"everything" meaning, more convicing evidece and theories. They are far more then what charlie has going for her.
i mean, you can say that those are more convincing......but i would need to see said theories to understand, don't you think?
My grammar is ass...
.... Tried to correct it, but I have never been great at explaining things...
i still don't get it, what evidence is for that "Where the evidence seems to point at it was an accident
and the first death"? Charlie also has a bunch of things to point her dying at 83 as well
That is where the main theories lies though. Also we don't know if Elizabeth or CC are the older one.
i would say that the parallel would suggest CC is the older with Elizabeth being a baby by the time of FNAF4, i don't think there is any evidence that they are even remotely close in age for it to be questionable
I've me some time, I don't have a direct way to get the exact lines right now, but the ones I remember in my head include
"Remeber what you saw"
"They come alive at night"
how does that serve as evidence that Elizabeth was the first death? all this proves is that CC saw something and that something must have happened prior to FNAF4 for a rumor to be stuck in place by the time of it
The mouth in the stomach is a pretty odd design choice for freedbear and Nightmare don't you think?
Nightmare is just Fredbear's Shadow, so to cover Fredbear................i mean, yeah? but then, why wouldn't the other ones have it if the fear would come from the same source? also it can just as easily be a parallel to the fact that Fredbear "ate" the child, thus the mouth being the center point of his fear since it was it that bit him
even then i.....still don't quite get why that would be linking to Elizabeth, unless you are saying that CC saw Eli dying by being "eaten" by Baby's belly.........which baby comfirmed there was only 1 child in the room when she killed Eli, so CC couldn't be there to see anything
Whetever he cares for them or not is a debate for his own, but personally I think he cares for them in his own twisted way.
yeah, me too, i think that he cared for them as much as they are "his" family, if that makes sense
'and Mid night motorist is still unsolved to this day, we don't even know if it was truly William or not...
i mean, "later that night", it is raining like the security puppet minigame, a purple car just like the "take the cake to the children",
That is actually not fully true, we have no evidence what so ever the MCI happened under a short time frame, only date that is guaranteed is the gabriel and Jermy(The reason why I mentioned these 2 names here is a theory of it's own, that is speculated by why these 2 are always together.) on of June 26 of 1985
which then is clarified in a later journal that instead of 2, 5 were now linked to the "incident" aka only 1 incident that mentioned in the previous newspapaer, hence why it is also said in that same newspaper that they were all lured to a backroom by someone in a costume, we do know they must have happened in the same day, as that is pretty much what is said to us
There is no evidence that Charlie was killed before her
"A wound
first inflicted
on me, but one that I let bleed out to
cause all of this" if he was talking about the MCI.....then the wound wouldn't be inflicted on him, but on the Children's parents, i don't see any other interpretation of that phrase that would make sense
, hell if we believe the gravestone orders to be correct, Charlie was after all of the missing children. The give gift, give life mini game doesn't really prove that Charlie was killed before or after the MCI, and most of the other mini games represent the DCI not the MCI.
that is also assuming that the gravestones were on the order they were killed.........which, is equally speculative and contradictory to "give gifts, give live" where Puppet was already with Charlie's soul by the time the MCI Children died
you didn't said anything in response to the fact Puppet was already haunted tho? i am a little confused now
Honestly, It is not confirmed by any means
neither is Mike being Michael, William being the UCN protagonist, Glitchtrap being the Mimic or William, etc, like, you can say it isn't confirmed, but like.....most lore of this series isn't, even the ones you are saying are equally not confirmed in the most part
, at the moment it is just a speculation before we get more clues, just like most other things in this franchise. After all there are many counter arguments. Including the grave order I mentioned above
which is contradictory to Give Gifts, Give Life......but yeah, most things are unconfirmed
another classic reason is the motivation for killing her.
if the Novels are any hint........Jealously and Madness on William's part
That is actually just a interpretation, the one I mentioned is also one interpretation, both are accepted in the Theorist community as possible explanations for it, while the other side just believes that he is just bullshiting....
you know, i think you just described the entire FNAF Fandom in one sentence lmao
Again it just symbolises an action taken towards him
yeah, on "him" specifically, the way he talks makes it sound personal to himself, we know he cares about the others as talks about how he repents that he let it "bleed out" to cause all of the series' events
you need to remember by no means is henry a good person or father.
what would suggest that? from the final dialogue he seems to be one to absolutely care for Charlie, plus the Initial trilogy also would suggest this
He could simply be talking about attacking him personally by damaging the brand.
it wouldn't be a personal attack on him, it would be one to the Children's parents as well, which wouldn't be "a wound on him" but a "wound on him and others"
I guess you don't usually stay much in the fnaf theory community then?
one can only keep track of so much
Either way, the 2 most common first death are Elizabeth and CC. This is wildly accepted in the theory community that one of his children must have died first.
Charlie is also one of the most wildly accepted