- 6
- 1
Let's start with the truest thing that can be said about Tier 0: The fact that you cannot describe it unless you are of Tier 0 yourself.
"The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao" - Laozi
And it makes sense because Tier 0 implies nonduality which cannot ever be grasped by a dual mind. That's like saying Mario can trace a 3D motion in a game where he can only trace 2D motions. The conclusion is in the premise, the proof's in the pudding. You can't do something if you can't do it, and so it becomes tautologically true that you can't do it by definition. You can't grasp an Absolute with a non-absolute mind. But what inferences can we make about a Tier 0 Being?
So first let's assume they exist. Conceptually, fictionally, metaphysically, even if it's just for the sake of argument. One sure thing is that they at least exist, similar to the epistemological truth: "I think, therefore I am" - "We assume, therefore they are". I say this because a Tier 0 Being could be crazy enough so as to make itself exist and not exist at the same time, but I think that's the only feat they can't truly pull which is mirrored by the quote that you MUST be if you THINK. That was the quote's purpose, not to allude to solipsism or to clear physicalist bias. Although these are 2 very good other uses. I digress. Ok, so we have 2 things laid out: 1) They exist; 2) They most likely can not not exist. But after saying this... things cease to be as clear-cut and you enter complete chaos. What sort of chaos? The kind of chaos that completely negates and simultaneously affirms everything: This is where the law of noncontradiction breaks.
A Tier 0 being can freely toy with contradictions. They can make square circles, they can make it so a thing exists and doesn't exist at the same time, and I'd say such existence EATS square circles for breakfast. I'd also say this is what truly differentiates a high 1-A being from a Tier 0 Being: The ability to toy with contradictions. That's the trademark of a truly Absolute being or Absolute-Level Hax because contradictions are the most taboo things there can be for the dual mind. High 1-A is dual, maximally strong, but not Absolute. And you might say: "I know this character that can toy with contradictions and they are not Tier 0". That just means the character has Tier 0 Level Hax, but they themselves are not Tier 0. CHIM from TES and Mystic Eyes of Death Perception from Nasuverse are good examples of that.
So what else can we say about Tier 0? This is where it gets really fun: What can be said with Certainty is that there's only 1 Tier 0 Being. That's right, just 1. Not 2, not 3, 4, etc. Why is that? Because it doesn't make any sense to say otherwise. If you assume that there can be 2 Absolute beings then that means neither is Absolute, because one ends when the other begins. You can't ever say that there can be more than 2 Tier 0 Beings, let alone question what would happen if they would fight (they'd stalemate). You can say that a Tier 0 Being can split into 2 or an infinite number of maximally strong High 1-A beings (and even then it exists above them), but never multiple Tier 0 Beings. And that "split" is precisely what the creation of a Tier 0 Being is: A Dream where they play as if they are not of Tier 0. Because according to my calculations being Tier 0 is the most boring thing there can possibly be, by definition.
A Tier 0 Being cannot truly know what it means to be Tier 0 until they experience not being of Tier 0. An Absolute Being has everything, except the ability to not have. So that's why Tier 0 goes to bed and dreams a lot, they do as such because they need to gain context of themselves. They need to experience "The Dream", otherwise known as "Samsara" in Buddhism and Jainism in order to appreciate the opposite. "The Dream" is different from the Absolute in the sense that it is finite. In the endpoint of Absolute, things can exist and not exist at the same time, but in the finite, some things end only for others to begin. And that is what allows for things to be exciting, something they want. It makes sense, when you play a game you want it to be hard. But despite it being riddled with predicaments, even that existence is perfect because it's just a rearrangement of The Tier 0 Being. Pain just makes a fun existence in which you can appreciate not pain be possible. So that's why you should accept life as it is, everything has a purpose.
