- 32,835
- 38,111
ahem"Lephyr said" doesn't mean it's in the rules, which it definitely isn't. I'll endorse Fuji applying these edits, if not their attitude.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ahem"Lephyr said" doesn't mean it's in the rules, which it definitely isn't. I'll endorse Fuji applying these edits, if not their attitude.
As we have already said, nowhere is it stated on that page that you'd need 5 to 7 approvals, only that it recommends a larger number. If you wish to contest this, make another staff discussion.
gonna be honest, nothing there says 5-7. it says 3 minimum, with at least 1 admin involved. by the words there, it could be 3 or 4. nothing explicitly says 5-7
Those are for the normal CRTs below Tier 1.gonna be honest, nothing there says 5-7. it says 3 minimum, with at least 1 admin involved. by the words there, it could be 3 or 4. nothing explicitly says 5-7
Your wish is not happening.have the edits been applied?
Those are for the normal CRTs below Tier 1.
For content revisions that affect Tier 2 or higher, the participation of at least one Administrator in the review and approval process is required.
there is nothing here that gives the specific number "5-7". It says "3 minimum", "1 admin should be involved", "should be conducted by a larger number of staff". sounds like a minimum of 4, which this CRT has alreadyThe review and approval of content revisions that affect tiers 1 and 0 or that are highly controversial should be conducted by a larger number of staff members in order to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed changes.
Then a concrete number should be applied across the board. Because this was certainly not the impression I had on many other prior Tier 1 threads.there is nothing here that gives the specific number "5-7". It says "3 minimum", "1 admin should be involved", "should be conducted by a larger number of staff". sounds like a minimum of 4, which this CRT has already
it may be best to do so, so we can avoid future confusionThen a concrete number should be applied across the board. Because this was certainly not the impression I had on many other prior Tier 1 threads.
The rule is 3.And that gets us to our 5 vote count.
About what?Proof?
Pocked dimensions can have sizes that varies, it doesn’t need to be small, also we have went through this mirror world point already.The void is called an infinite abyss but also a pocket dimensions....seems kinda contradictory. I also disagree with the mirror world being the whole humand world as we see it pretty evidently cutting off just outside the castle.
^^^I also disagree with the mirror world being the whole human world as we see it pretty evidently cutting off just outside the castle.
@Tanin_iver @Tony_di_bugalu @SYPHe5D @SuperSonicTL @Planck69 @Theglassman12 @LephyrTheRevanchist @Emirp sumitpo @Elizhaa @DarkDragonMedeus @Just_a_Random_Butler @Maverick_Zero_X @Abstractions@Tanin_iver @Tony_di_bugalu
Both of them aren't available. So I can't write provocative or flowery intro like them. So I'll just post link to blog.
GilverTheProtoAngelo/sandbox
vsbattles.fandom.com
Have at it.
Minus the hypertimeline stuff, which is new, this is almost entirely the same arguments as before (ie: the DW is infinitely larger than low 2-C and contains low 2-C structures within itself).@Tanin_iver @Tony_di_bugalu
Both of them aren't available. So I can't write provocative or flowery intro like them. So I'll just post link to blog.
GilverTheProtoAngelo/sandbox
vsbattles.fandom.com
Have at it.
Not currently, no. Is there anyone else who can do them right now? I can do them later today if not.Fuji, given that this thread is currently 5-1, it can be applied now. Are you able to handle the edits?
It is being contested right now this moment.Indeed, the policy is 3 votes.
And if they successfully contest it, we can update the policy, but that's not what the policy is now.It is being contested right now this moment.
Later today is fine, or even tomorrow. There's no rush.Not currently, no. Is there anyone else who can do them right now? I can do them later today if not.
Even the current policy states that 3 staff members are required alongside 1 admin, but that this alone does not guarantee a straight pass. So regardless of whether the bar stays the same or not, the above ruling would still apply and case-by-case basis would be needed.And if they successfully contest it, we can update the policy, but that's not what the policy is now.
So funny weather means dimension is cut off now?Snip
Where? This is no funny weather. We see it being cut off and be a standalone structure with nothing pointing to anything existing beyond that. If you have something to say to that then please post it.So funny weather means dimension is cut off now?
What did you expect? Dante to grab hold of a space-ship and travel over the space or sumthin? I have already addressed these arguements.
No, the current policy is that 2 staff votes are required, and that 3 might be required if the verse has a significant following, and that 1 admin is required for Tier 2 and above.Even the current policy states that 3 staff members are required alongside 1 admin, but that this alone does not guarantee a straight pass.
This thread started almost two months ago.Also, can we not rush CRTs generally?
Our policy is that 3 votes are required for popular verses. This has 5. It's been approved by enough staff.I don't think there's been nearly enough staff input on this thread for it to be a done deal that quickly
This just isn't a tenable approach. Arguments can go on basically forever if someone chooses to stonewall.And as far as I'm aware, we don't cut off threads mid-argument this way, especially in Tier 1.