- 6,011
- 2,117
Both said "Die" and die
End.
End.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People have stated Fuku needs the other person to be mad or something like that before that works.The Causality said:Both said "Die" and die
End.
Indeed, it need some aggressive situatioAccelerate420 said:People have stated Fuku needs the other person to be mad or something like that before that works.
It's passive because it doesn't need words. Example nothing exists because wherever you try to do something you're "encountering" him which is kanji similar to "nothing". So any encounter by default is turned to nothing. Wrong conversion works like that most of the time, it doesn't need words.Accelerate420 said:It doesn't say that on the profile. Care to show proof for that? It states 'a weapon or tool'. Ars Magna is neither. From what it says in terms of Language it doesn't make sense for it to be passive either from my understanding.
I'm gonna go with saying that's probably not how it works, or there is a loop hole like what Schnee said. It obviously has to respond to something otherwise I don't see how he can be damaged whatsoever, and if it's malice like Schnee said, then Die will bypass. I need more proof from your side.Firephoenixearl said:It's passive because it doesn't need words. Example nothing exists because wherever you try to do something you're "encountering" him which is kanji similar to "nothing". So any encounter by default is turned to nothing. Wrong conversion works like that most of the time, it doesn't need words.Accelerate420 said:It doesn't say that on the profile. Care to show proof for that? It states 'a weapon or tool'. Ars Magna is neither. From what it says in terms of Language it doesn't make sense for it to be passive either from my understanding.
How so? Iirc the only time he opened with "Die" was when he was pissed offSchnee One said:There's no malice to "Die"
IIRC he did that once.Schnee One said:He did that literally every time
Schnee One said:There are no reasons for Fukurou winning
Lizzard thinks and wins.
Excuse me for my ignorance, but I want to confirm first, who are you referring to?The Causality said:The only vilain who didn't get punched FRA.
I can tell someone to die and think of someone dying, but that doesn't mean I'm directing malice. You can do these things through just indifference. Not that it matters because Ars Magna isn't a power that contains such things to begin with.Iapitus The Impaler said:I'm not sure why just cuz Izzard does it often doesn't make it not out of ill intent. Unless he is doing it for their own good, I'm pretty sure killing them still qualifies as a confrontation that would be erased.
Also, why are people thinking he won't open with sealing when he said he was going to against Iihiko, but decided against it due to it being only a temporary measure? (likely due to Iihiko's high skill meaning he could break the seals in a relatively short time frame like a month). Fukurou is fully willing to just pull out a card and seal an enemy
Styles are language based techniques and rely heavily on context. He went for cage, then silence, then death, but that doesn't mean he will always open with that. In addition, he showed in his fight the his son that in a snap decision he goes for CC instead, which would likely counter Izzard's attempts to finish the fight in one move.Paul Frank said:Because Fukurou's single encounter before he died had him start out with silent instead of sealing and he even decided against using it on Iihiko
I dont think murdering someone out of indifference is enough for it to not be called a confrontation. What do you mean it doesn't contain such things?Accelerate420 said:I can tell someone to die and think of someone dying, but that doesn't mean I'm directing malice. You can do these things through just indifference. Not that it matters because Ars Magna isn't a power that contains such things to begin with.
If you're setting the bar to confrontation then literally nothing could touch the character. I mean that Ars Magna doesn't act on malice or not and doesn't contain them since it's just a medium. It's all dependant on the imagination and thoughts. Izzard IC would feel indifference.Iapitus The Impaler said:I dont think murdering someone out of indifference is enough for it to not be called a confrontation. What do you mean it doesn't contain such things?Accelerate420 said:I can tell someone to die and think of someone dying, but that doesn't mean I'm directing malice. You can do these things through just indifference. Not that it matters because Ars Magna isn't a power that contains such things to begin with.
Izzard vs Fukurou. That's the opposing forces at work hereAccelerate420 said:There really is no opposing force though. You just die.