 4th wall between the comic and the """real""" world. It doesn't work if you say they are different from the Garfield in the strip