- 1,633
- 178
@Kaltias
On what multiplier? You mean calcing powerlevels? I thought you meant in universe multipliers
On what multiplier? You mean calcing powerlevels? I thought you meant in universe multipliers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you mean by a statement alone? Kaioken not only has been consistently said to multiply it's user's power, it has also consistently being displayed as giving the user the amount of power that would require. It's supported by multiple statements and showings without contradiction.Kaltias said:>Stacking multipliers isn't present.
The proposal in the OP is a x1600 increase based on multiplier stacking
And again, bigger multiplier requires a greater evidence. A statement alone won't cut it
What exactly are you asking for? Do you want data of exactly how much Goku got stronger by each Kaioken multiplier? This shows that in order to get a high multiplier accepted, all you need is statements from a reliable person(King Kai who invented the technique) and consistency(aka Kaioken's multipliers doing exactly what they're told to do in story and letting him do things that would require that level of boost).Kaltias said:Again:
" For higher multipliers, like times 100 and above, the importance of stronger evidence, such as feats displaying power of a similar magnitude as the value the multiplier points to or the multipliers importance to the plot of the story, and a higher amount of evidence becomes increasingly necessary."
After the stacking, it's a x1600 increase.
It would require more evidence than "this guy is stronger after using it"
Like how Goku could hold his own and match Frieza in combat?Kaltias said:Again:
" For higher multipliers, like times 100 and above, the importance of stronger evidence, such as feats displaying power of a similar magnitude as the value the multiplier points to or the multipliers importance to the plot of the story, and a higher amount of evidence becomes increasingly necessary."
You're speaking about a guy that is casually quadrillions of times FTL, how exactly that disprove Early DBZ Piccolo of having Relativistic speed?Kaltias said:Also, the fact that the weakest guy with a speed feat above the one obtained via multipliers is Beerus should say something about consistency
Aside for Piccolo's Moon busting feat (and Master Roshi's Moon busting feat) then none, but that doesn't mean now the former must be without doubt an outlier.Kaltias said:Name one feat in DBZ of someone going multiple times faster than light.
And that's a problem because? Did Toriyama himself come you to conferm that MFTL speed its impossible for DBZ characters? Its was stated in the series that no one can react/move that fast?Kaltias said:Because accepting Kaioken means MFTL Frieza
You know that making the speed of the Ki Blast invalid you are making invalid the entire feat as well, since the result is also depend by that factor.Damage3245 said:While Piccolo blowing up the moon is not an outlier in terms of AP, no other ki blast seems to replicate that level of speed for most of the series. In fact there are significant anti-feats for travel speed throughout the rest of the series.
I don't get this bit here. Beerus has his own feat for his speed. The people weaker than him have their own feats and multipliers that effect the people faster than them. I don't see why Beerus having a feat and not multipliers has anything to do with consistency.Kaltias said:Also, the fact that the weakest guy with a speed feat above the one obtained via multipliers is Beerus should say something about consistency