Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,248
- 14,614
Probably you misunderstands my point, i said about space-time in general not just DB. But anyway, a small space-time being a subset of another space-time. By your default assumption, we should nuke tier 1 onward. Thus, there is no reason to default assume that a space-time need to be separate by default. And when you said about evidence, i believe Ottavio already posted it being a subspace of U7 and belong to an area inside the Macrocosm. Thus the burden of proof is on you. Lastly, no, separate dimension doesn't automatically mean separate space-time, because you can well have two dimension separated by space but being constrain under the same time axis, time flow at different rate don't mean different space-timeyes there is, it is said the be a separated dimension, it is not considered to be part of the universe, it has its own space time, and we have no proof nor reason to believe that it is part of the timeline, for anyone to say that it is part of the timeline it would need evidence
Also for the sake of arguing, based on your logic, that space-time should be separate by default, then ROSAT should be entire outside of the timeline which contain 12 universes, the neutral space between universe, zeno realm, etc......which make no sense annd contradicted by many
Proof??refer to everytime anyone used the term universe in dbs, but also the main point was, with it not being considered to be inside the universe we now have no reason to believe that it is, same goes for the timeline
Still 2-C and up, unless there is contradiction, such as the branch timeline is disjoined timeline, or the branch is not separated for infinite amount of time, or you don't actually destroy the entire branchIf Pains revision goes through, branching timelines won’t be higher than low 2-C right?