- 4,716
- 4,201
Oh boy there's alot wrong with this calc
Raoh's Goten Sho, my remake
vsbattles.fandom.com
I just remember him saying he was asking for help with it here:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Fist Of The North Star Revision Part 1 (P&A)
- Thread starter Stefano4444
- Start date
- Status
- 18,382
- 12,759
Hence why he (and I) would like help with it.
- 4,716
- 4,201
K first thing first
We have a new cloud formula using a calculator of the calculations page
Use that first
Second
The second angle is WAYYYY to steep in order to get accurate pixelscaling the way he did it
It's not getting bigger as it gets closer to the screen it's getting closer which make it APPEAR bigger
We have a new cloud formula using a calculator of the calculations page
Use that first
Second
The second angle is WAYYYY to steep in order to get accurate pixelscaling the way he did it
It's not getting bigger as it gets closer to the screen it's getting closer which make it APPEAR bigger
- 2,672
- 777
To make this actually usable you could use the safer timeframe I used, which was 10.14 seconds, which I explained in the calc: “it looks like the dispersion takes only 1.12 seconds, but given how the fireball starts small and only gets to its final size by around the end of the scene, so should the cloud circle”I see you didn't wait for me
I finished my calc and got some crazy results
Fist of the North Star Nuke
TLDR: 82.462 Zettatons of tnt (5-B)
Last edited:
- 2,672
- 777
Ok, in my defence, that formula wasn’t a thing back when I made the calc
i’ve already been told about the angle, but nobody can tell me anything about how to actually fix it
- 18,382
- 12,759
That would give us a value of 867.458 exatons, still WAY too high.
Last edited:
- 4,716
- 4,201
There is a way to "Fix" it
And there's an easy way and a hard annoying way
The easy way is you find the distance from the hole to your point of view
It seems you already done that so what you do is measure the size of the split right next to the hole and use that as your split diameter the entire way through
Find the height of the cloud in pixels where the spit diverges into two splits and ang-size again to get the distance
Multiple the split volume by two for the remaining distance you find
That will be your maximum lowball
Do note that it does not take into account the zig-zag of the splits which is why it's a maximum lowball
Now for the hard way
Every point where the split diverges you have to ang-size to find the distance using the clouds height
And for the zig-zag parts you will have to assume an angle for it (Since there no way that I know of to find an angle from nothing but length and viewing angle) and use Pythagorean theorem to find the length using the Ang-sized distance from two points
Similar to this calc - https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Second22/Genshin_Impact:_Albedo_creating_ice
One's way easier and will give use an idea of what level of AP we would get out of the calc if it was done the hard way
Do it the first way, see what you get and if it's still worth it do the calc
Stefano4444
He/Him- 6,179
- 5,285
- Thread starter
- #649
That's only Country level+.
- 69
- 45
Still, it's more than what Jagi got which is small country.
Last calc put said Nukes at only 3 Teratons.
- 18,382
- 12,759
Calc still needs approval
- 18,382
- 12,759
Kaioh actually got a major powerup while Jagi never did.
- 69
- 45
Sure, but power up doesn't equal 100% mode, otherwise most fighters would have 100% mode.
- 18,382
- 12,759
IIRC it's since he somewhat kept up with Ken's own 100% with his final power-up, plus he surpassed Kaioh and whatnot.
I forget the entire Kaioh scaling conundrum.
- 69
- 45
Nah bro, there's no evidence of Ken going 100% against Kaioh.
- 18,382
- 12,759
We're more or less waiting to see if Twellas can alter his Goten Sho calc successfully based on Shmeaty's advice.
If that's a bust or doesn't provide a high enough value, BoS Ken scales to the 62 teraton nukes in Shmeaty's calc since apparently Twellas's nuke calc is not correct.
- 9,859
- 11,123
- 69
- 45
We're also waiting for an evaluation of @Shmeatywerbenmanjenson calc of Toki movie Nukes.
- 18,382
- 12,759
That too.
- 4,716
- 4,201
Show
- 18,382
- 12,759
Ped2018
He/Him- 4,926
- 5,869
The feat, he's asking to show him the feat
- 4,716
- 4,201
Yes
- 18,382
- 12,759
I mean, what we need is for calc people to evaluate the feat.
- 4,716
- 4,201
I need the feat!
Give it to me!
- 18,382
- 12,759
Aren't we talking about the nuke feat you already made?!
- 4,716
- 4,201
I misread
- 2,672
- 777
Guys, I have to study for my exams, so I won't be around all that much anymore, I won't have time to do calcs or even be as active as I was on the thread. I'm gonna pop in every once in a while and give my two cents on whatever you guys are talking about. In case y'all have some pressing questions to ask just send me a pm on discord at Twellas#6925, so I can see it and join in.
Maybe @Shmeatywerbenmanjenson can fix my Raoh calc? In case nobody can, I guess all you can do is talk about the scaling back and forth until I'm back, which I don't think is optimal.
Maybe @Shmeatywerbenmanjenson can fix my Raoh calc? In case nobody can, I guess all you can do is talk about the scaling back and forth until I'm back, which I don't think is optimal.
- 4,716
- 4,201
- 18,382
- 12,759
But he just said that he's going to be too busy to do that.
- 4,716
- 4,201
Well he asked me to fix it in his farewell post which to me seems like I didn't explain well enough above
- 18,382
- 12,759
Well if you by any chance could try doing a remake of his calc yourself, I would greatly appreciate it.
- 4,716
- 4,201
When I get the chance I'll try my hand at it
- 18,382
- 12,759
Thank you very much.
- Status
Similar threads
