- 167,680
- 76,259
Probably, yes, but it may be best to wait for DontTalk first.Could this be added as a standard calc for ripping hearts out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably, yes, but it may be best to wait for DontTalk first.Could this be added as a standard calc for ripping hearts out?
Nah, there can be many timeframes to consider.Looking at this calc, can this be a standard for travelling across the entire earth in seconds?
Looking at this calc, can this be a standard for travelling across the entire earth in seconds?
Interesting, wonder if it could be viable enough for it to be added as a common feat calcPopeye The Sailor Man The Assorted Feats
vsbattles.fandom.com
I have another one
Looking at this calc, can this be a standard for travelling across the entire earth in seconds?
What do you think, @DontTalkDT ?Popeye The Sailor Man The Assorted Feats
vsbattles.fandom.com
I have another one
What do you think about this? @DontTalkDTCould this be added as a standard calc for ripping hearts out?
If the others are ok with it I'm too. The calc makes case-specific assumptions, though (sternum instead of rips) which would need to be mentioned when converting it for common feats.What do you think about this? @DontTalkDT
Migue and I have had some tsunami calculation methods. Want to see?did anyone mention creating tsunamis or something like that?
@Antvasima Well first, I'd like to propose a bit of a cleanup of the RfCF page before we add anything else. Was thinking of copying the entire source code for it and correcting all the grammatical errors and saving up some space for it, but I have already made several corrections to the grammar and spelling on the page. Also, there was a broken link in the Weather Feats section, so I fixed it.Can somebody remind me what we currently need to do here please?
Well, according to different types of feats I suppose, such as breaking common objects, explosions, and the like, but more complex instructions are probably needed.Yes but this requires some quality time from me or (even better) feedback from you all.
Like, how should even common feats be categorised? I have made a small recategorisation at my own blog (with "older" feats)
Would like to hear your feedback.
Looking at this calc, I've been into thought about this for a while now. Can this be used a reference as to growing and shrinking planets such as earth simultaneously? (I mean the calced bottom section obviously.)
Buttersamuri is notably unreliable, if I remember correctly.
Okay.I meant by DT and Ugarik's value
It seems fine to me at least.Can we add surface wiping feats to the common feats reference page?
Average Surface Destruction
vsbattles.fandom.com
It’s already there.Can we add surface wiping feats to the common feats reference page?
Average Surface Destruction
vsbattles.fandom.com
This was accepted like, long back.
I am thinking:Can we add surface wiping feats to the common feats reference page?
Average Surface Destruction
vsbattles.fandom.com
Like this maybe, except a beam or energy ball creates an explosion on contact?Can you even imagine how a fireball such radius could actually achieve surface wiping? Can anyone even imagine how such is achieved?
And therein lies the problem. 6375000 m is the radius (The distance you'd get if you dug halfway through the Earth), that's not what we want to use here nor is it what's being used there. We want the Earth's circumference of 40075 km (The distance you achieve when you travel in a straight line around the Earth.I am thinking:
Why is the blast radius of 2*PI()*6375000m/2 being used.
And therein lies the problem. 6375000 m is the radius (The distance you'd get if you dug halfway through the Earth), that's not what we want to use here nor is it what's being used there. We want the Earth's circumference of 40075 km (The distance you achieve when you travel in a straight line around the Earth.
Think of it like this, imagine the Earth's surface being spread out like the Flat Earth stuff and being 40000 km in diameter. The Explosion covering the entire thing would thus have a radius of 20000 km. Same thing here, except the world is round.
Great.Like this maybe, except a beam or energy ball creates an explosion on contact?
But it's already there, it notes down Earth's circumference and the explosive radius being half that and whatnot. Ugarik also noted down in the comments that this is how Therefir did the calc when the other guy thought radius of Earth was being used, when in fact it was the circumference.Great.
Make sure a simplified explanation of the rationale of using such blast radius is drafted and added to the calculation.
Much obliged.I appreciate your help. Thanks.
I mean, something like: (okay I am drafting this by myself)But it's already there, it notes down Earth's circumference and the explosive radius being half that and whatnot. Ugarik also noted down in the comments that this is how Therefir did the calc when the other guy thought radius of Earth was being used, when in fact it was the circumference.