- 12,447
- 5,641
bump???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Already working on a refute.Kirbonic is working on his response atm
Plus we're waiting for DDM's own counter to the downgrade.Kirbonic is working on his response atm
The "offhand comment" about "bringing peace to the universe" as the game's ultimate goal is led up to by multiple statements about exactly what you are directly bringing peace to and into as a direct consequence of defeating Wart and his minions within this single Subcon. Which is bringing peace to a Subcon and its residents, not the main universe Mario sleeps in and its dreamers, every time its brought up.Out of everything listed here, the only thing that supports universal size is the one offhanded comment about “bringing peace to the universe”, but every other screenshot for this guide explicitly refers to Subcons as “dream worlds”. Considering that affecting Subcons has an affect on the real world and Wart, as shown by BS SMBUSA can reach and mess with multiple Subcons, that affecting the dreams of people throughout the world / universe would disrupt the peace of the universe, not the dream world, but the main universe where people have their dreams? And defeating Wart would restore said peace? The only piece of evidence supporting Subcon / dream worlds being a universe being an offhand line from a tip book from the 80s is a little wild, especially if it’s what carries an entire multiversal cosmology.
(Post is from Kirb, he's just busy at work rn)
I can relate.Yeah I’m about to be almost completely offline for a whole week. I had free time pre Christmas but January has been a hell month.
2-1 in favor so far to downgrade? Given Maverick Zero X and Deagonx agree with the OP, DarkDragonMedeus disagrees.Might as well follow, this is interesting. Whats the winning argument so far (to downgrade, or not to downgrade?)
Whats the original japanese kanji?
Jeez, I'm sorry to hear that, dude; hope you get better.Just had some of the worst past couple weeks and am recovering from Covid and college just started, so this wasn’t really super high priority, amongst that, but I will try to cook up the aforementioned reply with Fuji asap
I dunno, but I'm working on cosmology blogs for both the entire Super Mario verse and the structure of the dreams. I actually found more universes than I thought.Whats the original japanese kanji?
Good lord, that sucks mate- i hope things get better!Just had some of the worst past couple weeks and am recovering from Covid and college just started, so this wasn’t really super high priority, amongst that, but I will try to cook up the aforementioned reply with Fuji asap
Oh wait yeah you’re right.They’re not, but it’s already established there’s an infinite amount of dreamers, and dreams being separate space-times is still okay, so The Void and Chaos Heart shouldn’t be downgraded. They’d still be destroying an infinite amount of 4D spaces.
Gonna reiterate this with what StretchSebe said here:They’re not, but it’s already established there’s an infinite amount of dreamers, and dreams being separate space-times is still okay, so The Void and Chaos Heart shouldn’t be downgraded. They’d still be destroying an infinite amount of 4D spaces.
Late to the party:
The 'starry skies only proves 4-A at most' and similar arguments/points are an inherently fallacious argument. Saying we can 'only observe' a certain amount of a given spacetime (yes, spacetime. More on that later), and therefore we can only assume as much as we can observe is literally an argument from ignorance. And given this could apply to literally any series that hasn't shown literally the entirety of its universe and/or time, I think we should put this specific argument to bed forever.
Here's a couple facts about our own universe:
On that, and because of these facts, for 'universe' levels, this wiki recognizes:
- It is constantly expanding. It has been doing so since it's inception.
- The amount of ours we've observed is only about 46.5 billion lightyears in any direction, and is roughly 93 billion light years total. Though estimates and theories on the actual size range from us only observing 5% of the entire universe to even space being infinite (largely due to constant expansion; entropy is beyond the scope of this discussion) professionals, and more digestibly, Wikipedia acknowledges our current agnosticism as a species: 'the spatial size, if any, of the entire universe is unknown.' We've barely observed our own universe, and nobody worth their salt is going to pretend they know size otherwise.
