• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

Ugh what?

HTC has its own separate time dimension and it's contained within U7 which has its own time axis as well

Should HTC become significantly sized (aka universal) it's time axis would be tierable and U7 would have 2 time dimensions
For it to be a higher time dimension, time must flow in a different direction, therefore it will be orthogonal, and in the case of HTC although it has a different time dimension, btw it continues to flow in the same direction as the universal time of U7, so isn’t orthogonal but parallel, and as far as I know, parallel time dimensions don’t give low 1-C…
 
For it to be a higher time dimension, time must flow in a different direction, therefore it will be orthogonal, and in the case of HTC although it has a different time dimension, btw it continues to flow in the same direction as the universal time of U7, so isn’t orthogonal but parallel, and as far as I know, parallel time dimensions don’t give low 1-C…
Not necessarily if the time dimension can overarch or hold lesser time dimensions it is assumed to be orthogonal directly
 
For it to be a higher time dimension, time must flow in a different direction, therefore it will be orthogonal, and in the case of HTC although it has a different time dimension, btw it continues to flow in the same direction as the universal time of U7, so isn’t orthogonal but parallel, and as far as I know, parallel time dimensions don’t give low 1-C…
As long as a realm that has its time dimension contains/encompasses another one that has a unique time dimension, it's a higher time dimension, and is assumed orthogonal


All this was settled last year
 
Ugh what?

HTC has its own separate time dimension and it's contained within U7 which has its own time axis as well

Should HTC become significantly sized (aka universal) it's time axis would be tierable and U7 would have 2 time dimensions
Time Axis do not have spatial sizes for that to matter, it's second temporal dimension is already tierable, hence the current low 1-C rating
 
Time Axis do not have spatial sizes for that to matter,
It does here, it has to service at least a universe sized space. That's why HTC doesn't count towards any low1C argument for universe 7
it's second temporal dimension is already tierable, hence the current low 1-C rating
DB has 3 Temporal dimensions but only 2 are tierable, the one for the macrocosms and the one for the timeline that contains them.
 
It does here, it has to service at least a universe sized space. That's why HTC doesn't count towards any low1C argument for universe 7
.....the ROSAT's temporal dimension statement is cureently used as proof of the second temporal dimension tho

DB has 3 Temporal dimensions but only 2 are tierable, the one for the macrocosms and the one for the timeline that contains them.
......DB has 2 temporal Dimensions, 1 for the individual universes, the other for the entire hyper timeline emcompassing said universes, the ROSAT's statement was used for proof of that
 
If I remember correctly there was no statement used for hypertinelines.
 
If yall don't know
 
If yall don't know
Wasn’t destroying planet Vegeta a 5-A/High 5-A feat?
 
but the universe is already significant in its 3D space, it shouldn't need to be proven to be significant in 3D space x2

if the HTC is a temporal dimension orthogonal by U7s timeline, it is low 1-C period.
Unfortunately, for some reason, spatial size matters with unique time dimensions

.....the ROSAT's temporal dimension statement is cureently used as proof of the second temporal dimension tho
It was used as supporting proof to show that U7 has its own time dimension as it was called a "different time dimension" to the living world
......DB has 2 temporal Dimensions, 1 for the individual universes, the other for the entire hyper timeline emcompassing said universes, the ROSAT's statement was used for proof of that
Go and recheck the hyper timeline blog
if the HTC is within U7s timeline, then the overarching timeline Zeno destroyed would be 6D and each universe would be 5D.
This wiki doesn't accept this reasoning at this point, a time dimension must apparently service a minimum of a universe sized space to be tiered
 
Unfortunately, for some reason, spatial size matters with unique time dimensions
This wiki doesn't accept this reasoning at this point, a time dimension must apparently service a minimum of a universe sized space to be tiered
Have you got a quote for this?

Temporal dimensions aren't the same as timelines, temporal axes are assumed to be infinite iirc, proving a 5th-dimensional time axis services a 3D space is proven by being the 5th axis of a universe axiomatically.
 
Have you got a quote for this?

Temporal dimensions aren't the same as timelines, temporal axes are assumed to be infinite iirc, proving a 5th-dimensional time axis services a 3D space is proven by being the 5th axis of a universe axiomatically.
No quote, I checked, but it's basically an unspoken rule here, I've asked in the QnA and got the same response, either they not sure or they believe it's universe sized
 
No quote, I checked, but it's basically an unspoken rule here, I've asked in the QnA and got the same response, either they not sure or they believe it's universe sized
can anyone actually explain to me what it means for a temporal axis to be "universal in size"?
 
can anyone actually explain to me what it means for a temporal axis to be "universal in size"?
beats me tbh this is why I hate the current standards. But from what I’ve read it seems that only a temporal axis that serves at least a universal sized realm can be considered tierable or significant 5D
 
beats me tbh this is why I hate the current standards. But from what I’ve read it seems that only a temporal axis that serves at least a universal sized realm can be considered tierable or significant 5D
why does a 5D temporal axis need to have a corresponding universal sized 3D space other than the universe itself?
 
That's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.
but yeah honestly low 1-C universes is not at all a crazy idea atp. In an era where universal and even Multiversal bleach is anything more than a joke I think we can seriously entertain the idea of low 1-C U7 too

Jokes aside as I said U7 is probably already an insignificant 5D structure by current standards all we really need is one or two good statements and it can happen which is really just a covert scheme so I can have 1-C DBH which is where it should be
 
8n8bpo.jpg
 
Back
Top