- 12,191
- 6,132
In the Dragon Ball Super Heroes novel it is mentioned that Cell's attack will take the entire UniverseAt what point is it stated that Cell can destroy all the celestial bodies in the universe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the Dragon Ball Super Heroes novel it is mentioned that Cell's attack will take the entire UniverseAt what point is it stated that Cell can destroy all the celestial bodies in the universe?
For it to be a higher time dimension, time must flow in a different direction, therefore it will be orthogonal, and in the case of HTC although it has a different time dimension, btw it continues to flow in the same direction as the universal time of U7, so isn’t orthogonal but parallel, and as far as I know, parallel time dimensions don’t give low 1-C…Ugh what?
HTC has its own separate time dimension and it's contained within U7 which has its own time axis as well
Should HTC become significantly sized (aka universal) it's time axis would be tierable and U7 would have 2 time dimensions
Not necessarily if the time dimension can overarch or hold lesser time dimensions it is assumed to be orthogonal directlyFor it to be a higher time dimension, time must flow in a different direction, therefore it will be orthogonal, and in the case of HTC although it has a different time dimension, btw it continues to flow in the same direction as the universal time of U7, so isn’t orthogonal but parallel, and as far as I know, parallel time dimensions don’t give low 1-C…
As long as a realm that has its time dimension contains/encompasses another one that has a unique time dimension, it's a higher time dimension, and is assumed orthogonalFor it to be a higher time dimension, time must flow in a different direction, therefore it will be orthogonal, and in the case of HTC although it has a different time dimension, btw it continues to flow in the same direction as the universal time of U7, so isn’t orthogonal but parallel, and as far as I know, parallel time dimensions don’t give low 1-C…
That's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.i doubted anything in DB was low 1-C yet here we are
I will be supporting youThat's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.
Thanks for your great work we’ve low 1-C DBSThat's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.
Time Axis do not have spatial sizes for that to matter, it's second temporal dimension is already tierable, hence the current low 1-C ratingUgh what?
HTC has its own separate time dimension and it's contained within U7 which has its own time axis as well
Should HTC become significantly sized (aka universal) it's time axis would be tierable and U7 would have 2 time dimensions
It does here, it has to service at least a universe sized space. That's why HTC doesn't count towards any low1C argument for universe 7Time Axis do not have spatial sizes for that to matter,
DB has 3 Temporal dimensions but only 2 are tierable, the one for the macrocosms and the one for the timeline that contains them.it's second temporal dimension is already tierable, hence the current low 1-C rating
but the universe is already significant in its 3D space, it shouldn't need to be proven to be significant in 3D space x2It does here, it has to service at least a universe sized space. That's why HTC doesn't count towards any low1C argument for universe 7
.....the ROSAT's temporal dimension statement is cureently used as proof of the second temporal dimension thoIt does here, it has to service at least a universe sized space. That's why HTC doesn't count towards any low1C argument for universe 7
......DB has 2 temporal Dimensions, 1 for the individual universes, the other for the entire hyper timeline emcompassing said universes, the ROSAT's statement was used for proof of thatDB has 3 Temporal dimensions but only 2 are tierable, the one for the macrocosms and the one for the timeline that contains them.
if the HTC is within U7s timeline, then the overarching timeline Zeno destroyed would be 6D and each universe would be 5D.......DB has 2 temporal Dimensions, 1 for the individual universes, the other for the entire hyper timeline emcompassing said universes, the ROSAT's statement was used for proof of that
@Hasty12345 this is your chance! Show the fruits of your improved education!!!That's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.
Wasn’t destroying planet Vegeta a 5-A/High 5-A feat?If yall don't know
DBS: Destruction of Planet Vegeta, Frieza Upgrade
So this is the currently used calc for Frieza destroying planet Vegeta, it assumes that Vegeta is the size of earth, however this blog has now put forth a baseline for an average Planet in dragon ball using canon information The calculation for planet Vegeta is identical with one except, the...vsbattles.com
Unfortunately, for some reason, spatial size matters with unique time dimensionsbut the universe is already significant in its 3D space, it shouldn't need to be proven to be significant in 3D space x2
if the HTC is a temporal dimension orthogonal by U7s timeline, it is low 1-C period.
It was used as supporting proof to show that U7 has its own time dimension as it was called a "different time dimension" to the living world.....the ROSAT's temporal dimension statement is cureently used as proof of the second temporal dimension tho
Go and recheck the hyper timeline blog......DB has 2 temporal Dimensions, 1 for the individual universes, the other for the entire hyper timeline emcompassing said universes, the ROSAT's statement was used for proof of that
This wiki doesn't accept this reasoning at this point, a time dimension must apparently service a minimum of a universe sized space to be tieredif the HTC is within U7s timeline, then the overarching timeline Zeno destroyed would be 6D and each universe would be 5D.
currently it's just Dwarf Star, but if this thread gets accepted it'll be Small StarWasn’t destroying planet Vegeta a 5-A/High 5-A feat?
Just read the first line of that threadWasn’t destroying planet Vegeta a 5-A/High 5-A feat?
Unfortunately, for some reason, spatial size matters with unique time dimensions
Have you got a quote for this?This wiki doesn't accept this reasoning at this point, a time dimension must apparently service a minimum of a universe sized space to be tiered
No quote, I checked, but it's basically an unspoken rule here, I've asked in the QnA and got the same response, either they not sure or they believe it's universe sizedHave you got a quote for this?
Temporal dimensions aren't the same as timelines, temporal axes are assumed to be infinite iirc, proving a 5th-dimensional time axis services a 3D space is proven by being the 5th axis of a universe axiomatically.
can anyone actually explain to me what it means for a temporal axis to be "universal in size"?No quote, I checked, but it's basically an unspoken rule here, I've asked in the QnA and got the same response, either they not sure or they believe it's universe sized
beats me tbh this is why I hate the current standards. But from what I’ve read it seems that only a temporal axis that serves at least a universal sized realm can be considered tierable or significant 5Dcan anyone actually explain to me what it means for a temporal axis to be "universal in size"?
why does a 5D temporal axis need to have a corresponding universal sized 3D space other than the universe itself?beats me tbh this is why I hate the current standards. But from what I’ve read it seems that only a temporal axis that serves at least a universal sized realm can be considered tierable or significant 5D
but yeah honestly low 1-C universes is not at all a crazy idea atp. In an era where universal and even Multiversal bleach is anything more than a joke I think we can seriously entertain the idea of low 1-C U7 tooThat's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.
Cuz standardswhy does a 5D temporal axis need to have a corresponding universal sized 3D space other than the universe itself?
There's only one way it can.That's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.
but it doesn't even make senseCuz standards
There's only one way it can.
small star level frieza is great, wonder how this will change the scaling chainsIt looks like planet vegeta calc would be accepted.
bro nothing past tier low 2-C makes sense lets be realbut it doesn't even make sense
Truebro nothing past tier low 2-C makes sense lets be real
thoughts on this feat btw?but it doesn't even make sense
I'm not falling for that.thoughts on this feat btw?
I'm not falling for that.