This has already been discussed and established in numerous threads, but even by the admission of this initial post:
- 3-A (Universe level) as: "Characters who can destroy all celestial bodies within a volume at least equivalent to the observable universe via an omnidirectional explosion, alternately create or significantly affect[1] a universe of comparable size, which does not involve the destruction and/or creation of space-time." (more on this soon)
- High 3-A (High Universe level) as: "Characters or objects that demonstrate an infinite amount of energy on a 3-D scale, such as creating or destroying infinite mass, or those who can affect an infinite 3-D space. This extends to an infinite number of finite or infinite-sized 3-D universes or pocket dimensions when not accounting for when not accounting for any higher dimensions or time. Large numbers of infinite 3-D universes, unless causally closed from one another by a separate spacetime or existence, only count for a higher level of this tier. Being “infinitely” stronger than this level, unless uncountably so, does not qualify for any higher tier."
- And Low 2-C (Universe+) as: "Characters or objects that are capable of significantly affecting,[1] creating, and/or destroying an area of space qualitatively larger than an infinitely-sized 3-dimensional space. Common fictional examples of spaces representing such sizes are space-time continuums (the entire past, present and future of 3-dimensional space) of a universal scale. However, it can be more generally fulfilled by any 4-dimensional space that is either:
A) Equivalent to a large extra dimensional space. That is, a higher-dimensional "bulk" space which embeds lower-dimensional ones (Such as our universe) as subsets of itself, whose dimensions are not microscopic / compactified.
B) Portrayed as completely transcending lower-dimensional objects and spaces in the setting of a given work of fiction.
Dreams contain space and time in this verse.
This immediately means any given dream is an entire spacetime, making it more than just any 'observable universe' and at the very least High Universe sized by the rules of the wiki. But we're talking about more than one dream. Lots of dreams, even. The cosmology isn't one 'big dream' or something. No amount of 'well we only see x amount' changes this fact.
Tl;dr: Thread starter is unsound: Founded upon an inherently fallacious argument from ignorance. Literally using the wiki's primary example of this fallacy as its structure: "There is no evidence of A, so A cannot possibly be true." But there is evidence, provided within this thread starter of all places, and that can be found otherwise discussed on this wiki. We're literally running so far back in terms of what's seemingly acceptable evidence from the series and concepts within it that we're stagnating at pre-Super Mario Bros 2 and it's dreamworld with its own distinct spacetime in it in terms of the information this post is suggesting we can know, accept, or use for a series that's been around for 40+ years.
We have discussed these exact points to death. There's nothing proving that dreams aren't universes, necessarily, but there's nothing proving they are, either. Having space and time isn't enough; a dimension needs to have the proper size, and dreams in Mario lack sufficient evidence to say they do.
Regardless, I should be able to get back to working on a response soon.
This thread has gotten really out of hand, to be honest.We have discussed these exact points to death. There's nothing proving that dreams aren't universes, necessarily, but there's nothing proving they are, either. Having space and time isn't enough; a dimension needs to have the proper size, and dreams in Mario lack sufficient evidence to say they do.
Regardless, I should be able to get back to working on a response soon.
Yeah, we were derailed pretty early on, so I wouldn't be opposed to remaking the thread. However, given @Kirbonic_Pikmin did the majority of the work here, I'd rather ask him.This thread has gotten really out of hand, to be honest.
Given the immense amount of bloat, I would not be opposed to you remaking this as a staff thread, and giving the main opponents/advocates an opportunity to make a single summary of their points, and voting then.
What are your thoughts on this?
I have been experiencing the same kinds of glitches. Maybe it's something that needs to be fixed.Idk why that message sent half incomplete lol
I would be fine with making a staff only thread yes. Fuji and I will workshop the OP and also make replies to any major counter arguments and will probably go ahead and do that asap.Yeah, we were derailed pretty early on, so I wouldn't be opposed to remaking the thread. However, given @Kirbonic_Pikmin did the majority of the work here, I'd rather ask him.
What are your thoughts on this?
Okay. I'll close this and wait for the follow up thread. When that is opened, please comment on my wall so that I am made aware of it.I would be fine with making a staff only thread yes. Fuji and I will workshop the OP and also make replies to any major counter arguments and will probably go ahead and do that asap.