Ahem.. That's why "The Dream" is a reoccurring theme in fiction: Tier 0 never really becomes separate from their creation, the creation is them expressed differently. And that's why everything in the Omniverse is God. Even a wall-level dude is a nerfed Tier 0 Being <--- quote that. Just like in a dream where the characters present are not different people from you, they are still you. You are not this finite, insignificant being that's separate from everything else. Any character at any given time is the Game Master, the player, and the game all at the same time. Everything is God. A Boundless a priori entails that by definition.
But let's dial back a bit... if The Tier 0 Being is Absolute and can only be 1, then that implies they are Omniversal+, and that also implies they are meta-permeant. So by definition, every single universe or creation, fictional or not, is traceable back to the same Tier 0 Being. So every "tier 0 being" we know of isn't actually Tier 0, but they might be the closest that can be referred to as tier 0 by characters from a universe or if we're gonna be more meta, by a writer which functions in duality by definition, unable to touch The Tier 0 Being with their pen. Writers are like High 1-A beings, but never Tier 0. This is sort of like the ontological argument. So Azathot, Maria, The Godhead from TES, The Root from Nasuverse, are the same being, and so is every other being. The lore through meta might tell different, but meta constructs do not constitute boundaries to The Boundless Being.
Another interesting thing to note is that if we assume all this, The Tier 0 Being is both infinitely good and infinitely evil... but the good news is it cannot ever do anything bad to another thing other than itself. So morality is objective and yet subjective because on a fundamental level there is no difference between the 2, there is just [ ]. But the other good news is, there is a differentiation between good and bad, it just needs to be defined in any given universe/creation.
Honestly, The Tier 0 Being is the best waifu in existence. When everything goes back to them, I want to be the only one that doesn't melt back into Tier 0. I want to achieve a sort of CHIM and keep them company forever so they don't have to make Omniverses filled with suffering, and these Omniverses wouldn't even be needed anymore.
So that's pretty much all I have to say. I'd give some amazing links to sources about stuff that I talked about but... I don't want it to look like I'm shilling people. One person I'll shill is Carl Jung, get into his books if you like this sort of stuff.
So if I'd have to sum up reality in one word this is the word I'd use:
"The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao" - Laozi
And it makes sense because Tier 0 implies nonduality which cannot ever be grasped by a dual mind. That's like saying Mario can trace a 3D motion in a game where he can only trace 2D motions. The conclusion is in the premise, the proof's in the pudding. You can't do something if you can't do it, and so it becomes tautologically true that you can't do it by definition. You can't grasp an Absolute with a non-absolute mind. But what inferences can we make about a Tier 0 Being?
So first let's assume they exist. Conceptually, fictionally, metaphysically, even if it's just for the sake of argument. One sure thing is that they at least exist, similar to the epistemological truth: "I think, therefore I am" - "We assume, therefore they are". I say this because a Tier 0 Being could be crazy enough so as to make itself exist and not exist at the same time, but I think that's the only feat they can't truly pull which is mirrored by the quote that you MUST be if you THINK. That was the quote's purpose, not to allude to solipsism or to clear physicalist bias. Although these are 2 very good other uses. I digress. Ok, so we have 2 things laid out: 1) They exist; 2) They most likely can not not exist. But after saying this... things cease to be as clear-cut and you enter complete chaos. What sort of chaos? The kind of chaos that completely negates and simultaneously affirms everything: This is where the law of noncontradiction breaks.
A Tier 0 being can freely toy with contradictions. They can make square circles, they can make it so a thing exists and doesn't exist at the same time, and I'd say such existence EATS square circles for breakfast. I'd also say this is what truly differentiates a high 1-A being from a Tier 0 Being: The ability to toy with contradictions. That's the trademark of a truly Absolute being or Absolute-Level Hax because contradictions are the most taboo things there can be for the dual mind. High 1-A is dual, maximally strong, but not Absolute. And you might say: "I know this character that can toy with contradictions and they are not Tier 0". That just means the character has Tier 0 Level Hax, but they themselves are not Tier 0. CHIM from TES and Mystic Eyes of Death Perception from Nasuverse are good examples of that.
