- 12,258
- 6,208
In the Dragon Ball Super Heroes novel it is mentioned that Cell's attack will take the entire Universe
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
- 198
- 396
For it to be a higher time dimension, time must flow in a different direction, therefore it will be orthogonal, and in the case of HTC although it has a different time dimension, btw it continues to flow in the same direction as the universal time of U7, so isn’t orthogonal but parallel, and as far as I know, parallel time dimensions don’t give low 1-C…
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,089
- 1,836
Not necessarily if the time dimension can overarch or hold lesser time dimensions it is assumed to be orthogonal directly
- 1,682
- 1,315
As long as a realm that has its time dimension contains/encompasses another one that has a unique time dimension, it's a higher time dimension, and is assumed orthogonal
All this was settled last year
- 1,426
- 3,583
That's unironically my long-term goal here insofar as Dragon Ball is concerned. Whether it's through 5-D Afterlife, overarching Marcocosm timeline, Subspace, or Swirling Lights Dimensions, fingers crossed Universe 7 reaches Low 1-C sooner or later.
- 12,258
- 6,208
I will be supporting you
- 198
- 396
So if I understand correctly, your point is that if HTC, which has its own time dimension and in this wiki is portrayed as a subspace of universe 7, proves to have a significant size, then the U7, which contains it, would have a higher time dimension?
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
The fact U7 has the HTC inside of it's timeline would already mean that U7 is insignificant 5D and tbh, and I'm not even seeing how it wouldn't be straight up 5D, temporal axes aren't assumed finite iirc
- 198
- 396
Thanks for your great work we’ve low 1-C DBS
- 12,482
- 4,486
Time Axis do not have spatial sizes for that to matter, it's second temporal dimension is already tierable, hence the current low 1-C rating
- 1,682
- 1,315
It does here, it has to service at least a universe sized space. That's why HTC doesn't count towards any low1C argument for universe 7
DB has 3 Temporal dimensions but only 2 are tierable, the one for the macrocosms and the one for the timeline that contains them.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
but the universe is already significant in its 3D space, it shouldn't need to be proven to be significant in 3D space x2
if the HTC is a temporal dimension orthogonal by U7s timeline, it is low 1-C period.
- 12,482
- 4,486
.....the ROSAT's temporal dimension statement is cureently used as proof of the second temporal dimension tho
......DB has 2 temporal Dimensions, 1 for the individual universes, the other for the entire hyper timeline emcompassing said universes, the ROSAT's statement was used for proof of that
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
if the HTC is within U7s timeline, then the overarching timeline Zeno destroyed would be 6D and each universe would be 5D.
Deleted member 40688
Guest
If I remember correctly there was no statement used for hypertinelines.
- 1,967
- 1,664
@Hasty12345 this is your chance! Show the fruits of your improved education!!!
Deleted member 40688
Guest
If yall don't know
vsbattles.com
DBS: Destruction of Planet Vegeta, Frieza Upgrade
So this is the currently used calc for Frieza destroying planet Vegeta, it assumes that Vegeta is the size of earth, however this blog has now put forth a baseline for an average Planet in dragon ball using canon information The calculation for planet Vegeta is identical with one except, the...
- 198
- 396
Wasn’t destroying planet Vegeta a 5-A/High 5-A feat?If yall don't know
DBS: Destruction of Planet Vegeta, Frieza Upgrade
So this is the currently used calc for Frieza destroying planet Vegeta, it assumes that Vegeta is the size of earth, however this blog has now put forth a baseline for an average Planet in dragon ball using canon information The calculation for planet Vegeta is identical with one except, the...
- 1,682
- 1,315
Unfortunately, for some reason, spatial size matters with unique time dimensions
It was used as supporting proof to show that U7 has its own time dimension as it was called a "different time dimension" to the living world
Go and recheck the hyper timeline blog
This wiki doesn't accept this reasoning at this point, a time dimension must apparently service a minimum of a universe sized space to be tiered
- 3,454
- 2,224
currently it's just Dwarf Star, but if this thread gets accepted it'll be Small Star
Deleted member 40688
Guest
Just read the first line of that thread
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
Have you got a quote for this?
Temporal dimensions aren't the same as timelines, temporal axes are assumed to be infinite iirc, proving a 5th-dimensional time axis services a 3D space is proven by being the 5th axis of a universe axiomatically.
- 1,682
- 1,315
No quote, I checked, but it's basically an unspoken rule here, I've asked in the QnA and got the same response, either they not sure or they believe it's universe sized
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
can anyone actually explain to me what it means for a temporal axis to be "universal in size"?
- 1,967
- 1,664
beats me tbh this is why I hate the current standards. But from what I’ve read it seems that only a temporal axis that serves at least a universal sized realm can be considered tierable or significant 5D
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
why does a 5D temporal axis need to have a corresponding universal sized 3D space other than the universe itself?
- 1,967
- 1,664
but yeah honestly low 1-C universes is not at all a crazy idea atp. In an era where universal and even Multiversal bleach is anything more than a joke I think we can seriously entertain the idea of low 1-C U7 too
Jokes aside as I said U7 is probably already an insignificant 5D structure by current standards all we really need is one or two good statements and it can happen
- 1,967
- 1,664
Cuz standards
- 2,721
- 3,520
There's only one way it can.
- 6,943
- 7,321
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
but it doesn't even make sense
Deleted member 40688
Guest
Deleted member 40688
Guest
It looks like planet vegeta calc would be accepted.
- 2,721
- 3,520
small star level frieza is great, wonder how this will change the scaling chains
- 1,967
- 1,664
bro nothing past tier low 2-C makes sense lets be real
Deleted member 40688
Guest
True
I have no idea what yall talk about half of the time
- 1,967
- 1,664
thoughts on this feat btw?
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,365
- 4,206
I'm not falling for that.
- 1,967
- 1,664
Similar threads
