• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Future Trunks is the only Hero who can stop The End of all things!

i thought he could at least interact with the AE from this blog
Refer to this blog instead, it’s a little more elaborate.
That being said, I'm 99% sure Trunks can't interact with The End lol
So I looked up The End’s NEP justifications, and this is what I found:
I’m gonna be real for a second… I don’t really see the justifications for Nonexistent Physiology.
Paradoxical Nonexistence: Characters still exist, but paradoxically behave as if they don't when attacked. Equivalently, characters qualify which don't exist, but behave as if they do in some aspect other than their interaction with attacks and abilities.
I guess the argument was that The End was described as both “infinite and nothing” which can be extrapolated as “embodying existence and nonexistence,” but I don’t think that’s the best way to interpret “infinite” here? We hear of “infinite nothingness” all the time, it doesn’t indicate anything paradoxical. I don’t see what makes “infinite” antonymous with “nothingness.”

The thing about continuing to exist after the destruction of its incarnations just sounds like regular abstract existence and avatar creation justifications. Also, what is the other fundamental aspect of existence that The End lacks to qualify for NEP aspect type 5?

I feel like I’m missing some context here…
 
Back
Top