So what else can we say about Tier 0? This is where it gets really fun: What can be said with Certainty is that there's only 1 Tier 0 Being. That's right, just 1. Not 2, not 3, 4, etc. Why is that? Because it doesn't make any sense to say otherwise. If you assume that there can be 2 Absolute beings then that means neither is Absolute, because one ends when the other begins. You can't ever say that there can be more than 2 Tier 0 Beings, let alone question what would happen if they would fight (they'd stalemate). You can say that a Tier 0 Being can split into 2 or an infinite number of maximally strong High 1-A beings (and even then it exists above them), but never multiple Tier 0 Beings. And that "split" is precisely what the creation of a Tier 0 Being is: A Dream where they play as if they are not of Tier 0. Because according to my calculations being Tier 0 is the most boring thing there can possibly be, by definition.
A Tier 0 Being cannot truly know what it means to be Tier 0 until they experience not being of Tier 0. An Absolute Being has everything, except the ability to not have. So that's why Tier 0 goes to bed and dreams a lot, they do as such because they need to gain context of themselves. They need to experience "The Dream", otherwise known as "Samsara" in Buddhism and Jainism in order to appreciate the opposite. "The Dream" is different from the Absolute in the sense that it is finite. In the endpoint of Absolute, things can exist and not exist at the same time, but in the finite, some things end only for others to begin. And that is what allows for things to be exciting, something they want. It makes sense, when you play a game you want it to be hard. But despite it being riddled with predicaments, even that existence is perfect because it's just a rearrangement of The Tier 0 Being. Pain just makes a fun existence in which you can appreciate not pain be possible. So that's why you should accept life as it is, everything has a purpose.
Ahem.. That's why "The Dream" is a reoccurring theme in fiction: Tier 0 never really becomes separate from their creation, the creation is them expressed differently. And that's why everything in the Omniverse is God. Even a wall-level dude is a nerfed Tier 0 Being <--- quote that. Just like in a dream where the characters present are not different people from you, they are still you. You are not this finite, insignificant being that's separate from everything else. Any character at any given time is the Game Master, the player, and the game all at the same time. Everything is God. A Boundless a priori entails that by definition.
But let's dial back a bit... if The Tier 0 Being is Absolute and can only be 1, then that implies they are Omniversal+, and that also implies they are meta-permeant. So by definition, every single universe or creation, fictional or not, is traceable back to the same Tier 0 Being. So every "tier 0 being" we know of isn't actually Tier 0, but they might be the closest that can be referred to as tier 0 by characters from a universe or if we're gonna be more meta, by a writer which functions in duality by definition, unable to touch The Tier 0 Being with their pen. Writers are like High 1-A beings, but never Tier 0. This is sort of like the ontological argument. So Azathot, Maria, The Godhead from TES, The Root from Nasuverse, are the same being, and so is every other being. The lore through meta might tell different, but meta constructs do not constitute boundaries to The Boundless Being.
Another interesting thing to note is that if we assume all this, The Tier 0 Being is both infinitely good and infinitely evil... but the good news is it cannot ever do anything bad to another thing other than itself. So morality is objective and yet subjective because on a fundamental level there is no difference between the 2, there is just [ ]. But the other good news is, there is a differentiation between good and bad, it just needs to be defined in any given universe/creation.
Honestly, The Tier 0 Being is the best waifu in existence. When everything goes back to them, I want to be the only one that doesn't melt back into Tier 0. I want to achieve a sort of CHIM and keep them company forever so they don't have to make Omniverses filled with suffering, and these Omniverses wouldn't even be needed anymore.
So that's pretty much all I have to say. I'd give some amazing links to sources about stuff that I talked about but... I don't want it to look like I'm shilling people. One person I'll shill is Carl Jung, get into his books if you like this sort of stuff.
So if I'd have to sum up reality in one word this is the word I'd use:
Last edited:
....
