Again irrelevant point is Beerus actions had nothing to do with time travel. If so no splits in time would happen.
The very fact they happen in the past, as a consequence of a mf time traveling.
Then why you arguing for him?
Im not? Wtf?
Beerus erased Zamasu new timeline it’s pretty simple.
Exactly. Youre ignoring all the context around it though.
Dude, you realize that's the point of contention right?
He’s in a whole other reality Beerus is dead in the past of trunks timeline a matter a fact.
Yes, except, Trunks' timeline is a whole like 17y ahead. Beerus' timeline, is in the past still. Of which the very fact he killed them was due to a future mf warning him.
Why didnt a timeline form for Beerus not killing him? A timeline for Beerus going to kill him, then opting not to? A timeline where Beerus went to kill him, but waited like 5 seconds longer to finish his food first?
Shit evidently aint as common as it's being argued as.
That’s going to a completely different reality all together it’s not a contradiction you’re trying to make this more complicated than it actually is
My dude.
The different reality exists due to time travel to begin with.
Main timeline future trunks timeline and the Zamasu timeline. Fro their perspective that’s the only timerings that should exist.
And yet youre arguing there's a room with a fucktillion in them that Zamasu 100% would know exists.
Ignoring all that, Zamasu checks timelines BESIDES those anyway when checking, so he evidently wasnt limiting himself to those 3.
They were shocked that a green one was formed not at the existence of the time rings itself.
Yeah, shocked a brand new one formed.
It’s based of the contradiction in the argument being presented period what the crt is proposing is narratively impossible.
Dude, youre quoting actual unreliable yappers, ignoring hard statements, and visual proof, and arguing that's the narrative. Nuh uh.
Ignoring the fact that many gods state Time branches off from the smallest things like a flower being plucked.
Scan? Is that recent? From a reliable source? Does that one line override the like 13 contradictions? Etc.
The implication is clear they have time rings in a room full of identical boxes the context clues are clear.!
And yet bro says that's all of them, like 3 times, including times they wouldnt be arbitrarily limiting themselves to a select few because why the hell would they? They dont even know what theyre looking for?
I asked you, very explicitly, to show me a statement saying theyre limiting it to such a select few. If you can not do that, then there's nothing to argue here.
And "implication", isnt good enough. Youre arguing a countless cosmology and handwaving hard statements corroborated by direct visual proof based on "idk i FEEL like that room has more"? That isnt how it works. Not withstanding youre basically arguing if bro whipped out anything, that whole room by proxy would be full of them.
Like take a office. Just because one drawer contains a super important document dont mean they all do. Why the hell assume the whole room filled with them. If i grabbed a 6 pack out of a cupboard and said "damn that's all of it", you wouldnt assume every other cupboard has some too, like come on man