Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The note makes no sense to add when literally no other damage transfer user is held to the same standard. This is the clearest cut form of bias to hold one verse to a higher standard than any otherAntvasima said:Should I re-open the Gagamaru Chougasaki page so you or DontTalkDT can re-add the note?
Kumagawa also had time to ask what it was called (and Gagamaru had time to respond) before it was pushed onto him.InfiniteSped said:There seemed to be a bit of a delay when he pushed it to Medaka.
To literally quote what I said regarding this when it was originally added:Mr. Common Sense said:I really don't understand why the note is still there.
Usually when it comes to abilities which have some NLF factor I don't mind if just the canon description is used and the NLF potential isn't explicitely mentioned on the page. That is simply, because most of the time people don't assume abilities to have NLF extent, because they know that we would limit it to the highest showings. If you look at Gagamaru Chougasaki's vs-threads though you see it a lot that people assume Encounter to work against opponents with attacks much more powerful and fast than Encounter was ever shown or reliably stated to work against. Hence I would want to add a note to his page pointing that part out, so that discussions don't constantly involve that NLF. |