- 13,119
- 20,830
Hey all, Dragon here. Props to anyone who gets that reference, by the way. This calc group discussion thread is gonna be all about Erza's current speed feat. There are two ends: 2.23% SoL (Sub-Relativistic) and 10.67% SoL (Relativistic). The difference in these is dependent on one thing: the distance Erza was at when she swung her sword.
The Sub-Relativistic end gets the closest distance shown between Erza and the meteor (which ended up being 9.717 meters) and assumes she swung her sword then. However, the Relativistic end assumes Erza swung right as she got in range to do so, and thus uses Erza's arm + sword length to get the circumference of a half-circle (as she swung 180 degrees) and uses that as the distance.
The low-end is what was accepted, but in this thread, I want to suggest using the high-end. Here's why:
We see in these back-to-back scans that Erza didn't actually swing her sword until she was right at the meteor. The Sub-Relativistic end is inconsistent with what's shown in the scans, and the scans lean much more to the idea that Erza swung her sword when she got in range to do so, which is what the Relativistic end goes with. As such, I propose that it be used instead of the Sub-Relativistic end.
I'd also like to hear the thoughts of other calc group members on this.
The Sub-Relativistic end gets the closest distance shown between Erza and the meteor (which ended up being 9.717 meters) and assumes she swung her sword then. However, the Relativistic end assumes Erza swung right as she got in range to do so, and thus uses Erza's arm + sword length to get the circumference of a half-circle (as she swung 180 degrees) and uses that as the distance.
The low-end is what was accepted, but in this thread, I want to suggest using the high-end. Here's why:
We see in these back-to-back scans that Erza didn't actually swing her sword until she was right at the meteor. The Sub-Relativistic end is inconsistent with what's shown in the scans, and the scans lean much more to the idea that Erza swung her sword when she got in range to do so, which is what the Relativistic end goes with. As such, I propose that it be used instead of the Sub-Relativistic end.
I'd also like to hear the thoughts of other calc group members on this.
Last edited: