Expanding the References for Common Feats page

[Gewsbumpz_dude]

Whatever happened to the guy tho.

Wokistan, back before this forum we are currently speaking on existed, basically exposed him of making wank calcs for his verses, particularly King of the Hill for some reason. Ever since that day he hasn't spoken afaik.

But anyway, I'm surprised that there isn't a calc for brick busting on our References for Common Feats page considering how common of a feat it is both in real life and in fiction.

 

[KLOL506]

Wokistan, back before this forum we are currently speaking on existed, basically exposed him of making wank calcs for his verses, particularly King of the Hill for some reason. Ever since that day he hasn't spoken afaik.

But anyway, I'm surprised that there isn't a calc for brick busting on our References for Common Feats page considering how common of a feat it is both in real life and in fiction.

We usually just put in the feat with concrete busting, given that most bricks these days are now made of solid concrete.

 

[Propellus]

Wokistan, back before this forum we are currently speaking on existed, basically exposed him of making wank calcs for his verses, particularly King of the Hill for some reason. Ever since that day he hasn't spoken afaik.

So that's why he left?

 

[Gewsbumpz_dude]

So that's why he left?

From the best of my memory, yes.

We usually just put in the feat with concrete busting, given that most bricks these days are now made of solid concrete.

That's alright, but wouldn't it still help to have a calc specifically for brick busting? I feel like that deserves a calc more than golf ball crushing.

 

[KLOL506]

From the best of my memory, yes.



That's alright, but wouldn't it still help to have a calc specifically for brick busting? I feel like that deserves a calc more than golf ball crushing.

I remember there being a dimension statistic for brick, but these days they can vary in size.

 

[Gewsbumpz_dude]

I remember there being a dimension statistic for brick, but these days they can vary in size.

Yeah but I don't think that stops brick busting from getting a calc. A Google search lead me to a guide that not only gives the dimensions of a standard brick but all other kinds of bricks.

 

[Propellus]

But anyways, Is it possible to add punching holes through pillars made out of materials such as stone, limestone, concrete etc.?

 

[Propellus]

Looking at this as an example

 

[Antvasima]

To rearrange the order of feats displayed.
This will ultimately lead to a more coherent view of feat yield calculation displayed.

That is obviously perfectly fine if you are the one doing it. Thank you very much for helping out.

 

[Antvasima]

Yeah but I don't think that stops brick busting from getting a calc. A Google search lead me to a guide that not only gives the dimensions of a standard brick but all other kinds of bricks.

That seems like a good idea to base some standard calculations on then. Would you be willing to handle it, @KLOL506 ?

 

[Jasonsith]

That seems like a good idea to base some standard calculations on then. Would you be willing to handle it, @KLOL506 ?

Values at the table should be fine to work with.
The problem is that... When there are a lot of bricks that comes in different sizes, and one character can break different numbers of bricks at different degree of destruction, is breaking a brick even a standardized "common feat" to begin with?

 

[Antvasima]

That is a good point. Perhaps it is unrealistic to add standard feats for this then.

 

[KLOL506]

Values at the table should be fine to work with.
The problem is that... When there are a lot of bricks that comes in different sizes, and one character can break different numbers of bricks at different degree of destruction, is breaking a brick even a standardized "common feat" to begin with?

Brick walls? Maybe, but even those have to be pixel-scaled first. But singular bricks? Not common enough to make the mark.

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

I see my crushing into diamonds calc on the references page, but I remember it getting rejected, just wish to know why it's on there then

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for the information. Perhaps it should be removed then? What do the calc group members here think?

 

[Omnificence]

I see my crushing into diamonds calc on the references page, but I remember it getting rejected, just wish to know why it's on there then

Well, there doesn't seem to be a problem with that calc here...

 

[KLOL506]

I see my crushing into diamonds calc on the references page, but I remember it getting rejected, just wish to know why it's on there then

Only person who's done it multiple times to my knowledge is versions of Superman, maybe explains why it's not so common out there.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. So Spino also made a calc for such a feat, and that is what we used then?

 

[Jasonsith]

To the speed required to run on water thing:

I realise one problem: have we seen the formula used in deriving leg movement speed and horizontal velocity?

---

Do you want a crush diamond feat or a crush coal into diamond feat? Or both?

Equestria Girls: Sunset Shimmer crushes a skull with her bare hands

vsbattles.fandom.com

Superman crushes diamonds (DCEU)

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

Well, this is my calc:

Crushing carbon to create diamond

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

Appears to me that this was calced incorrectly

 

[Antvasima]

Appears to me that this was calced incorrectly

What do you think, @Jasonsith , @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan , and @KLOL506 ?

 

[Jasonsith]

What do you think, @Jasonsith , @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan , and @KLOL506 ?

Doing a quick redux on that - done

Nanatsu no Taizai - Destroying Britannia Redux

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out.

 

[Jasonsith]

@Jasonsith I think it's supposed to be (449995/0.28)^3, not ((449.995/0.28)^3)/1E9

I posted my concern because the original calc didn't convert km to m

I fixed the calc to avoid any ambiguity.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for the help. It is appreciated.

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

Just to ask, what's with multiplying the end result by 1000?

 

[Omnificence]

Here's my version of the water running calc.

Alright, we'll come back to that.

As for our speed section, we have two blogs that deal with running on water. Which one should we add to the page?

DT's version is the one to choose.

DontTalk is almost always very reliable, yes.

Great! Now we just need a volunteer to add it to the page. Who'd like to do it?

I can do it. Where should I add the feat in the Common Feats page?

I think it'd be best to add it in the Speed Feats section.

Have we reached a conclusion here?

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

Kinda questioning the logic of this calc since this calc in comparison didn't rely on melting values

 

[Jasonsith]

Have we reached a conclusion here?

Some questions remain:
Does the 1.025 m refer to the movement distance of the feet in water?
AFAIK only the 0.725 m is the horizontal displacement. Perhaps this may change the analysis.

And... (the yellow elephant in the room) what is the formula used for for the calculator? Anyone can actually write that out? Thanks.

 

[Antvasima]

Which calc group members do you need help from here? Would Spino and KLOL be enough?

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

Kinda questioning the logic of this calc since this calc in comparison didn't rely on melting values

 

[Gewsbumpz_dude]

Yeah but I don't think that stops brick busting from getting a calc. A Google search lead me to a guide that not only gives the dimensions of a standard brick but all other kinds of bricks.

Any update on this?

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

I don't see limestone listed here, and why is the specific heat of granite different to here?

 

[Dalesean027]

do we have a common feat calc for what it takes to quickly rip off someone's arms, legs, or head?

 

[KLOL506]

do we have a common feat calc for what it takes to quickly rip off someone's arms, legs, or head?

@Migue79 and I found the yield to be anywhere from Class 5 (If you take a poor-health guy like me) to Class 25 (Normal men arm) here, but more calc members need to evaluate it.

@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Jasonsith @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan

 

[Hagane_no_Saiyajin]

I'm looking at here and I'm just wonder if for wood pulverization, we should be taking into account the modulus of elesticity or not

 

[Antvasima]

Some questions remain:
Does the 1.025 m refer to the movement distance of the feet in water?
AFAIK only the 0.725 m is the horizontal displacement. Perhaps this may change the analysis.

And... (the yellow elephant in the room) what is the formula used for for the calculator? Anyone can actually write that out? Thanks.

Which calc group members do you need help from here? Would Spino and KLOL be enough?

@Jasonsith

 

[Jasonsith]

Which calc group members do you need help from here? Would Spino and KLOL be enough?

I cannot find the exact formula for running on water, and basically any help would be appreciated.
But on the other hand if you only want the revised speed value I believe I can force run the data using the web calculator by weekend or even Friday night.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. If you write an explanation for exactly what you need help with, I can ask a few other experienced calc group members for help if you wish.