- 21,469
- 30,790
Sorry in advance. I wanted this to be a Q&A but
So I was digging through a bunch of sources trying to do research on the destruction of Planet Vegeta since the feat just got revised, and I was checking its validity until I came across something weird.
So in the calc we have, it calculates the destruction of Planet Vegeta from an explosion that forms from the inside. But then I looked deep into the feat in itself... and there was a problem.
Planet Vegeta wasn't blown up by Frieza's attack. It was destroyed by a chain reaction, ignited by Frieza's attack.
In the feat we have, it's calced from this scene, where Frieza's supernova smacked into the surface of Planet Vegeta. We see there are some cracks, and then after a certain amount of time, the planet blows up.
From 1:26 to 1:31, we see a bunch of minor explosions happening that don't even scar the surface of the planet. Those explosions eventually increase in intensity and size. We also see cracks forming throughout the planet. At the beginning of 1:31, we see the peak of the chain reaction, the whole planet riddled with large cracks, and now much bigger explosions to where the light from them comprise large parts of the screen. At the end of 1:31 to 1:32, we see that the explosion starts from the center of the planet, making no sense if the Supernova blew up from 1 side and its explosion blew up the planet.
This is a textbook chain reaction. The ball dug through the surface of the planet until it reached the center, then it blew up the core, which blew up the planet even further.
This isn't a canon only thing. Toei shares this view, as the planet blew up from a chain reaction when the technique dug super deep into the planet then blew up.
Arguments against the core producing damage above the GBE isn't really valid, as Frieza destroyed Namek's core and it took 5 minutes with a suppressed attack for it to blow up. You wanna tell me this is below the GBE of the planet?
Basically, the explosion of the planet doesn't appear to be solely from the explosion of Frieza's attack. Whatever it was, whether it was a core explosion or a chain reaction, it wasn't like Buu's that just blew up and engulfed the planet. This specifically looked like a chain reaction.
If this is valid, then either the direct damage calced from Frieza destroying the planet or Vegeta's galick gun will be the primary point of scaling.
So I was digging through a bunch of sources trying to do research on the destruction of Planet Vegeta since the feat just got revised, and I was checking its validity until I came across something weird.
So in the calc we have, it calculates the destruction of Planet Vegeta from an explosion that forms from the inside. But then I looked deep into the feat in itself... and there was a problem.
Planet Vegeta wasn't blown up by Frieza's attack. It was destroyed by a chain reaction, ignited by Frieza's attack.
In the feat we have, it's calced from this scene, where Frieza's supernova smacked into the surface of Planet Vegeta. We see there are some cracks, and then after a certain amount of time, the planet blows up.
From 1:26 to 1:31, we see a bunch of minor explosions happening that don't even scar the surface of the planet. Those explosions eventually increase in intensity and size. We also see cracks forming throughout the planet. At the beginning of 1:31, we see the peak of the chain reaction, the whole planet riddled with large cracks, and now much bigger explosions to where the light from them comprise large parts of the screen. At the end of 1:31 to 1:32, we see that the explosion starts from the center of the planet, making no sense if the Supernova blew up from 1 side and its explosion blew up the planet.
This is a textbook chain reaction. The ball dug through the surface of the planet until it reached the center, then it blew up the core, which blew up the planet even further.
This isn't a canon only thing. Toei shares this view, as the planet blew up from a chain reaction when the technique dug super deep into the planet then blew up.
Arguments against the core producing damage above the GBE isn't really valid, as Frieza destroyed Namek's core and it took 5 minutes with a suppressed attack for it to blow up. You wanna tell me this is below the GBE of the planet?
Basically, the explosion of the planet doesn't appear to be solely from the explosion of Frieza's attack. Whatever it was, whether it was a core explosion or a chain reaction, it wasn't like Buu's that just blew up and engulfed the planet. This specifically looked like a chain reaction.
If this is valid, then either the direct damage calced from Frieza destroying the planet or Vegeta's galick gun will be the primary point of scaling.